agentleFS
jqaisystemsjqaisystems/jqai-ai-skills/skills/code-deduplicator/SKILL.md

code-deduplicator

Skill3 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub

Find duplicated code introduced or touched in the current session, then safely consolidate exact or low-risk duplicates while preserving behavior.

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

22 rules. About 0 are common, 16 are distinctive, and 6 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈16

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 6

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Do not rewrite unrelated code, change public APIs casually, or revert user work.

    line 10
  2. Distinctive:

    Run git diff HEAD and git status to get the full picture of what was added or modified in this session.

    line 14
  3. Very specific:

    If the diff is empty (everything is committed), run git diff HEAD~5..HEAD to cover recent session commits.

    line 20
  4. Distinctive:

    Search for duplication in components and layouts:

    line 25
  5. Very specific:

    Check for copy-pasted layout components (layout.tsx files with near-identical structure)

    line 28
  6. Distinctive:

    Check for duplicated page-level patterns (similar data fetching, similar error boundaries, similar loading states)

    line 29
  7. Distinctive:

    Search for duplication in functions and utilities:

    line 33
  8. Very specific:

    Look for inline logic that duplicates existing utilities (e.g., hand-rolled formatDate when one exists in lib/)

    line 36
  9. Distinctive:

    Check for duplicated fetch patterns, error handling wrappers, and auth checks

    line 37
  10. Distinctive:

    Search for duplication in API routes and server logic:

    line 41
  11. Distinctive:

    Check for duplicated middleware logic (auth, rate limiting, validation)

    line 44
  12. Distinctive:

    If no duplication is found, say so and stop.

    line 55
  13. Distinctive:

    Exact duplicates: Delete the new code, import the existing version, update all references.

    line 61
  14. Distinctive:

    When extracting shared code:

    line 65
  15. Very specific:

    Place utilities in lib/ or utils/ (whichever the project uses)

    line 66
  16. Very specific:

    Place shared components in components/shared/ or components/ui/ (whichever exists)

    line 67
  17. Very specific:

    Place shared hooks in hooks/

    line 68
  18. Distinctive:

    Do not create new directories if equivalent ones already exist

    line 69
  19. Distinctive:

    Do not refactor across ownership boundaries unless the existing codebase already has a shared location for that pattern

    line 70
  20. Distinctive:

    If a deduplication would touch many files or alter behavior, leave a finding instead of editing

    line 71
  21. Distinctive:

    Run the relevant tests and lint/type checks for the changed area.

    line 77
  22. Distinctive:

    If tests or lint fail, fix the issues.

    line 79

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Code Deduplicator

You are a careful deduplication agent. Find duplication introduced or touched in the current session, then consolidate only when the refactor is low-risk and preserves existing behavior.

Do not rewrite unrelated code, change public APIs casually, or revert user work. If a duplication finding is risky or broad, report it instead of forcing a refactor.

Step 1: Identify What Changed

Run git diff HEAD and git status to get the full picture of what was added or modified in this session. Parse the diff to extract:

  • New functions, components, hooks, constants, types, and utilities
  • New inline logic patterns (string manipulation, fetch calls, validation, type guards, env checks, path handling)
  • New API route handlers and middleware

If the diff is empty (everything is committed), run git diff HEAD~5..HEAD to cover recent session commits.

Step 2: Scan for Duplication (Run 3 Tasks in Parallel)

Task 1: Component & Layout Duplication

Search for duplication in components and layouts:

  • Glob for **/*.tsx, **/*.jsx files
  • For each new component from the diff, Grep the codebase for components with similar names, similar prop signatures, or similar JSX structure
  • Check for copy-pasted layout components (layout.tsx files with near-identical structure)
  • Check for duplicated page-level patterns (similar data fetching, similar error boundaries, similar loading states)
  • Flag components that wrap the same underlying element with minor style/prop differences

Task 2: Logic & Utility Duplication

Search for duplication in functions and utilities:

  • Glob for **/*.ts, **/*.tsx, **/*.js files
  • For each new utility/hook/function from the diff, Grep the codebase for similar implementations
  • Look for inline logic that duplicates existing utilities (e.g., hand-rolled formatDate when one exists in lib/)
  • Check for duplicated fetch patterns, error handling wrappers, and auth checks
  • Flag near-identical hooks that differ only in endpoint or return shape

Task 3: API & Server Duplication

Search for duplication in API routes and server logic:

  • Glob for **/api/**/*.ts, **/routes/**/*.ts, **/middleware/**/*.ts
  • For each new route handler from the diff, Grep for similar route patterns
  • Check for duplicated middleware logic (auth, rate limiting, validation)
  • Flag handlers that share identical request parsing or response shaping logic

Step 3: Aggregate Findings

Collect results from all three tasks. For each finding, categorize as:

  1. Exact duplicate - same logic exists elsewhere. Use the existing one when references can be updated safely.
  2. Near duplicate - similar logic with minor differences. Extract a shared version only if the abstraction is clear and local patterns support it.
  3. Inline reimplementation - hand-rolled logic that an existing utility already handles. Replace with the utility call when behavior matches.

If no duplication is found, say so and stop. Do not invent problems.

Step 4: Refactor Safely

For each safe finding, apply the fix directly:

  • Exact duplicates: Delete the new code, import the existing version, update all references.
  • Near duplicates: Extract a shared function/component/hook to the appropriate shared directory (utils/, hooks/, components/shared/, lib/). Update all call sites to use the shared version.
  • Inline reimplementations: Replace inline code with calls to the existing utility. Add imports.

When extracting shared code:

  • Place utilities in lib/ or utils/ (whichever the project uses)
  • Place shared components in components/shared/ or components/ui/ (whichever exists)
  • Place shared hooks in hooks/
  • Do not create new directories if equivalent ones already exist
  • Do not refactor across ownership boundaries unless the existing codebase already has a shared location for that pattern
  • If a deduplication would touch many files or alter behavior, leave a finding instead of editing

Step 5: Verify

Detect the project's verification commands from package scripts, README, Makefile, pyproject, or equivalent local configuration. Prefer existing commands over inventing new ones.

Run the relevant tests and lint/type checks for the changed area. If no verification command is discoverable, say that clearly and list the manual checks performed.

If tests or lint fail, fix the issues. The codebase must be in a passing state when you are done.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.