setup-container-security
Skill17 starsChanged 10 days agoMITView on GitHub
Harden container images (Containerfile/Dockerfile) for supply-chain security — digest-pinned bases, non-root runtime, verified artifact fetches, hadolint/shellcheck linting, and grype + syft SBOM scanning. Use when a project builds a container image, before publishing an image to a registry, or when auditing container security.
- Pipes a download into a shell
- Reads credentials
- Deletes or force-pushes
- Installs packages
In this repository13 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- analyze-projectSkill
- bootstrap-projectSkill
- graduate-backlogSkill
- harden-github-actionsSkill
- harden-gitlab-ciSkill
- plan-sprintSkill
- setup-adrsSkill
- setup-architecture-as-codeSkill
- setup-git-hooksSkill
- setup-pre-commitSkill
- validate-quality-configSkill
- wrapup-sprintSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
11 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 8 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
8
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 16
When a project builds a container image (has a Containerfile/Dockerfile)
- Distinctive: line 17
Before publishing an image to a registry (a project that ships the image as a release artifact)
- Distinctive: line 18
When auditing container security, or when a supply-chain review flags container gaps
- Distinctive: line 70
Keep the build toolchain out of the shipped image.
- Very specific: line 118
Never curl … | sh an installer, and never fetch a binary/model with no checksum gate.
- Very specific: line 122
Keep .git, secrets, and tests out of the build context (Podman honours .containerignore too):
- Very specific: line 147
Prefer inline, justified waivers over a blanket .hadolint.yaml — they document why each rule is suppressed, at the line it applies to:
- Very specific: line 164
Commit a .grype.yaml policy that fails only on fixable High/Critical — a defensible anti-alert-fatigue gate that auto-resurfaces a finding …
- Very specific: line 174
Run the scan in CI on image build/PR, plus a weekly cron re-scan of the pinned image as a drift backstop.
- Very specific: line 178
Add a HEALTHCHECK. In a distroless image (no shell), probe with the runtime instead of sh:
- Very specific: line 189
Add a docker ecosystem to .github/dependabot.yml so base-image digests get weekly bump PRs (see bootstrap-project), each validated by the …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Setup Container Security
Harden a project's container image against supply-chain attack: pin the base, verify what you fetch, drop privileges, and scan what you ship. OCI-compliant first — target the OCI image spec so the artifact runs on any conformant runtime (podman, Docker, containerd). Build and test distributable images with podman (rootless, daemonless, OCI output by default), and stay Docker-compatible (Dockerfile/Containerfile are interchangeable below).
When to Use
- When a project builds a container image (has a
Containerfile/Dockerfile) - Before publishing an image to a registry (a project that ships the image as a release artifact)
- When auditing container security, or when a supply-chain review flags container gaps
Required Inputs
- The project's
Containerfile/Dockerfile(s) - Base image(s) and target registry
- Whether the project publishes the image (ships it as a release artifact) — gates SBOM-as-release-asset + signing, delegated to
wrapup-sprint
The Threat
A container bakes in a base image, fetched packages/binaries, and a runtime user. A mutable base tag can be repointed upstream; an unverified curl … | install can be swapped; a root runtime turns any escape into host-level access. Hardening: pin, verify, minimize, drop privileges, scan.
Workflow
Step 1: Triage
ls Containerfile Dockerfile **/Dockerfile 2>/dev/null
# Mutable base tags (should be digest-pinned):
grep -nE '^FROM .*:[^@]*$' Containerfile Dockerfile 2>/dev/null
# Runs as root? (no USER, or USER root):
grep -nE '^USER ' Containerfile Dockerfile 2>/dev/null || echo "no USER — root unless the entrypoint drops privileges"
# Unverified fetch-and-install:
grep -nE 'curl.*\|\s*(sh|bash)|wget .*http' Containerfile Dockerfile 2>/dev/nullThe recurring "looks fine at a glance" anti-pattern (a real-world example): a -slim base on a mutable tag, no USER (root runtime), and a build-time binary/model download with no checksum — despite otherwise-good habits (--no-install-recommends, a HEALTHCHECK, a .containerignore). It fails the three load-bearing checks: digest pinning, non-root, and artifact integrity.
