ui-accessibility
Skill4 starsChanged 2 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Implement or audit keyboard, focus, semantic controls, form feedback, responsive accessibility, and non-visual alternatives in UI work. Automated checks are evidence, not complete compliance.
4 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- dmoreq/agent-grimoiretheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- JetBrains/intellij-communitytheir own version, first seen Nov 7, 2026
- DetachHead/rebasedtheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- thakur698/universal-ui-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 5, 2026
Other versions4 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 4
- JetBrains/intellij-community★ 21ksame name
- DetachHead/rebased★ 6.5ksame name
- thakur698/universal-ui-skills★ 5same name
- dmoreq/agent-grimoire★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository81 other files it gives its agents.
- agent-cli-designSkill
- agent-tool-boundariesSkill
- behavior-first-implementationSkill
- bounded-prototypeSkill
- bounded-pr-sliceSkill
- building-fdd-validationSkill
- context-efficiencySkill
- cross-language-contractsSkill
- cross-platform-agent-instructionsSkill
- design-interviewSkill
- diagnosis-loopSkill
- domain-languageSkill
- edge-cloud-syncSkill
- handoff-continuitySkill
- immutable-pr-reviewSkill
- memory-context-hygieneSkill
- module-designSkill
- orchestrateSkill
- owner-decision-gateSkill
- parallel-portfolioSkill
- pr-gate-loopSkill
- pyo3-async-lifecycleSkill
- pyo3-buffer-performanceSkill
- pyo3-free-threadingSkill
- pyo3-ownership-errorsSkill
- pyo3-wheel-releaseSkill
- python-api-typingSkill
- python-async-concurrencySkill
- python-ci-releaseSkill
- python-data-boundariesSkill
- python-packaging-environmentsSkill
- python-performanceSkill
- python-pytestSkill
- python-reviewSkill
- python-test-designSkill
- python-threading-workersSkill
- python-workflowSkill
- react-components-stateSkill
- react-performanceSkill
- repository-groundingSkill
- rust-api-designSkill
- rust-async-concurrencySkill
- rust-build-diagnosticsSkill
- rust-ci-releaseSkill
- rust-memory-layoutSkill
- rust-nextestSkill
- rust-numerics-simdSkill
- rust-performanceSkill
- rust-protocol-codecsSkill
- rust-python-bindingsSkill
- rust-reviewSkill
- rust-storage-durabilitySkill
- rust-test-designSkill
- rust-unsafe-ffiSkill
- rust-workflowSkill
- rust-workspace-dependenciesSkill
- shadcn-react-componentsSkill
- shadcn-svelte-componentsSkill
- simplify-existing-codeSkill
- source-verificationSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 4 edited versions we read keep these.
4
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 11
Prefer native controls and semantic structure.
- Distinctive: line 26
Check reflow/zoom, target size and spacing, contrast, color-independent status, long labels, supported themes, and reduced motion.
- Distinctive: line 41
Run the available automated checks and manual keyboard/browser checks separately.
- Distinctive: line 48
Read practice notes and sources only when the task needs more depth.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 4 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
UI Accessibility
Start with the user task
Identify the critical workflow, its expected reading order, and how it works without a mouse. Prefer native controls and semantic structure. Add ARIA for a defined interaction pattern, not as decoration or a substitute for missing behavior. Reuse accessible local primitives while testing their composition in the actual page.
Inspect the full interaction
Controls need meaningful accessible names; forms need associated labels, instructions, and errors. Support visible focus, logical Tab order, keyboard activation, and appropriate focus movement after navigation or dialogs. Modal focus must remain within the modal and return to the appropriate control or next logical workflow location on close. Do not hide a focused node.
Match combobox, menu, tabs, and grid behavior to the relevant pattern. A visual table does not
automatically require role=grid. Preserve text editing keys and native input behavior. Make
icon-only controls understandable and ensure tooltips are not the only label or instruction.
Check reflow/zoom, target size and spacing, contrast, color-independent status, long labels, supported themes, and reduced motion. Avoid flashing or unnecessary autonomous motion. Critical status announcements should be useful and restrained rather than streaming every telemetry tick through an assertive live region.
Keep complex views accessible
Large tables and virtualized lists need usable keyboard navigation and truthful row/selection information. Graphs, charts, and 3D views need a practical structured alternative for core information and actions. Do not leave configuration possible only through drag and drop.
Check focused controls underneath sticky headers, footers, and overlapping panels. Keyboard support alone does not establish a usable non-dragging pointer path: provide an appropriate click/tap alternative for dragging interactions unless a relevant exception applies. Exercise both paths, including graph connections and list reordering. See focus and dragging checks for the WCAG distinctions.
Gather honest evidence
Run the available automated checks and manual keyboard/browser checks separately. Use screen-reader testing for the flows whose semantics cannot be established otherwise, or explicitly mark that coverage unrun. A zero axe report or passing screenshot is not a claim of complete WCAG conformance. Report concrete barriers, affected tasks, and reproducible fixes.
Further guidance
Read practice notes and sources only when the task needs more depth.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

