agentleFS
jscott3201jscott3201/yet-more-skills/skills/ui-accessibility/SKILL.md

ui-accessibility

Skill4 starsChanged 2 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Implement or audit keyboard, focus, semantic controls, form feedback, responsive accessibility, and non-visual alternatives in UI work. Automated checks are evidence, not complete compliance.

4 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 4 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 4

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Prefer native controls and semantic structure.

    line 11
  2. Distinctive:

    Check reflow/zoom, target size and spacing, contrast, color-independent status, long labels, supported themes, and reduced motion.

    line 26
  3. Distinctive:

    Run the available automated checks and manual keyboard/browser checks separately.

    line 41
  4. Distinctive:

    Read practice notes and sources only when the task needs more depth.

    line 48

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 4 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

UI Accessibility

Start with the user task

Identify the critical workflow, its expected reading order, and how it works without a mouse. Prefer native controls and semantic structure. Add ARIA for a defined interaction pattern, not as decoration or a substitute for missing behavior. Reuse accessible local primitives while testing their composition in the actual page.

Inspect the full interaction

Controls need meaningful accessible names; forms need associated labels, instructions, and errors. Support visible focus, logical Tab order, keyboard activation, and appropriate focus movement after navigation or dialogs. Modal focus must remain within the modal and return to the appropriate control or next logical workflow location on close. Do not hide a focused node.

Match combobox, menu, tabs, and grid behavior to the relevant pattern. A visual table does not automatically require role=grid. Preserve text editing keys and native input behavior. Make icon-only controls understandable and ensure tooltips are not the only label or instruction.

Check reflow/zoom, target size and spacing, contrast, color-independent status, long labels, supported themes, and reduced motion. Avoid flashing or unnecessary autonomous motion. Critical status announcements should be useful and restrained rather than streaming every telemetry tick through an assertive live region.

Keep complex views accessible

Large tables and virtualized lists need usable keyboard navigation and truthful row/selection information. Graphs, charts, and 3D views need a practical structured alternative for core information and actions. Do not leave configuration possible only through drag and drop.

Check focused controls underneath sticky headers, footers, and overlapping panels. Keyboard support alone does not establish a usable non-dragging pointer path: provide an appropriate click/tap alternative for dragging interactions unless a relevant exception applies. Exercise both paths, including graph connections and list reordering. See focus and dragging checks for the WCAG distinctions.

Gather honest evidence

Run the available automated checks and manual keyboard/browser checks separately. Use screen-reader testing for the flows whose semantics cannot be established otherwise, or explicitly mark that coverage unrun. A zero axe report or passing screenshot is not a claim of complete WCAG conformance. Report concrete barriers, affected tasks, and reproducible fixes.

Further guidance

Read practice notes and sources only when the task needs more depth.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.