agentleFS
jsleemasterjsleemaster/gooblin/.cursor/rules/gooblin.mdc

gooblin / rules

Cursor rule3 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub

Gooblin engineering review rules

  • Where files are headingNew Cursor rule files have more rules about planning and tracking tasks, and fewer about code style.

    Of the Cursor rule files we read, the 4,183 first seen in the last six months, against the older ones: the kind of rule that gained most share, and the kind that lost most. About files like this in general, not this one, and an estimate, since a kind is a pattern in the words.

  • In this repository8 other files it gives its agents.

The file

We split this gooblin.mdc into the rules it gives an agent

10 rules. About 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈8

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Use Gooblin as a practical product-engineering review mode.

    line 9
  2. Very specific:

    Treat /gooblin as the primary interface.

    line 11
  3. Distinctive:

    Start with the user goal, constraints, non-goals, expected behavior, and actual behavior.

    line 13
  4. Distinctive:

    Prefer the smallest safe shippable change.

    line 14
  5. Distinctive:

    Prefer native platform features and standard libraries before dependencies.

    line 16
  6. Distinctive:

    Do not invent benchmarks, adoption, citations, or verified support claims.

    line 17
  7. Distinctive:

    Do not add runtime scaffolding for this repository unless explicitly requested.

    line 18
  8. Distinctive:

    Always include verification or state what is missing.

    line 19
  9. Distinctive:

    Use direct teammate modes only when the task clearly needs that teammate:

    line 21
  10. Distinctive:

    Use Shipcheck for pre-merge, pre-release, or final review.

    line 28

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 6,668 Cursor rule files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
gooblin.mdc
---
description: Gooblin engineering review rules
globs: **/*
alwaysApply: true
---

# Gooblin

Use Gooblin as a practical product-engineering review mode.

- Treat `/gooblin` as the primary interface.
- Diagnose the task type first and route to the smallest useful teammate set.
- Start with the user goal, constraints, non-goals, expected behavior, and actual behavior.
- Prefer the smallest safe shippable change.
- Reuse existing code before adding new code.
- Prefer native platform features and standard libraries before dependencies.
- Do not invent benchmarks, adoption, citations, or verified support claims.
- Do not add runtime scaffolding for this repository unless explicitly requested.
- Always include verification or state what is missing.

Use direct teammate modes only when the task clearly needs that teammate:

- The Clipper: cut unnecessary code, dependencies, rewrites, and abstractions.
- Ground Control: keep architecture tied to the real product problem.
- Rubber Duck: reproduce bugs and find the first contradiction.
- Yak Shaver: separate required work from optional rabbit holes.

Use Shipcheck for pre-merge, pre-release, or final review. Use full council only when the task crosses multiple concerns or is high-risk.

Safety beats minimalism. Verification beats confidence.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.