mysql-migration
Skill30 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
MySQL schema migration safety reviewer and DDL generator. ALWAYS use when writing, reviewing, or planning MySQL schema changes — ALTER TABLE, CREATE/DROP INDEX, column type changes, charset conversions, data backfills, or any DDL touching production tables. Covers online DDL algorithm selection (INSTANT/INPLACE/COPY), lock-safety analysis, large-table migration with gh-ost/pt-osc, phased rollout design, replication-safe DDL, backward compatibility, and rollback planning. Use even for "simple" ADD COLUMN — MySQL DDL locking behavior is version- and operation-dependent, and mistakes cause production outages.
- Deletes or force-pushes
In this repository52 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- api-designSkill
- api-integration-testSkill
- constructive-thinkingSkill
- create-prSkill
- deep-researchSkill
- e2e-testSkill
- fuzzing-testSkill
- git-commitSkill
- go-benchmarkSkill
- go-ci-workflowSkill
- go-code-reviewerSkill
- go-concurrency-reviewSkill
- go-dependency-auditSkill
- go-error-reviewSkill
- go-logic-reviewSkill
- go-makefile-writerSkill
- go-observability-reviewSkill
- google-searchSkill
- go-performance-reviewSkill
- go-quality-reviewSkill
- go-review-leadSkill
- go-security-reviewSkill
- go-test-reviewSkill
- incident-postmortemSkill
- kafka-event-driven-designSkill
- load-testSkill
- local-transcriptSkill
- log-analyzerSkill
- mongo-migrationSkill
- monitoring-alertingSkill
- oceanbase-table-designSkill
- oracle-migrationSkill
- pg-migrationSkill
- readme-generatorSkill
- redis-cache-strategySkill
- security-reviewSkill
- stock-analysis-leadSkill
- stock-balance-sheet-reviewSkill
- stock-business-reviewSkill
- stock-earnings-quality-reviewSkill
- stock-industry-reviewSkill
- stock-management-reviewSkill
- stock-peer-comparison-reviewSkill
- systematic-debuggingSkill
- tdd-workflowSkill
- tech-doc-writerSkill
- thirdparty-api-integration-testSkill
- unit-testSkill
- update-docSkill
- writing-plansSkill
- yt-dlp-downloaderSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. About 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈8
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 133
PROCEED: Every DDL statement has a per-axis score, an overall band, and a corresponding mitigation.
- Distinctive: line 137
Before delivering output, verify all §9 Output Contract sections are present.
- Distinctive: line 149
Force Standard or higher: when any signal appears: column type change, NOT NULL addition, PK modification, FK add/remove, charset change, …
- Distinctive: line 156
When context is incomplete, degrade gracefully — never fabricate information.
- Distinctive: line 165
Hard rule: Never claim "SAFE" without evidence.
- Distinctive: line 253
Phase 1 — Additive schema: add nullable columns, new indexes (online DDL)
- Distinctive: line 256
Phase 4 — Constraints: add NOT NULL, UNIQUE, or FK after backfill verified
- Distinctive: line 353
Every migration review MUST produce these sections.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
MySQL Migration Safety Review
Quick Reference
| If you need to… | Go to |
| Understand what this skill covers | §1 Scope |
| Check mandatory prerequisites | §2 Mandatory Gates |
| Choose review depth | §3 Depth Selection |
| Handle incomplete context | §4 Degradation Modes |
| Analyze DDL safety item by item | §5 DDL Safety Checklist |
| Design a phased execution plan | §6 Execution Plan |
| Avoid common migration mistakes | §7 Anti-Examples |
| Score the review result | §8 Scorecard |
| Format review output | §9 Output Contract |
| Run the deterministic checker | §11 + scripts/lint_migration.py |
| Look up DDL algorithm by operation | references/ddl-algorithm-matrix.md |
| Plan a large-table (>10M rows) change | references/large-table-migration.md |
§1 Scope
Verified — 5.7, 8.0, 8.4 (transcribed from each manual, 2026-08-06). Assumed — 8.1–8.3, 9.x:
8.4's rules applied but never confirmed there; 9.x shares 8.4's online-DDL matrix byte for byte, yet
9.1.0 raised the INSTANT row-version ceiling 64→255 without touching it, so matrix identity is not
rule identity — re-check numeric thresholds against the target's manual. Unverified — 5.6 and
older, past 9.x: say so in §9.9 rather than answering as if covered. MM028 reports both;
--fail-on warning makes either a hard stop.
