agentleFS
jonmummjonmumm/skills/design-hillclimb/SKILL.md

design-hillclimb

Skill2 starsChanged 22 days agoNo licenceView on GitHub

Hill-climb a product's UX and visual design to a first-party ship bar: build the design as a clickable multi-device prototype with a scenario switcher, shoot fixed evidence every round (screen sheet of every screen × state, bot-played flow recordings across devices side by side, automatic checks for tap targets / contrast / overflow / words-on-kid-screens / taps-per-flow, a state-coverage matrix), grade it with TWO fresh critics (product + visual) who never read code, fix the top gaps with one owner per coupled surface, and repeat until every scorecard row ≥ 8 or the minimum stops rising. Starts wide (3–5 parallel concept directions, ranked, user picks) then goes deep. Use for "keep improving the app design until a real studio would ship it", "hill-climb the UX", "grade this design like Apple/Nintendo", multi-device or multi-flow product design, or redesigning an app's information architecture.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

11 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 8 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 8

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

No licence file, so all rights are reserved — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.