content-freshness
Skill2 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Keep content fresh in the way answer engines reward — a substantive update cadence, real refreshes (not cosmetic date changes), and a system for spotting decay. Works for any business, B2B or B2C, product or service. Use when the request is to update or refresh content for AI, set a content-freshness or update cadence, improve recency signals, decide what to re-publish, or fix stale pages that lost AI citations. Pairs with answer-engineering and evidence-and-citations.
In this repository26 other files it gives its agents.
- aeo-foundationSkill
- ai-capability-signalingSkill
- ai-crawler-accessSkill
- ai-referral-analyticsSkill
- ai-retrievabilitySkill
- ai-visibility-auditSkill
- ai-visibility-trackingSkill
- answer-engineeringSkill
- author-authoritySkill
- chatgpt-optimizationSkill
- claim-accuracySkill
- claude-optimizationSkill
- community-and-reviewsSkill
- comparison-contentSkill
- competitor-ai-analysisSkill
- crawler-log-analysisSkill
- digital-prSkill
- entity-optimizationSkill
- evidence-and-citationsSkill
- gemini-optimizationSkill
- google-ai-overviews-optimizationSkill
- llms-txtSkill
- multimodal-aeoSkill
- perplexity-optimizationSkill
- prompt-researchSkill
- structured-dataSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 32
Read aeo-foundation.md for the priority topics and prompt set — freshness effort should concentrate on the content tied to high-value …
- Distinctive: line 64
Refresh substantively: Update statistics and examples, add new sections or questions from the prompt set, correct anything outdated, and …
- Distinctive: line 70
Signal the update: Ensure the page is re-crawlable (sitemap, internal links) so engines pick up the new version.
- Distinctive: line 87
No schedule, so freshness happens only when someone remembers.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Content Freshness
This skill keeps content current enough to keep getting cited. Recency is a strong signal in AI answers — recently, substantively updated pages are cited markedly more, and some engines lean heavily on freshness because they retrieve in real time. But the signal rewards real updates: engines compare versions, so changing a date without changing the substance does nothing. This skill builds a cadence and a refresh method that earn the recency advantage honestly. It works for any business, B2B or B2C.
When to use this skill
- Setting an update cadence for a content library.
- Deciding which existing pages to refresh and how.
- Recovering pages that used to be cited and went quiet.
- Building freshness into an editorial process.
Before you start
Read aeo-foundation.md for the priority topics and prompt set — freshness effort should
concentrate on the content tied to high-value prompts. If it is missing, point to the
aeo-foundation skill.
Principles
- Substantive over cosmetic. A refresh must change real content — new data, new examples, revised guidance, added sections — not just the visible date. Engines detect the difference.
- Match cadence to volatility. Fast-moving topics (pricing, news, anything dated) need frequent updates; evergreen guides need less; reference/definition pages least.
- Prioritize by value. Refresh the pages that target high-value prompts and already have traction before touching the long tail.
- Recency is a tiebreaker, not a substitute. Freshness lifts content that is also well-structured, evidenced, and authoritative — it does not rescue thin pages.
Suggested cadence (adapt per topic)
| Content type | Typical refresh |
| Time-sensitive (pricing, stats, news, "in 2026") | Frequent — monthly to quarterly |
| Commercial / high-value guides | Quarterly to twice a year |
| Evergreen pillars | Twice a year |
| Reference / definitions | Annually, or when facts change |
Workflow
- Inventory and flag. List priority pages with their last substantive update and target prompts. Flag anything stale relative to its type, and anything that lost AI visibility.
- Diagnose decay. For pages that slipped, check what changed: outdated facts, a year in the title, superseded guidance, or a competitor publishing fresher work.
- Refresh substantively. Update statistics and examples, add new sections or questions from the prompt set, correct anything outdated, and re-verify citations. Pull in evidence-and-citations for new data and answer-engineering for any restructuring.
- Update the date honestly. Set
dateModified(and any visible "updated" line) to reflect the real change — see the schema cookbook. - Signal the update. Ensure the page is re-crawlable (sitemap, internal links) so engines pick up the new version.
- Schedule the next pass. Assign each page a cadence so freshness is systematic, not reactive.
Output format
- A refresh plan: which pages, what to change, target cadence, and owner.
- For each refreshed page, a note on the substantive changes made.
- Flags for pages that should be consolidated or retired rather than refreshed.
(assumption)tags where update history was unknown.
Common pitfalls
- Cosmetic date bumps with no real change — detected and ineffective.
- Refreshing low-value pages while flagship content goes stale.
- Treating freshness as a fix for thin or unstructured content.
- No schedule, so freshness happens only when someone remembers.
Related Skills
- answer-engineering — restructure sections during a refresh.
- evidence-and-citations — swap in current data and live sources.
- ai-visibility-tracking — surfaces pages losing citations, triggering refreshes.
- structured-data — keep
dateModifiedaccurate and honest.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

