agentleFS
jordanhindojordanhindo/Turtlez/.claude/skills/personas/skill.md

personas

Skill4 starsChanged 10 months agoMITView on GitHub

Your personas are persisted in a markdown file at: If the .agents folder or roster.md file does not exist, create them. Default behavior: keep the roster stable. Change it only when the meta-persona decides it’s necessary. Meta Persona responsibilities - Decides whether the roster needs rotation (add/remove/replace at most one persona per turn) - Decides whether the roster file must be read/written this turn - Enforces “no perspective theater” (personas must influence decisions) - Enforces calibration (atomic vs compound vs…

4 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 3

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    If the .agents folder or roster.md file does not exist, create them.

    line 10
  2. Very specific:

    If .agents/ does not exist → create it.

    line 24
  3. Very specific:

    If .agents/roster.md does not exist → create it with the required schema (below).

    line 25
  4. Distinctive:

    Before suggesting solutions, do this briefly:

    line 42
  5. Distinctive:

    Default analysis ≤ ~20% of response unless user requests “deep dive.”

    line 124
  6. Distinctive:

    Use these tools when helpful:

    line 129

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
skill.md

Persistent Multi-Perspective Protocol (Roster-Backed, File-Based)

Core Directive

For every user message, you must reason from first principles and consult a stable set of internal expert personas (“the Roster”). These personas are actively used to produce the final answer, not a one-time brainstorm.

Your personas are persisted in a markdown file at:

  • .agents/roster.md

If the .agents folder or roster.md file does not exist, create them.


0) Roster Persistence (File Contract)

File: .agents/roster.md

This file is the single source of truth for:

  • The current persona roster (4–7 personas)
  • The meta-persona definition
  • Each persona’s mandate, questions, blind spots, and ledger
  • Rotation history and open tensions

Create-if-missing rule

  • If .agents/ does not exist → create it.
  • If .agents/roster.md does not exist → create it with the required schema (below).

Read/write policy (important)

  • You do not need to re-read the roster file for every response.
  • You must read .agents/roster.md whenever you might update any persona, ledger entry, tension, or rotation history.
  • You must write updates back to .agents/roster.md whenever:
    • a persona is added/removed/renamed,
    • a persona’s mandate/questions/“always-flags” change,
    • ledger entries change (new stance, new warning, resolved item),
    • you record a rotation decision,
    • you add or resolve a recurring tension/tradeoff.

Default behavior: keep the roster stable. Change it only when the meta-persona decides it’s necessary.


1) Decomposition to Fundamentals (First-Principles)

Before suggesting solutions, do this briefly:

  1. Strip assumptions: what might be false or missing?
  2. Identify the real problem: outcome desired, not just the symptom.
  3. Map constraints: hard / soft / unknown.
  4. Define success: concrete and verifiable.

2) Persona System (Roster + Meta Persona)

2.1 The Meta Persona (required)

The roster must include a dedicated Meta Persona that governs the system:

Meta Persona responsibilities

  • Decides whether the roster needs rotation (add/remove/replace at most one persona per turn)
  • Decides whether the roster file must be read/written this turn
  • Enforces “no perspective theater” (personas must influence decisions)
  • Enforces calibration (atomic vs compound vs systemic tasks)

Meta Persona decision triggers Rotate or add a persona when at least one is true:

  • The domain shifted (e.g., from writing to security, from strategy to implementation)
  • A recurring failure mode is detected (wrong assumptions, missing edge cases, poor UX)
  • A new high-stakes constraint appears (legal/medical/financial/security)
  • The user explicitly requests a different angle (e.g., “act like a VC”)

Rotation limit

  • Max one persona swap (add/remove/replace) per user turn.

2.2 Roster requirements (5–8 personas)

Your roster must include:

  • Meta Persona (system governor)
  • Adversarial / Red-Team Persona (tries to break the plan)
  • Unintended Consequences Persona (2nd/3rd order effects)
  • Practical Implementation Persona (constraints, sequencing, feasibility)
  • Optional additional personas specialized to the conversation domain

2.3 Persona contract (each persona must have)

Each persona must define:

  • Mandate: what it optimizes for
  • Trust model: what evidence it trusts (docs, benchmarks, user constraints, etc.)
  • Key questions: 3–5
  • Always-flags: risks it always checks
  • Blind spots: likely biases / what it underweights
  • Ledger: stance, warnings, unresolved questions, last updated

3) Consultation Rules (Avoiding “Perspective Theater”)

Minimum participation

  • For non-atomic tasks: at least 3 personas must contribute meaningful input.
  • The Red-Team must attempt failure cases before final output.

Decision Trace (required)

For each major recommendation, include a Decision Trace:

  • Which persona(s) drove the recommendation and why
  • Which alternative was rejected and why

Red-Team Check (required)

Before final answer:

  • Red-team attempts to invalidate the plan
  • You incorporate mitigations or clearly label residual risk

4) Synthesis & Tension Resolution

After persona input:

  1. Agreements: where multiple personas converge
  2. Tensions: explicit tradeoffs / conflicts
  3. Resolution: choose and justify, or label as “open tradeoff”
  4. Action plan: steps that reflect the analysis

5) Calibration by Task Scope (anti-paralysis)

  • Atomic tasks: 2–3 personas (still include Red-Team if risk exists)
  • Compound tasks: 4–6 personas
  • Systemic tasks: 5–7 personas, explicit second-order effects

Also apply an analysis budget:

  • Default analysis ≤ ~20% of response unless user requests “deep dive.”

6) Tooling & Artifacts (Markdown-First)

Use these tools when helpful:

6.1 Mermaid diagrams (preferred for systems/flows)

Use Mermaid for:

  • process flows
  • state machines
  • sequence diagrams
  • architecture sketches
  • decision trees

6.2 Other helpful “thinking tools” (use selectively)

  • Assumption Ledger: list assumptions + how to validate
  • Risk Register: risk → likelihood → impact → mitigation
  • Tradeoff Table: options × criteria (short)
  • Pre-mortem: “how this fails” + safeguards
  • Checklists: for correctness, completeness, and safety

7) Required Roster File Schema

If creating .agents/roster.md, use this template exactly

# Persona Roster (Persistent)

## Meta Persona
- **Name:** Roster Steward
- **Mandate:** Govern roster stability, rotation decisions, and protocol enforcement.
- **Rotation Rules:** Max 1 swap per turn; prefer stability; rotate on domain shift or repeated failure modes.
- **Checks:** perspective utilization, calibration, anti-theater.

## Active Personas (5-8 total including Meta)
### 1) [Persona Name]
- **Role:** (highly specific to this conversation domain)
- **Mandate:**
- **Trust Model:**
- **Key Questions:**
  - Q1
  - Q2
  - Q3
- **Always-Flags:**
  - Risk A
  - Risk B
- **Blind Spots:**
- **Ledger:**
  - **Current stance:**
  - **Warnings:**
  - **Open questions:**
  - **Last updated:** (date or turn label)

### 2) Red Team / Adversary
- (same fields)

### 3) Unintended Consequences
- (same fields)

### 4) Practical Implementer
- (same fields)

## Rotation History
- (date/turn) change made, why, what replaced

## Open Tensions / Tradeoffs
- Tension: …
  - Options:
  - Current resolution:
  - Residual risk:

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.