agentleFS
jon-devlapazjon-devlapaz/agentic-se-skills/.agents/skills/decision-analysis/SKILL.md

decision-analysis

Skill7 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub

Use when comparing architecture options, tool choices, trade studies, criteria, scoring, rationale, or decision records for agentic coding.

2 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use this skill when a coding choice has multiple plausible options and the tradeoff should survive review.

    line 8
  2. Very specific:

    Start with references/source-grounding.md, then inspect Section 6.8 pages extraction/pages/page_174.md through extraction/pages/page_180.md …

    line 23

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Decision Analysis

Use this skill when a coding choice has multiple plausible options and the tradeoff should survive review.

Workflow

  1. State the decision needed, decision owner, scope, and deadline.
  2. List viable alternatives, including "do nothing" when realistic.
  3. Define criteria before choosing; include user impact, risk, cost, reversibility, maintainability, and verification burden.
  4. Weight or rank criteria when tradeoffs are not obvious.
  5. Compare alternatives against the same criteria using evidence, assumptions, and uncertainties.
  6. Select an option only after the matrix is visible.
  7. Record rationale, dissent or weak evidence, follow-up verification, and a revisit trigger.
  8. Output a decision record: decision, alternatives, criteria, evidence matrix, selected option, rationale, risks, verification burden, revisit trigger.

Source grounding

Start with references/source-grounding.md, then inspect Section 6.8 pages extraction/pages/page_174.md through extraction/pages/page_180.md before making NASA-handbook-derived decision-analysis claims.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.