In scope — schema migration safety for InnoDB:
- ALTER TABLE (add/drop/modify column, add/drop index, rename, convert charset); CREATE / DROP INDEX
- Data backfill and transformation migrations
- Table restructuring (partitioning, splitting, merging), foreign key changes
- Migration files as SQL: raw
.sql/.ddl, Flyway, golang-migrate. Liquibase only via its SQL changelogs orliquibase updateSQLoutput — XML/YAML/JSON changelogs and programmatic (Go/Java/Python) migrations are not parsed; review the generated SQL and say that is what you did - Rollback planning, verification, and replication impact assessment
Out of scope — delegate to dedicated skills:
- Query optimization, connection pooling, buffer tuning →
mysql-best-practise - Application code changes →
go-code-revieweror language-specific reviewer - Security hardening, privilege management →
security-review
§2 Mandatory Gates
Execute gates sequentially. Each gate has a STOP condition — if triggered, do not proceed until resolved.
Gate 1: Context Collection
Collect before giving migration advice:
| Item | Why it matters | If unknown |
Exact MySQL version (8.0.28, not "8.x") | INSTANT gates land at 8.0.12 / 8.0.28 / 8.0.29; replication statements change at 8.0.22 and 8.4. A major version is not enough, and versions outside 5.7 / 8.0 / 8.4 / 9.x are unverified (§1) | Assume 5.7 (most restrictive) |
| Storage engine | Only InnoDB supports online DDL | Assume InnoDB; WARN if MyISAM |
| Table row count | Determines safe DDL vs tool-based threshold | Ask, or estimate via SHOW TABLE STATUS |
| Table data + index size | Large tables need gh-ost / pt-osc | Ask, or estimate |
| Active QPS on table | High-traffic amplifies MDL contention | Assume high-traffic (conservative) |
| Replication topology | DDL on source replicates; COPY causes lag | Assume source-replica with GTID |
| Maintenance window | Some operations need low-traffic periods | Assume none (zero-downtime required) |
| Migration framework | Flyway/Liquibase/golang-migrate affect rollback | Detect from project files |
| gh-ost / pt-osc version (only when recommending one) | --include-triggers needs gh-ost ≥1.1.8; --resume/--revert ≥1.1.9; --attempt-instant-ddl ≥1.1.6 | Assume no trigger support; recommend pt-osc if the table has triggers |
If database access is available, run:
SELECT VERSION();
SHOW TABLE STATUS WHERE Name = '<table>' \G
SHOW CREATE TABLE <table> \GSTOP: Cannot determine whether the target is MySQL at all (e.g., migration file has no MySQL-identifiable syntax). Redirect to appropriate skill.
PROCEED: At least MySQL version and table name are known or conservatively assumed. Record all assumptions.
Gate 2: Scope Classification
Classify the request mode:
| Mode | Trigger | Output |
| review | User provides existing migration SQL/file | Safety analysis of provided DDL |
| generate | User describes desired schema change | Migration SQL + safety analysis |
| plan | User describes goal without specifics | Phased migration plan + rationale |
STOP: Request is not migration-related (e.g., query optimization, tuning). Redirect to mysql-best-practise.
PROCEED: Migration intent confirmed. Continue with depth selection.
Gate 3: Risk Classification
Risk is blast radius × duration × reversibility, not row count alone: a 1M-row table at 20k QPS is more dangerous than a 50M-row archive nobody writes to. Score each DDL statement across five axes and take the highest band any axis reaches.
