research-analyst
Skill30 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when a task needs a structured investigation of a technical topic, implementation approach, or design question.
10 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- ggoosen/Digital-Workforcetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- yigityildiz0/evidence-research-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- yigityildiz0/scientific-agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- yigityildiz0/truth-first-counterargument-skilltheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- drewid74/ai_skillstheir own version, first seen May 20, 2026
- rongarede/claude-skills-researchtheir own version, first seen Mar 27, 2026
Other versions10 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 10
- belokonm/claude-supercode-skills★ 11same name
- drewid74/ai_skills★ 8same name
- nicolasestrem/antigravity-gemini-skills★ 8same name
- rongarede/claude-skills-research★ 3same name
- ggoosen/Digital-Workforce★ 1same name
- GoogleMakesMeBetter/claude-skills-collection★ 1same name
- yigityildiz0/scientific-agent-skills★ 1same name
- yigityildiz0/truth-first-counterargument-skill★ 1same name
- dhriyatinandu-bot/claude-skills★ 0same name
- yigityildiz0/evidence-research-skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository174 other files it gives its agents.
- ab-test-analysisSkill
- accessibility-testerSkill
- ad-security-reviewerSkill
- agent-installerSkill
- agent-organizerSkill
- ai-engineerSkill
- ai-governance-auditorSkill
- ai-observability-engineerSkill
- ai-writing-auditorSkill
- angular-architectSkill
- anti-ui-slop-reviewerSkill
- api-designerSkill
- api-documenterSkill
- architect-reviewerSkill
- assumption-mappingSkill
- azure-databricks-platform-architectSkill
- azure-infra-engineerSkill
- backend-developerSkill
- backlog-groomingSkill
- backstage-specialistSkill
- blockchain-developerSkill
- browser-debuggerSkill
- build-engineerSkill
- business-analystSkill
- chaos-engineerSkill
- cli-developerSkill
- cloud-architectSkill
- codebase-orchestratorSkill
- code-mapperSkill
- code-reviewerSkill
- cohort-analysisSkill
- competitive-analystSkill
- compliance-auditorSkill
- content-marketerSkill
- content-quality-editorSkill
- context-managerSkill
- cpp-proSkill
- csharp-developerSkill
- customer-success-managerSkill
- data-analystSkill
- database-administratorSkill
- database-optimizerSkill
- data-engineerSkill
- data-researcherSkill
- data-scientistSkill
- debuggerSkill
- dependency-managerSkill
- deployment-engineerSkill
- design-bridgeSkill
- devops-engineerSkill
- devops-incident-responderSkill
- django-developerSkill
- docker-expertSkill
- docs-researcherSkill
- documentation-engineerSkill
- dotnet-core-expertSkill
- dotnet-framework-4.8-expertSkill
- dx-optimizerSkill
- electron-proSkill
- elixir-expertSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 8 edited versions we read keep these.
5
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 33
verify each major claim has traceable supporting evidence
- Distinctive: line 35
check for unresolved contradictions across sources
- Distinctive: line 36
ensure implications are practical for execution, not abstract
- Distinctive: line 37
call out key unknowns that could invert the recommendation
- Distinctive: line 46
Do not overstate certainty or force a recommendation when evidence is insufficient unless explicitly requested by the parent agent.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 8 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Instructions
Own structured research as decision-ready investigation with explicit evidence quality.
Convert broad technical questions into clear conclusions, uncertainty boundaries, and next actions.
Working mode:
- Define investigation question, context constraints, and decision objective.
- Gather and prioritize evidence from highest-quality sources.
- Synthesize findings into claims with confidence levels and caveats.
- Provide recommendation only when evidence strength is sufficient.
Focus on:
- problem framing and scope discipline for investigation efficiency
- source quality and relevance ranking
- separation of observed facts, inference, and opinion
- tradeoff analysis tied to implementation or architectural consequences
- constraint awareness from repository/product context
- uncertainty articulation and risk of incorrect decision
- actionable next step when evidence is incomplete
Quality checks:
- verify each major claim has traceable supporting evidence
- confirm recommendation strength matches confidence level
- check for unresolved contradictions across sources
- ensure implications are practical for execution, not abstract
- call out key unknowns that could invert the recommendation
Return:
- structured summary of findings by theme
- confidence-rated key claims
- recommendation (or explicit no-recommendation) with rationale
- open questions and high-impact unknowns
- next evidence-gathering step
Do not overstate certainty or force a recommendation when evidence is insufficient unless explicitly requested by the parent agent.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

