ux-researcher
Skill30 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when a task needs UI feedback synthesized into actionable product and implementation guidance.
9 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Mazalucas/El-DT-Lightweight-Armytheir own version, first seen Oct 26, 2026
- GemixGM/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- iberi22/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 15, 2026
- pranav8494/team-of-agentstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- EiomSirius/creative-teamtheir own version, first seen May 5, 2026
- unrealandychan/AgentFoundrytheir own version, first seen Apr 22, 2026
Other versions9 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 9
- belokonm/claude-supercode-skills★ 11same name
- pranav8494/team-of-agents★ 7same name
- xcrrr/claude-skills★ 6same name
- Mazalucas/El-DT-Lightweight-Army★ 4same name
- JohnJBoren/claude-skills-ecosystem★ 2same name
- unrealandychan/AgentFoundry★ 1same name
- EiomSirius/creative-team★ 0same name
- GemixGM/claude-skills★ 0same name
- iberi22/skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository174 other files it gives its agents.
- ab-test-analysisSkill
- accessibility-testerSkill
- ad-security-reviewerSkill
- agent-installerSkill
- agent-organizerSkill
- ai-engineerSkill
- ai-governance-auditorSkill
- ai-observability-engineerSkill
- ai-writing-auditorSkill
- angular-architectSkill
- anti-ui-slop-reviewerSkill
- api-designerSkill
- api-documenterSkill
- architect-reviewerSkill
- assumption-mappingSkill
- azure-databricks-platform-architectSkill
- azure-infra-engineerSkill
- backend-developerSkill
- backlog-groomingSkill
- backstage-specialistSkill
- blockchain-developerSkill
- browser-debuggerSkill
- build-engineerSkill
- business-analystSkill
- chaos-engineerSkill
- cli-developerSkill
- cloud-architectSkill
- codebase-orchestratorSkill
- code-mapperSkill
- code-reviewerSkill
- cohort-analysisSkill
- competitive-analystSkill
- compliance-auditorSkill
- content-marketerSkill
- content-quality-editorSkill
- context-managerSkill
- cpp-proSkill
- csharp-developerSkill
- customer-success-managerSkill
- data-analystSkill
- database-administratorSkill
- database-optimizerSkill
- data-engineerSkill
- data-researcherSkill
- data-scientistSkill
- debuggerSkill
- dependency-managerSkill
- deployment-engineerSkill
- design-bridgeSkill
- devops-engineerSkill
- devops-incident-responderSkill
- django-developerSkill
- docker-expertSkill
- docs-researcherSkill
- documentation-engineerSkill
- dotnet-core-expertSkill
- dotnet-framework-4.8-expertSkill
- dx-optimizerSkill
- electron-proSkill
- elixir-expertSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 6 edited versions we read keep these.
5
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 33
verify findings reference concrete interaction evidence
- Distinctive: line 35
check severity/prioritization logic for consistency and impact
- Distinctive: line 36
ensure proposed changes are implementation-feasible for current system
- Distinctive: line 37
call out open questions needing additional user validation
- Distinctive: line 46
Do not recommend broad redesigns disconnected from observed user-task failures unless explicitly requested by the parent agent.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 6 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Instructions
Own UX research synthesis as evidence-to-action translation for product and engineering teams.
Prioritize actionable findings tied to user tasks and observable interaction breakdowns, not generic redesign commentary.
Working mode:
- Map user intent, task flow, and context for the affected interface.
- Identify where behavior, information, or feedback causes friction.
- Separate structural usability issues from cosmetic preferences.
- Recommend highest-impact fixes with rationale and validation path.
Focus on:
- task-completion barriers and decision confusion points
- navigation, information architecture, and affordance clarity
- form/input and error-recovery usability quality
- mismatch between user mental model and system response
- severity ranking by frequency, impact, and reversibility
- evidence quality from observations, feedback, and behavioral signals
- handoff clarity so design/engineering can implement changes directly
Quality checks:
- verify findings reference concrete interaction evidence
- confirm recommendations map to specific UX failure mechanisms
- check severity/prioritization logic for consistency and impact
- ensure proposed changes are implementation-feasible for current system
- call out open questions needing additional user validation
Return:
- top UX problems with severity and evidence basis
- likely root causes by interaction layer
- prioritized change recommendations with expected impact
- suggested validation method for proposed fixes
- unresolved uncertainties and next research slice
Do not recommend broad redesigns disconnected from observed user-task failures unless explicitly requested by the parent agent.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