| Axis | SAFE | WARN | UNSAFE |
| A. Concurrency — does the server permit concurrent DML? | INSTANT, or INPLACE + LOCK=NONE | INPLACE + LOCK=SHARED (writes block) | COPY / LOCK=EXCLUSIVE, or the algorithm is unknown |
| B. Work volume — does it rewrite the table? | Metadata only, no rebuild | Rebuild under ~1M rows / ~1GB | Rebuild above ~10M rows or ~10GB |
| C. Write pressure — QPS on the table during the window | Low traffic, or a maintenance window exists | Moderate, off-peak reachable | High-traffic with no window; MDL queue would cascade |
| D. Replication — cost on the replica | Metadata event only | Rebuild the replicas can absorb inside the lag SLA | Rebuild exceeding the lag SLA, or 5.7 single-threaded applier on a large table |
| E. Reversibility — see §5.3 | Reversible by a cheap compensating DDL | Reversible with a rebuild, or with bounded data loss | Irreversible without restore (DROP COLUMN/TABLE, narrowing type, destructive backfill) |
Row count enters via axis B only, as a proxy for rebuild duration — prefer table size in bytes or a timed run on a replica. Any axis UNSAFE → UNSAFE (no averaging); two axes WARN → UNSAFE unless you name the one you mitigated; axis C or D unknown counts as WARN, not SAFE — an unmeasured hot table is not a cold one.
| Band | Required action |
| SAFE | Session guards sufficient |
| WARN | Off-peak window + live monitoring + a stated abort trigger |
| UNSAFE | gh-ost/pt-osc or a phased plan + staged rollout + reversal path rehearsed on a replica |
STOP: Any UNSAFE item has no mitigation plan. Must provide tool-based alternative or phased approach before proceeding.
PROCEED: Every DDL statement has a per-axis score, an overall band, and a corresponding mitigation.
Gate 4: Output Completeness
Before delivering output, verify all §9 Output Contract sections are present. If any section is missing, add it (even if "N/A — [reason]"). §9.9 Uncovered Risks must never be empty.
§3 Depth Selection
| Depth | When to use | Gates | References to load |
| Lite | ≤3 DDL statements, all additive (ADD nullable column, CREATE INDEX) | 1–4 | None |
| Standard | 4–15 statements, or any destructive/modifying DDL | 1–4 | ddl-algorithm-matrix.md |
| Deep | >15 statements, or table >10M rows, or multi-step data migration | 1–4 | Both reference files |
Force Standard or higher when any signal appears: column type change, NOT NULL addition, PK modification, FK add/remove, charset change, data backfill, partition change, column rename/removal.
§4 Degradation Modes
When context is incomplete, degrade gracefully — never fabricate information.
| Available context | Mode | What you can do | What you cannot do |
| Full (version, size, QPS, replicas) | Full | All checklist items, precise recommendations | — |
| Version + size known, others unknown | Degraded | Full checklist with conservative assumptions | Precise lock-time estimates |
| Only migration SQL, no context | Minimal | Static DDL analysis, flag all unknowns | Algorithm version-match, replication assessment |
| No SQL (planning request) | Planning | Generate migration plan from requirements | Review existing SQL |
Hard rule: Never claim "SAFE" without evidence. In Degraded/Minimal mode, mark items as "SAFE (assumed — verify against production)" and list all assumptions in §9.9 Uncovered Risks.
§5 DDL Safety Checklist
Execute every item for each DDL statement. Mark SAFE / WARN / UNSAFE with evidence.
5.1 Algorithm & Lock Assessment
Algorithm selection — determine
ALGORITHM=INSTANT,ALGORITHM=INPLACE, orALGORITHM=COPYfor each ALTER TABLE against the exact server version, then state it explicitly. Never rely on server default. Loadreferences/ddl-algorithm-matrix.mdwhenever the operation is not a plainADD COLUMNorADD INDEX.Gates that are wrong more often than not — the
ALGORITHM=INSTANTclause itself does not exist before 8.0.12, so 5.7 and 8.0.0–8.0.11 reject it for every operation,SET DEFAULTincluded; within 8.0.12+, positionalADD COLUMNneeds 8.0.29+,RENAME COLUMN8.0.28+,DROP COLUMN8.0.29+;DROP COLUMNis INPLACE+LOCK=NONEon 5.7 and pre-8.0.29, never COPY; extendingVARCHARis never INSTANT and is COPY across the 255/256-byte boundary;ADD FOREIGN KEYis INPLACE only whileforeign_key_checks=0, else COPY. Exception — partition clauses:ADD/DROP/REORGANIZE/COALESCE/REBUILD PARTITIONaccept onlyALGORITHM=DEFAULT, LOCK=DEFAULTon 5.7, where namingINPLACEmakes the statement fail. Use matrix §4 for those.Lock level — the rule below applies to INPLACE and COPY only. With
