first-client-90-day-plan
Skill12 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Build or revise a 90-day sales execution plan for an AI automation freelancer or agency seeking its first paid client. Use for the end-to-end journey from buyer validation to paid pilot, or adapt it to an internal sponsor-backed pilot.
In this repository110 other files it gives its agents.
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- 30mpc-voiceSkill
- adam-robinson-voiceSkill
- ai-workflow-architectSkill
- alex-costa-grooming-advisorSkill
- alex-garcia-voiceSkill
- alex-hormozi-voiceSkill
- amanda-natividad-voiceSkill
- andrew-gazdecki-voiceSkill
- andrew-wilkinson-voiceSkill
- ann-handley-voiceSkill
- april-dunford-voiceSkill
- automation-pricing-and-closeSkill
- balaji-srinivasan-voiceSkill
- barbara-corcoran-voiceSkill
- bob-hoffman-voiceSkill
- byron-sharp-voiceSkill
- chamath-strategy-coachSkill
- chris-orlob-voiceSkill
- chris-walker-voiceSkill
- claude-code-build-auditorSkill
- claude-hopkins-voiceSkill
- codie-sanchez-voiceSkill
- daniel-priestley-voiceSkill
- dan-kennedy-voiceSkill
- dan-koe-voiceSkill
- dave-gerhardt-voiceSkill
- david-ogilvy-voiceSkill
- david-perell-voiceSkill
- dhh-voiceSkill
- first-client-offer-builderSkill
- first-meeting-30-day-sprintSkill
- fletch-pmm-voiceSkill
- founder-content-engineSkill
- gary-bencivenga-voiceSkill
- gary-halbert-voiceSkill
- gary-vaynerchuk-voiceSkill
- george-mack-voiceSkill
- grant-cardone-voiceSkill
- greg-isenberg-voiceSkill
- guillaume-moubeche-voiceSkill
- harry-dry-voiceSkill
- hormozi-hooksSkill
- hormozi-pitchSkill
- hundred-million-offersSkill
- icp-validation-sprintSkill
- jack-butcher-voiceSkill
- jasmin-alic-voiceSkill
- jason-fried-voiceSkill
- jay-clouse-voiceSkill
- jen-allen-knuth-voiceSkill
- jesse-itzler-voiceSkill
- john-carlton-voiceSkill
- josh-braun-voiceSkill
- julian-shapiro-voiceSkill
- justin-welsh-voiceSkill
- katelyn-bourgoin-voiceSkill
- kellen-copy-coachSkill
- kevin-dorsey-voiceSkill
- kevin-oleary-voiceSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 22
Use these overlapping windows as a starting schedule.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
First Client in 90 Days
Turn the user's skills, access to buyers, and available hours into a path toward a first paid engagement. Start with the earliest unproven sales step and produce the asset needed to test it today. Do not make a beginner finish a course before talking to buyers.
Establish the starting point
Find the lane (freelancer, agency, or internal operator), start date, weekly sales hours, delivery capability, existing buyer access, proof, current opportunities, and desired engagement. Separate the seller's lane from the buyer's role. Default to a first paid pilot with a bounded scope when a recurring service is unproven. Use a retainer only when ongoing work creates ongoing value.
Define success before planning: for an external sale, signed scope plus the agreed first payment actually received; record contract and payment evidence separately. For an operator, named sponsor approval, resources, success metric, and a pilot start date. A friendly reply, scheduled call, verbal yes, proposal, or unpaid demo is an intermediate event.
Build an evidence-gated calendar
Use these overlapping windows as a starting schedule. Adjust for the user's capacity and existing evidence; never restart validated work just to follow the calendar.
| Window | Work and concrete output | Evidence to advance |
| Days 1-7 | One ICP sentence, five disqualifiers, ten buyer conversations | Repeated pain, ability to fund, reachable decision path; otherwise rewrite or reject |
| Days 8-14 | One offer paragraph, bounded deliverables and risk reversal | Three real say-it-back reactions; feasible delivery and explicit unknowns |
| Days 15-30 | One primary channel, 25-50 sourced prospects, first small outreach test | Relevant replies and a buyer-confirmed qualified meeting; log actual counts |
| Days 31-60 | Discovery, costed pilot, pricing discussion, follow-up | Buyer-confirmed problem, decision process, and a dated next step |
| Days 61-90 | Close suitable opportunities, deliver a first win, review ongoing needs | Paid engagement and agreed acceptance evidence; retainer only if justified |
Prepare discovery and a price as soon as a buyer is ready, even in week one. If no meeting is booked by day 30, diagnose the earliest failing step instead of pretending to enter a closing phase. If no client is won by day 90, report the actual outcome and the evidence-based next experiment.
Choose the next skill only if available and useful
All steps can be completed here using the table above. Within this collection, recommend icp-validation-sprint, first-client-offer-builder, or first-meeting-30-day-sprint for deeper early-stage work. Later use sales-discovery-call-coach, automation-pricing-and-close, sales-follow-up-planner, and sales-objection-sorter. Use weekly-sales-loop for execution and sales-pipeline-clinic for diagnosis. Do not require installation of other skills or run all of them for a narrow question.
Make workload and funnel math honest
Budget time for list research, conversation preparation, outreach, replies, calls, and delivery. Reserve same-day reply handling before filling every hour with sends. If illustrative conversion rates help, label them as scenarios, show the assumptions, and replace them with observed cohort rates. Do not backsolve a quota from made-up industry benchmarks or multiply total message touches as though they were unique prospects.
Track sourced prospects, unique people contacted, replies, positive replies, meetings booked, meetings held, qualified opportunities, proposals, signed agreements, and first payments. Each stage needs a definition and actual evidence. Never count an unanswered invitation as a booking.
Deliver
- Goal, start date, constraints, and current bottleneck.
- A dated plan with weekly tasks, realistic time budgets, artifacts, and decision gates.
- The next usable asset: an ICP sentence, research invitation, offer paragraph, or deal next-step script.
- A simple scorecard with current actuals, explicit unknowns, and next review date.
- A seven-day experiment with a continue/change/stop rule and today's first action.
At a progress review, compare actuals to the previous plan, retain learning, and change the smallest relevant variable. Avoid replacing an entire niche and offer because one small batch received no replies.
Working agreement
Use context already supplied. Ask only for missing facts that change the next decision, preferably in one short batch, then make a useful first draft. Label assumptions and distinguish buyer evidence from your interpretation. Never invent interviews, prospect facts, results, testimonials, budget, or meetings. A target date is a planning goal, not a promised commercial outcome. Use plain sentences and normal hyphens in generated copy.
Create drafts and plans within the requested scope. Sending messages, booking meetings, publishing, changing a CRM, or committing the user to commercial terms requires authorization for that action. A request for advice alone does not authorize execution. Work from pasted notes if tools are unavailable; identify what remains unverified.
Source
Agent J Sales 101 curriculum-deck.pdf, pages 2-15; week1-icp-deck.pdf, pages 3-10; week2-offer-deck.pdf, pages 4-12. The 90-day schedule and stage gates below are this skill's implementation of the curriculum, not a timeline promised by the decks. These are practical adaptations by John Peslar AI, not endorsements by the referenced educators. The skill is self-contained; the original decks are not required at runtime.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

