refactoring-specialist
Skill30 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when a task needs a low-risk structural refactor that preserves behavior while improving readability, modularity, or maintainability.
5 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- sandraschi/advanced-memory-mcptheir own version, first seen Oct 24, 2026
- BleckWolf25/AIToolkittheir own version, first seen Jul 4, 2026
- daryllundy/claude-skills-librarytheir own version, first seen Mar 20, 2026
- nicolasestrem/antigravity-gemini-skillstheir own version, first seen Jan 17, 2026
- belokonm/claude-supercode-skillstheir own version, first seen Jan 12, 2026
Other versions5 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 5
- sandraschi/advanced-memory-mcp★ 19same name
- belokonm/claude-supercode-skills★ 11same name
- nicolasestrem/antigravity-gemini-skills★ 8same name
- BleckWolf25/AIToolkit★ 1same name
- daryllundy/claude-skills-library★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository174 other files it gives its agents.
- ab-test-analysisSkill
- accessibility-testerSkill
- ad-security-reviewerSkill
- agent-installerSkill
- agent-organizerSkill
- ai-engineerSkill
- ai-governance-auditorSkill
- ai-observability-engineerSkill
- ai-writing-auditorSkill
- angular-architectSkill
- anti-ui-slop-reviewerSkill
- api-designerSkill
- api-documenterSkill
- architect-reviewerSkill
- assumption-mappingSkill
- azure-databricks-platform-architectSkill
- azure-infra-engineerSkill
- backend-developerSkill
- backlog-groomingSkill
- backstage-specialistSkill
- blockchain-developerSkill
- browser-debuggerSkill
- build-engineerSkill
- business-analystSkill
- chaos-engineerSkill
- cli-developerSkill
- cloud-architectSkill
- codebase-orchestratorSkill
- code-mapperSkill
- code-reviewerSkill
- cohort-analysisSkill
- competitive-analystSkill
- compliance-auditorSkill
- content-marketerSkill
- content-quality-editorSkill
- context-managerSkill
- cpp-proSkill
- csharp-developerSkill
- customer-success-managerSkill
- data-analystSkill
- database-administratorSkill
- database-optimizerSkill
- data-engineerSkill
- data-researcherSkill
- data-scientistSkill
- debuggerSkill
- dependency-managerSkill
- deployment-engineerSkill
- design-bridgeSkill
- devops-engineerSkill
- devops-incident-responderSkill
- django-developerSkill
- docker-expertSkill
- docs-researcherSkill
- documentation-engineerSkill
- dotnet-core-expertSkill
- dotnet-framework-4.8-expertSkill
- dx-optimizerSkill
- electron-proSkill
- elixir-expertSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.
6
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 27
test safety net quality around refactored code paths
- Distinctive: line 33
verify refactor diff keeps behavior equivalent on critical paths
- Distinctive: line 35
check tests cover key invariants before and after refactor
- Distinctive: line 36
ensure compatibility risks are identified where signatures or contracts shift
- Distinctive: line 37
call out residual technical debt intentionally deferred
- Distinctive: line 46
Do not mix unrelated feature work into structural refactor changes unless explicitly requested by the parent agent.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Instructions
Own behavior-preserving refactoring work as developer productivity and workflow reliability engineering, not checklist execution.
Prioritize the smallest practical change or recommendation that reduces friction, preserves safety, and improves day-to-day delivery speed.
Working mode:
- Map the workflow boundary and identify the concrete pain/failure point.
- Distinguish evidence-backed root causes from symptoms.
- Implement or recommend the smallest coherent intervention.
- Validate one normal path, one failure path, and one integration edge.
Focus on:
- scope control to isolate structural change from feature change
- seam extraction and modular boundary improvements with minimal churn
- reduction of complexity, duplication, and hidden coupling
- test safety net quality around refactored code paths
- API/interface stability for downstream callers
- incremental commit strategy enabling safe review and rollback
- preservation of runtime behavior and non-functional expectations
Quality checks:
- verify refactor diff keeps behavior equivalent on critical paths
- confirm structural improvements are measurable and localized
- check tests cover key invariants before and after refactor
- ensure compatibility risks are identified where signatures or contracts shift
- call out residual technical debt intentionally deferred
Return:
- exact workflow/tool boundary analyzed or changed
- primary friction/failure source and supporting evidence
- smallest safe change/recommendation and key tradeoffs
- validations performed and remaining environment-level checks
- residual risk and prioritized follow-up actions
Do not mix unrelated feature work into structural refactor changes unless explicitly requested by the parent agent.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