ALGORITHM=INSTANT, omit theLOCKclause or writeLOCK=DEFAULT;NONE,SHAREDandEXCLUSIVEare rejected — "OnlyLOCK = DEFAULTis permitted for operations that useALGORITHM=INSTANT."ALGORITHM=INSTANT, LOCK=NONEis a failed statement, not a stronger guarantee.For INPLACE/COPY: specify
LOCK=NONEwhen the matrix says concurrent DML is permitted. Where it is not (ADD FULLTEXT/SPATIAL INDEX,CONVERT TO CHARACTER SET,DROP PRIMARY KEYalone, adding anAUTO_INCREMENTcolumn, and 8.0REORGANIZE/COALESCE/REBUILD PARTITION), the best available isLOCK=SHARED— state it explicitly and budget the write outage, or escalate to gh-ost/pt-osc. Omitting the clause turns a planned decision into an unplanned one. Note thatINPLACE, LOCK=NONEstill rebuilds the table forADD PRIMARY KEY,MODIFY … NULL/NOT NULL, andROW_FORMATchanges: online is not free — budget the I/O, ~2× disk, and axis-D lag.- MDL contention — including INSTANT — all three algorithms can take an exclusive metadata lock. ALTER TABLE reference: "INSTANT: … An exclusive metadata lock on the table may be taken briefly during the execution phase of the operation." A long-running transaction holds it, the DDL queues, every later query queues behind the DDL — the usual cause of a "safe" change taking a site down, and INSTANT is not exempt. Guard every DDL, INSTANT included, with
SET SESSION lock_wait_timeout = 3;before the statement, and pre-checkSELECT * FROM information_schema.innodb_trx WHERE trx_started < NOW() - INTERVAL 30 SECOND;. (The What Is New page's "no metadata locks are taken" is a looser summary than the reference; not licence to skip the guard.) - Replication impact — MySQL 5.7 replicas apply DDL single-threaded; COPY causes severe lag. Will DDL duration exceed the replica lag SLA?
5.2 Data Integrity
- NOT NULL + DEFAULT safety — adding NOT NULL to column with existing NULLs → ALTER fails. Use phased approach.
- Type change truncation — narrowing VARCHAR, reducing DECIMAL precision → silent data loss. Widening may change algorithm.
- FK cascade and algorithm risk —
ON DELETE CASCADEon a large parent → uncontrolled write amplification. AndADD FOREIGN KEYis COPY unlessforeign_key_checks=0: with checks on the server validates every child row and rebuilds the table; with checks off you get INPLACE but an unvalidated constraint. There is no online-and-validated option — seereferences/migration-anti-examples.mdAE-13. - Index write amplification — each new index costs every INSERT/UPDATE. Check for redundant indexes (prefix of existing composite).
5.3 Backward Compatibility
- Deployment ordering — column add → schema first, then app; column remove → app first, then schema; column rename → two-phase with dual-write.
Reversal path — MySQL DDL cannot be rolled back. Every DDL issues an implicit
COMMITbefore and after itself, soROLLBACKafter a completedALTERdoes nothing. 8.0's atomic DDL is crash-safety for the dictionary + storage change, not user-visible undo."Rollback" therefore means one of five concrete things. Name which one applies per phase:
Path Applies to Abort before cut-over gh-ost/pt-osc runs and phased plans not yet at the switch — free Compensating DDL Additive changes: drop the column or index you added Application revert Anything behind dual-write or a feature flag; schema stays Roll forward Bad backfill or wrong default — fix with another migration Restore / PITR Irreversible loss: DROP COLUMN/TABLE, narrowed type, destructiveUPDATEClassify each phase reversible (compensating DDL or app revert), reversible-with-loss (roll forward; rows written to the dropped structure are gone), or irreversible (restore only). Never emit a
rollback:block that cannot restore state — anADD COLUMNoffered as the rollback for aDROP COLUMNrecreates an empty column and reads as if recovery happened.
5.4 Operational Safety
- Session guards — every migration session MUST set
lock_wait_timeoutandinnodb_lock_wait_timeoutbefore DDL. - Disk space — COPY needs ~2× table size. gh-ost needs ghost table + binlog backlog.