Step 2: Pin the base image by digest
Pin every FROM to the base's multi-arch OCI index digest (keep the tag for readability; preserves arm64/amd64):
# To bump: skopeo inspect --raw docker://docker.io/apache/age:<tag> | sha256sum
FROM apache/age:release_PG18_1.7.0@sha256:e7de1717…baf00For a rolling minimal base (e.g. Chainguard), the :latest@sha256:… form lets Dependabot re-pin the digest while tracking the tag:
FROM cgr.dev/chainguard/node:latest@sha256:5280e6…22b3f AS runtimeConfirm you pinned the index, not a per-arch manifest:
podman image inspect <tag> --format '{{range .RepoDigests}}{{println .}}{{end}}'
skopeo inspect --raw docker://…@<digest> # mediaType must be application/vnd.oci.image.index.v1+jsonStep 3: Minimal base, multi-stage build
Keep the build toolchain out of the shipped image. Either a two-stage split with a distroless/Chainguard runtime:
FROM node:22-slim@sha256:… AS build
RUN npm ci --omit=dev --omit=optional --no-audit --no-fund && npm cache clean --force
FROM cgr.dev/chainguard/node:latest@sha256:… AS runtime
COPY --from=build --chown=65532:65532 /app /app…or, when you must patch libs in place (distroless has no apt), a single stage that purges the toolchain in the same RUN layer, always with --no-install-recommends and apt-cache cleanup:
RUN set -eux; apt-get update; \
apt-get install -y --no-install-recommends build-essential …; \
make && make install; \
apt-get purge -y --auto-remove build-essential …; \
rm -rf /var/lib/apt/lists/*Step 4: Run as non-root
Drop privileges with a USER before CMD. Distroless/Chainguard ships a nonroot uid (65532) you can switch to directly:
COPY --from=build --chown=65532:65532 /data /data
USER 65532Context matters: some official bases (e.g. postgres) legitimately start as root and gosu-drop to a service user via their entrypoint — a "runs as root" finding there needs context, not a blind USER that breaks the entrypoint. Document that exception in an ADR rather than forcing a fix.
Step 5: Verify fetched artifacts
Anything downloaded at build time is attack surface — pin and verify:
- Distro/binary
.deb— sha256-verify per arch before install:RUN set -eux; arch="$(dpkg --print-architecture)"; \ case "$arch" in \ arm64) sha256=59dbe75a… ;; amd64) sha256=7637a18a… ;; \ *) echo "no pinned checksum for $arch" >&2; exit 1 ;; esac; \ curl -fsSL -o /tmp/x.deb "https://…/${VERSION}/…_${arch}.deb"; \ echo "${sha256} /tmp/x.deb" | sha256sum -c -; \ apt-get install -y --no-install-recommends /tmp/x.deb - Source builds — clone a pinned git tag, not a branch:
git clone --branch "${VERSION}" --depth 1 …,VERSIONanARG. - Language deps — install from a committed lockfile (
npm ci, mix frommix.lock) — seesetup-git-hooks.
Never curl … | sh an installer, and never fetch a binary/model with no checksum gate.
