human-review
Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Open an HTML or Markdown file in the browser so the user can edit the text directly and leave comments on specific parts, then send all their edits and comments back to you. Use after writing or updating any HTML or Markdown file the user will read — specs, plans, reports, newsletter drafts, landing pages, slide decks.
8 other projects use a version of this, 2 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- facebookresearch/autoform-bottheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- neeldas1209/GTM-Strategy-Enginetheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- yuhua99/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 14, 2026
- Plexito-de/honed-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 11, 2026
- victorrentea/human-reviewtheir own version, first seen Sep 30, 2026
- petergyang/human-reviewedited, first seen Aug 3, 2026
Other versions8 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 2
- petergyang/human-review★ 1.3k28% same
- arkan/skills★ 164% same
Wrote their own version · 6
- facebookresearch/autoform-bot★ 136same name
- victorrentea/human-review★ 43same name
- IrtezaAsadRizvi/claude-human-review★ 15same name
- Plexito-de/honed-skills★ 3same name
- yuhua99/skills★ 2same name
- neeldas1209/GTM-Strategy-Engine★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository5 other files it gives its agents.
- explain-diff-htmlSkill
- learning-commitSkill
- learning-sessionSkill
- prd-formatSkill
- writing-that-worksSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 8 edited versions we read keep these.
4
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 17
Write or update the HTML or Markdown file.
- Distinctive: line 24
Wait for feedback. This blocks until they hit Send, or the timeout passes:
- Distinctive: line 30
Keep this command in the foreground.
- Very specific: line 31
If your shell returns a process or session handle, keep waiting on that handle until the command exits.
- Distinctive: line 44
Not sure whether feedback is already waiting — say, at the start of a new turn?
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 8 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
human-review
The user reviews your HTML or Markdown in a real browser: they fix small things by typing, select anything to comment on it, and send you the whole batch at once.
Markdown files open rendered. Their quotes and edits reference the rendered text, and the file itself is never touched — apply every change to the Markdown source, keeping its formatting syntax.
The loop
- Write or update the HTML or Markdown file.
Open it for the user:
human-review path/to/file.htmlWait for feedback. This blocks until they hit Send, or the timeout passes:
human-review poll path/to/file.html --timeout 600Keep this command in the foreground. Do not end your turn while it is waiting. If your shell returns a process or session handle, keep waiting on that handle until the command exits. If it prints
{"status":"timeout"}, no feedback has arrived yet — run the same poll command again to keep waiting. Feedback is saved even if a poll dies, so nothing is ever lost.Apply what comes back, then wait again.
--ackclears the batch you just handled:human-review poll path/to/file.html --ack --timeout 600
Repeat 3–4 until the user says they are done.
Not sure whether feedback is already waiting — say, at the start of a new turn? This answers instantly without blocking:
human-review status path/to/file.htmlIt prints {"status": "feedback-waiting"} when a batch is ready for a poll,
plus counts of unsent comments and edits still in the browser.
What you get
One batch covers every page the user visited, grouped by file.
{
"status": "feedback",
"pages": [
{
"file": "/abs/path/to/page.html",
"comments": [
{ "id": "c_1", "kind": "selection", "quote": "the exact text they selected",
"anchor": { "prefix": "...", "quote": "...", "suffix": "..." },
"feedback": "what they want changed" }
],
"edits": [
{ "label": "Problem body", "kind": "edited",
"before": "the original wording",
"after": "their exact new wording" }
]
}
],
"overall_note": "feedback not tied to any one page"
}Rules
editsare changes the user already made.afteris their exact wording — carry it across verbatim and never revert it. If the HTML was generated from something else (MDX, Markdown, a template), applyafterto the source too, or their fix disappears on the next build.- Find each comment by its
quote; that exact string is in the file. kind: "element"points at a whole block, soquoteis its label, not body text.- Fix every page in
pages, not just the first. - Do not write a reply. There is no chat. The user sees your work when the page reloads, which happens on its own the moment you save the file.
Better edit labels (optional)
Name the sections you author and the user's edit list uses your names instead of guessing from the DOM:
<p data-block="Problem body">…</p>
<div data-container="Metrics callout">…</div>data-block names a region for the edit list. data-container also makes the block
clickable as a comment target.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