- Idempotency — can the migration re-run after partial failure? MySQL
ALTER TABLEhas noIF NOT EXISTS/IF EXISTSfor columns or indexes (that is MariaDB); writing it is a parse error. OnlyCREATE TABLE/DROP TABLE/CREATE DATABASE/DROP DATABASEaccept it. Achieve idempotency by: the framework's history table (Flywayflyway_schema_history, golang-migrateschema_migrations); a pre-flightinformation_schema.COLUMNS/STATISTICSprobe that decides whether to emit the DDL; one DDL per file so a partial failure has an unambiguous resume point; and a recorded checkpoint for batched backfills. - Statement granularity — one DDL per migration file, so a failure leaves an unambiguous state and the compensating DDL is obvious (there is no transactional rollback — see item 10). Exception: independent
ADD COLUMNs should be grouped, which also costs one INSTANT row version instead of several.
§6 Execution Plan (Standard + Deep)
For non-trivial migrations, decompose into the standard phased pattern:
- Phase 1 — Additive schema: add nullable columns, new indexes (online DDL)
- Phase 2 — Backfill: populate from existing data in PK-ordered batches (see
references/large-table-migration.md§4) - Phase 3 — App deploy: deploy code writing to both old and new schema
- Phase 4 — Constraints: add NOT NULL, UNIQUE, or FK after backfill verified
- Phase 5 — Cleanup (separate release): drop old columns, remove dual-write
Each phase requires: Pre-condition → SQL (with session guards) → Validation → Rollback → Go/No-go criteria.
For tables >10M rows requiring COPY, use gh-ost (default) or pt-osc (if inbound FKs). Details in references/large-table-migration.md.
§7 Anti-Examples
AE-1: Implicit algorithm — trusting server default
-- WRONG: server may silently choose COPY → outage on large table
ALTER TABLE users ADD COLUMN age INT;
-- RIGHT on 8.0.12+:
ALTER TABLE users ADD COLUMN age INT DEFAULT NULL, ALGORITHM=INSTANT;
-- RIGHT on 5.7 (INSTANT does not exist there; the line above would error out):
ALTER TABLE users ADD COLUMN age INT DEFAULT NULL, ALGORITHM=INPLACE, LOCK=NONE;Explicit only helps when it is also correct for the version.
AE-2: NOT NULL on populated column without phased approach
-- WRONG: fails if any row has NULL
ALTER TABLE orders ADD COLUMN status VARCHAR(20) NOT NULL;
-- RIGHT: add nullable → backfill → enforce NOT NULL (see §6)AE-3: DDL without session guards
-- WRONG: blocks indefinitely if long transaction holds MDL
ALTER TABLE large_table ADD INDEX idx_date (created_at);
-- RIGHT:
SET SESSION lock_wait_timeout = 3;
ALTER TABLE large_table ADD INDEX idx_date (created_at), ALGORITHM=INPLACE, LOCK=NONE;AE-4: DROP COLUMN without data backup
-- WRONG: data gone forever
ALTER TABLE users DROP COLUMN legacy_field;
-- RIGHT: backup → wait one release cycle → dropAE-5: Native COPY on 100M-row table
-- WRONG: hours of exclusive lock
ALTER TABLE events MODIFY COLUMN payload MEDIUMTEXT;
-- RIGHT: use gh-ost (see references/large-table-migration.md)AE-6: Style nitpick reported as migration risk
-- WRONG: "WARN — column name 'usr_nm' violates naming convention"
-- RIGHT: only flag naming if it causes functional problemsAE-7 through AE-17 in references/migration-anti-examples.md: partition-clause algorithm rejection (AE-14), VARCHAR/INSTANT (AE-15), gh-ost mode confusion (AE-16), INSTANT row-version exhaustion (AE-17).