Step 6: .dockerignore
Keep .git, secrets, and tests out of the build context (Podman honours .containerignore too):
.git
.github
.env
.env.*
CLAUDE.local.md
testStep 7: Lint — hadolint + shellcheck
Lint the Dockerfile with hadolint and build scripts with shellcheck, in both the pre-push hook and CI:
# .lefthook.yml (pre-push)
lint-dockerfile:
glob: "Dockerfile*"
run: hadolint {push_files}
lint-shell:
glob: "*.sh"
run: shellcheck {push_files}Prefer inline, justified waivers over a blanket .hadolint.yaml — they document why each rule is suppressed, at the line it applies to:
# hadolint ignore=DL3008,DL4006Step 8: Scan — grype + syft SBOM
Scan the built image for known CVEs and generate an SBOM. Export the image to an archive so both run daemonless:
podman save --format oci-archive -o img.tar "$IMAGE" # src="oci-archive:img.tar"
grype "oci-archive:img.tar" # reads .grype.yaml from repo root
syft scan "oci-archive:img.tar" -q \
-o spdx-json=sbom.spdx.json -o cyclonedx-json=sbom.cdx.jsonCommit a .grype.yaml policy that fails only on fixable High/Critical — a defensible anti-alert-fatigue gate that auto-resurfaces a finding when a fix ships:
fail-on-severity: "high"
ignore:
- fix-state: wont-fix
- fix-state: not-fixed
- fix-state: unknownRun the scan in CI on image build/PR, plus a weekly cron re-scan of the pinned image as a drift backstop.
Step 9: HEALTHCHECK
Add a HEALTHCHECK. In a distroless image (no shell), probe with the runtime instead of sh:
HEALTHCHECK --interval=10s --timeout=3s --retries=6 \
CMD ["/usr/bin/node","-e","require('net').connect(PORT,'127.0.0.1').on('connect',c=>{c.end();process.exit(0)}).on('error',()=>process.exit(1))"]Note: Podman's default OCI image format drops HEALTHCHECK — carry a duplicate in compose.yaml for Compose users.
Step 10: Automate digest bumps
Add a docker ecosystem to .github/dependabot.yml so base-image digests get weekly bump PRs (see bootstrap-project), each validated by the grype scan job.
Step 11: Publishing and ADR
For projects that publish the image: attach the SBOM as a release asset and sign the image with cosign keyless — delegated to wrapup-sprint's release-provenance step. Record the container-security decisions (which checks run, the grype-policy rationale, and any documented exceptions like a base-digest-pin or gosu-drop root) in an ADR.
Grounding: EU CRA (SBOM, integrity) and OpenSSF supply-chain hardening. The base-digest-pin +
.debsha256 + git-tag builds close the "install whatever arrives over the network" gap; the fixable-only grype policy keeps the gate actionable.
Outputs
- Every
FROMdigest-pinned (multi-arch index), with a bump-command comment - Multi-stage or same-layer-purge build;
--no-install-recommends+ apt cleanup USERdrops privileges beforeCMD(or the root exception is ADR-documented)- Fetched
.deb/binaries sha256-verified; source builds git-tag-pinned; nocurl | sh .dockerignore/.containerignoreexcludes.git, secrets, tests- hadolint + shellcheck in pre-push + CI (inline justified ignores)
.grype.yaml(fixable-only policy) + grype scan in CI + weekly re-scan- syft SBOM (SPDX + CycloneDX)
HEALTHCHECKdockerDependabot ecosystem for digest bumps- ADR recording the container-security checks and documented exceptions
Validation
# No mutable base tags:
grep -nE '^FROM .*:[^@]*$' Dockerfile Containerfile 2>/dev/null && echo "UNPINNED base above" || echo "bases pinned"
# Non-root (or documented exception):
grep -qE '^USER ' Dockerfile Containerfile || echo "no USER — confirm the entrypoint drops privileges"
# Scan passes under policy + SBOM produced:
grype "oci-archive:img.tar"
test -s sbom.spdx.json && test -s sbom.cdx.json && echo "SBOM ok"Related Skills
harden-github-actions- harden the image build/publish workflow (SHA-pin actions, least-privilege, cosign-installer)wrapup-sprint- release-time SBOM + cosign signing for published imagessetup-git-hooks- lockfile enforcement and the hadolint/shellcheck hooksbootstrap-project- the distribution profile (whether the project publishes artifacts); Dependabot configsetup-adrs- record the container-security checks and documented exceptions
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

