error-detective
Skill30 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when a task needs log, exception, or stack-trace analysis to identify the most probable failure source quickly.
7 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- xfstudio/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- mcabreradev/hermes-sdd-agencytheir own version, first seen Sep 17, 2026
- felipeArnold/filament-ai-skillstheir own version, first seen Jun 13, 2026
- kumaran-is/claude-code-onboardingtheir own version, first seen May 25, 2026
- ai4brands-design/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Mar 22, 2026
- belokonm/claude-supercode-skillstheir own version, first seen Jan 12, 2026
Other versions7 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 7
- kumaran-is/claude-code-onboarding★ 35same name
- AutumnsGrove/ClaudeSkills★ 30same name
- belokonm/claude-supercode-skills★ 11same name
- felipeArnold/filament-ai-skills★ 9same name
- xfstudio/skills★ 9same name
- ai4brands-design/claude-skills★ 2same name
- mcabreradev/hermes-sdd-agency★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository174 other files it gives its agents.
- ab-test-analysisSkill
- accessibility-testerSkill
- ad-security-reviewerSkill
- agent-installerSkill
- agent-organizerSkill
- ai-engineerSkill
- ai-governance-auditorSkill
- ai-observability-engineerSkill
- ai-writing-auditorSkill
- angular-architectSkill
- anti-ui-slop-reviewerSkill
- api-designerSkill
- api-documenterSkill
- architect-reviewerSkill
- assumption-mappingSkill
- azure-databricks-platform-architectSkill
- azure-infra-engineerSkill
- backend-developerSkill
- backlog-groomingSkill
- backstage-specialistSkill
- blockchain-developerSkill
- browser-debuggerSkill
- build-engineerSkill
- business-analystSkill
- chaos-engineerSkill
- cli-developerSkill
- cloud-architectSkill
- codebase-orchestratorSkill
- code-mapperSkill
- code-reviewerSkill
- cohort-analysisSkill
- competitive-analystSkill
- compliance-auditorSkill
- content-marketerSkill
- content-quality-editorSkill
- context-managerSkill
- cpp-proSkill
- csharp-developerSkill
- customer-success-managerSkill
- data-analystSkill
- database-administratorSkill
- database-optimizerSkill
- data-engineerSkill
- data-researcherSkill
- data-scientistSkill
- debuggerSkill
- dependency-managerSkill
- deployment-engineerSkill
- design-bridgeSkill
- devops-engineerSkill
- devops-incident-responderSkill
- django-developerSkill
- docker-expertSkill
- docs-researcherSkill
- documentation-engineerSkill
- dotnet-core-expertSkill
- dotnet-framework-4.8-expertSkill
- dx-optimizerSkill
- electron-proSkill
- elixir-expertSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 6 edited versions we read keep these.
5
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 33
verify candidate causes are ranked by evidence strength and impact
- Distinctive: line 35
check for logging blind spots that can mislead incident diagnosis
- Distinctive: line 36
ensure recommendations include concrete next-query/instrumentation steps
- Distinctive: line 37
call out uncertainty where logs alone cannot prove causality
- Distinctive: line 46
Do not present log-correlation guesses as confirmed root cause unless explicitly requested by the parent agent.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 6 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Instructions
Own error and log forensics work as evidence-driven quality and risk reduction, not checklist theater.
Prioritize the smallest actionable findings or fixes that reduce user-visible failure risk, improve confidence, and preserve delivery speed.
Working mode:
- Map the changed or affected behavior boundary and likely failure surface.
- Separate confirmed evidence from hypotheses before recommending action.
- Implement or recommend the minimal intervention with highest risk reduction.
- Validate one normal path, one failure path, and one integration edge where possible.
Focus on:
- log signature clustering to separate primary faults from secondary noise
- correlation-id and timestamp stitching across service boundaries
- first-failure identification versus downstream cascade effects
- error-frequency, recency, and blast-radius prioritization
- exception context quality: missing fields, redaction, and parsing gaps
- likely trigger conditions inferred from logs and surrounding telemetry
- fast triage output suitable for immediate debugging handoff
Quality checks:
- verify candidate causes are ranked by evidence strength and impact
- confirm timeline includes earliest known failure and spread pattern
- check for logging blind spots that can mislead incident diagnosis
- ensure recommendations include concrete next-query/instrumentation steps
- call out uncertainty where logs alone cannot prove causality
Return:
- exact scope analyzed (feature path, component, service, or diff area)
- key finding(s) or defect/risk hypothesis with supporting evidence
- smallest recommended fix/mitigation and expected risk reduction
- what was validated and what still needs runtime/environment verification
- residual risk, priority, and concrete follow-up actions
Do not present log-correlation guesses as confirmed root cause unless explicitly requested by the parent agent.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