§8 Migration Scorecard
Critical — any FAIL means overall FAIL
- Algorithm explicitly specified for every ALTER TABLE (
ALGORITHM=INSTANT|INPLACE|COPY), or the statement is a partition clause where the matrix says onlyDEFAULTis accepted - Session guards set before every DDL (
lock_wait_timeout,innodb_lock_wait_timeout) - Every phase names its reversal path from the §5.3-10 table (abort / compensating DDL / app revert / roll forward / restore), with SQL where SQL can actually restore state and an explicit backup + retention plan where it cannot
Standard — 4 of 5 must pass
- DDL algorithm and lock verified against the exact server version, not the major version (INSTANT gates at 8.0.12/8.0.28/8.0.29; no INSTANT on 5.7; partition clauses per matrix §4)
- Replication impact assessed for each COPY/INPLACE operation
- Backward-compatible deployment order (additive before app, removal after app)
- Backfill uses PK-range batching, not LIMIT/OFFSET
- Validation SQL provided for each phase
Hygiene — 3 of 4 must pass
- Disk space impact estimated for COPY/gh-ost operations
- Re-runnable after partial failure — via the framework's history table or an
information_schemapre-check, notIF [NOT] EXISTS, whichALTER TABLErejects - Post-deploy monitoring checks specified (replication lag, error rate)
- One DDL per migration file (or grouped ADD COLUMN justified)
Verdict: X/12; Critical: Y/3; Standard: Z/5; Hygiene: W/4.
PASS requires: Critical 3/3 AND Standard ≥4/5 AND Hygiene ≥3/4.
§9 Output Contract
Every migration review MUST produce these sections. Omit none — write "N/A — [reason]" if inapplicable.
### 9.1 Context Gate
| Item | Value | Source |
| MySQL Version | 8.0.32 | SELECT VERSION() |
| ... | ... | ... |
### 9.2 Depth & Mode
[Lite/Standard/Deep] × [review/generate/plan] — [rationale]
### 9.3 Risk Assessment Table
| # | DDL Statement | Algorithm | Lock | Risk | Notes |
### 9.4 Execution Plan (Standard/Deep; "N/A — Lite" for Lite)
### 9.5 Migration SQL (with session guards, explicit algorithms)
### 9.6 Validation SQL
### 9.7 Rollback Plan (per-phase)
### 9.8 Post-Deploy Checks
### 9.9 Uncovered Risks (MANDATORY — never empty)
| Area | Reason | Impact | Follow-up |Volume rules:
- UNSAFE: always fully detailed with mitigation
- WARN: up to 10; overflow to §9.9
- SAFE: summary row only
- §9.9 minimum: document all conservative assumptions made
Scorecard summary (append after §9.9):
Scorecard: X/12 — Critical Y/3, Standard Z/5, Hygiene W/4 — PASS/FAIL
Data basis: [full context | degraded | minimal | planning]§10 Reference Loading Guide
| Condition | Load |
| Standard or Deep depth | references/ddl-algorithm-matrix.md |
| Deep depth, or table >10M rows | references/large-table-migration.md |
| Extended anti-example matching | references/migration-anti-examples.md |
§11 Deterministic Checker
scripts/lint_migration.py decides version-gated algorithm/lock questions mechanically. Run it on the migration under review, then reason about what it cannot see.
python3 scripts/lint_migration.py --mysql-version 8.0.29 path/to/migration.sql # or a dir
python3 scripts/lint_migration.py --list-checks # add --format json for machine output29 checks: INSTANT version gates and its LOCK=DEFAULT-only rule (MM029), never-INSTANT operations, partition-clause algorithm support, LOCK=NONE on write-blocking operations, ADD FOREIGN KEY + foreign_key_checks, VARCHAR byte-boundary crossing, IF [NOT] EXISTS on ALTER, stored-program-only loops, sql_log_bin, gh-ost/pt-osc flag misuse, version-correct replication and lock-inspection statements, an unverified target version (MM028), and unread migration carriers (MM030).
Directory mode reads .sql, .ddl, .mysql, .md, .sh, .bash. A file named explicitly is scanned as SQL only if its extension is unknown; a known-unparseable carrier (Liquibase XML/YAML/JSON, Go/Java/Python) becomes an MM030 finding whether named explicitly or found in a directory — naming it does not make it parseable, and scanning it as SQL reports "clean" about DDL masked inside string values. --fail-on warning therefore refuses any input whose DDL nobody read.
Use it as evidence, not as the review. It reads statements, not your database, so it cannot decide whether a MODIFY changes the type or only nullability (compare SHOW CREATE TABLE), the VARCHAR band without both widths, or risk axes B–D. A clean run means "nothing here is rejected outright" — not that the migration is safe.
Three companions, all opt-in: verify_against_server.sh runs representative ALTERs against a real (disposable) server and reports any matrix claim it contradicts; mutation_sweep.py reintroduces each historical defect and requires the suite to catch it; run_model_eval.py grades with-skill vs without-skill responses on a deterministic rubric.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

