agentleFS
josixjosix/agent-flow/skills/prompt-refinement/SKILL.md

prompt-refinement

Skill8 starsChanged 17 days agoMITView on GitHub

This skill should be used when the user provides a vague request, asks to clarify requirements, structure a task, or refine a prompt for multi-agent orchestration.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈5

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Ensure tasks entering the orchestration pipeline have:

    line 15
  2. Distinctive:

    Ask First, Act Second: When genuinely ambiguous, clarify before proceeding

    line 32
  3. Distinctive:

    One Question at a Time: Never overwhelm users with multiple clarification requests

    line 33
  4. Very specific:

    After capturing all five fields, the orchestrator classifies task_complexity (trivial/exploratory/implementation/complex/research) and …

    line 69
  5. Distinctive:

    Test: Add or update tests

    line 76
  6. Distinctive:

    Wait for response (max 2 rounds)

    line 203

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Prompt Refinement

Overview

Prompt refinement transforms ambiguous or incomplete user requests into clear, structured task specifications suitable for multi-agent orchestration. This skill bridges natural language input and the precise specifications required by downstream agents.

Purpose

Ensure tasks entering the orchestration pipeline have:

  • Clear Objectives: A single, well-defined goal that can be verified
  • Actionable Steps: Concrete actions that agents can execute
  • Measurable Outcomes: Success criteria that verification agents can check
  • Appropriate Scope: Boundaries that prevent scope creep

When to Use This Skill

Apply prompt refinement when:

  • User input contains ambiguous terms ("fix it", "make it better")
  • The request lacks specific targets (files, components, systems)
  • Multiple interpretations of the request are possible
  • Pre-processing is required for /orchestrate or /plan commands

Key Principles

  1. Ask First, Act Second: When genuinely ambiguous, clarify before proceeding
  2. One Question at a Time: Never overwhelm users with multiple clarification requests
  3. Provide Options: Give concrete choices to speed up clarification
  4. Default Gracefully: Make reasonable assumptions when users don't respond
  5. Preserve Intent: Refinement should clarify, not change the user's goal

Refinement Template

Standard Format

**Goal**: <one-sentence objective stating what will be accomplished>

**Description**: <2-3 sentences providing context and scope>

**Actions**:
1. <specific, atomic action with clear target>
2. <specific, atomic action with clear target>
3. ...

**Constraints**: <what must not be broken, changed, or violated>

**Assumptions**: <what is taken for granted — surfaces risks early>

Template Guidelines

FieldRequirementsExample
GoalSingle sentence, verb-first, specific outcome"Implement rate limiting on /api/users endpoint"
DescriptionContext, scope boundaries"Add rate limiting to prevent API abuse. Limit to 100 req/min per IP."
ActionsNumbered, ordered, atomic steps"1. Explore existing middleware patterns"
ConstraintsNon-negotiable requirements; what must stay intact"Must not alter existing auth cookie format"
AssumptionsPreconditions taken for granted"Redis is already provisioned"

After capturing all five fields, the orchestrator classifies task_complexity (trivial/exploratory/implementation/complex/research) and persists the structured intent to the state file via --set-intent-goal, --set-intent-description, --set-intent-actions, --set-intent-constraints, --set-intent-assumptions, and --set-task-complexity. These values are passed verbatim (no re-summarization) to all downstream agents.

Action Step Pattern

  1. Explore: Investigate existing code, patterns, dependencies
  2. Plan: Design approach based on exploration
  3. Implement: Execute the core changes
  4. Test: Add or update tests
  5. Verify: Confirm implementation meets requirements

Ambiguity Detection

Quick Detection Checklist

A prompt likely needs clarification if:

  • No identifiable action (what to do)
  • No specific target (where to do it)
  • No expected outcome (success criteria)
  • Insufficient context (constraints, environment)

Ambiguity Signals

SignalExampleIssue
Missing scope"fix the bug"Which bug? Where?
Vague outcome"make it better"Better how?
Multiple meanings"update the API"Which endpoint? What change?
Implicit assumptions"deploy it"Where? How?

For detailed ambiguity detection, see references/ambiguity-detection.md.


Clarification Strategy

Question Format

Before I proceed, I need to clarify:

<single focused question>

Options:
A) <most likely option>
B) <second most likely>
C) <third option if applicable>
D) Something else (please specify)

Clarification Rules

RuleRationale
Single questionReduces cognitive load
Concrete optionsSpeeds up response
Max two roundsAvoids frustration
Include escape hatchPrevents forced incorrect choice

When to Clarify vs. Assume

Always Clarify:

  • Could cause data loss
  • Affects security
  • Mutually exclusive interpretations
  • Production system impact

Safe to Assume:

  • Obvious default exists
  • Context suggests intent
  • Low-risk, reversible operations

For detailed clarification strategies, see references/clarification-strategies.md.


Orchestration Detection

Prompts Requiring Orchestration

CategoryExample
Multi-file changes"Add authentication to all routes"
Feature implementations"Implement dark mode"
Bug investigation"Fix the login issue"
Refactoring"Refactor user service"
Integration"Integrate Stripe"

Pass-Through Prompts

CategoryExample
Questions"What does this function do?"
Single-file edits"Add comment to line 42"
Git operations"Commit these changes"
Documentation lookups"Show API endpoints"

Quick Decision

Is it a question about existing code? -> Pass through
Does it require code changes? -> If no, pass through
Is target explicit AND single file? -> Pass through
Otherwise -> Refine for orchestration

For detailed orchestration detection, see references/orchestration-detection.md.


Refinement Process

Step 1: Classify Prompt

Is it orchestration-related?
├── NO -> Pass through unchanged
└── YES -> Continue to Step 2

Step 2: Detect Ambiguity

Check ambiguity signals
├── High ambiguity -> Go to Step 3 (Clarify)
└── Low ambiguity -> Go to Step 4 (Refine)

Step 3: Request Clarification

  1. Identify primary ambiguity
  2. Formulate single focused question
  3. Provide 3-4 concrete options
  4. Wait for response (max 2 rounds)

Step 4: Apply Template

  1. Extract Goal (single sentence, specific)
  2. Build Description (context, scope, constraints)
  3. Decompose Actions (atomic, ordered steps)
  4. Validate completeness

Quick Reference

Ambiguity Score Quick Guide

ScoreAction
0-2Proceed with refinement
3-4State assumption and proceed
5+Ask clarifying question

Short imperative with a concrete target → state assumption and proceed, do not ask.

Refinement Decision Matrix

Prompt TypeAction
Clear + orchestrationRefine to template
Ambiguous + orchestrationClarify then refine
Clear + non-orchestrationPass through
Ambiguous + non-orchestrationMinimal clarification

Additional Resources

Reference Files

  • references/ambiguity-detection.md - Detecting ambiguous prompts
  • references/clarification-strategies.md - Clarification question strategies
  • references/orchestration-detection.md - Orchestration eligibility detection
  • references/refinement-techniques.md - Advanced refinement techniques

Examples

  • examples/refinement-scenarios.md - Worked refinement examples

Related Skills

  • task-classification: Receives refined prompts for complexity assessment
  • agent-behavior-constraints: Ensures refinement stays within agent boundaries
  • verification-gates: Uses refined specifications for verification criteria

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.