agentleFS
jmrplensjmrplens/gitlab-mcp-server/.github/skills/git-commit/SKILL.md

git-commit

Skill47 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub

Execute git commit with conventional commit message analysis, intelligent staging, and message generation. Use when user asks to commit changes, create a git commit, or mentions "/commit". Supports: (1) Auto-detecting type and scope from changes, (2) Generating conventional commit messages from diff, (3) Interactive commit with optional type/scope/description overrides, (4) Intelligent file staging for logical grouping

  • Reads credentials

174 other projects use a version of this, 33 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use git-pr, github-pr-create and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • klauswgSkill

    git-pr

    Prepare, review, publish, or update a complete GitHub pull request for the current repository, including local commit readiness, safe push strategy, semantic title validation, repository-native PR templates, issue linking, and checks verification. Use when the user asks to draft, create, submit, publish, open, or update a pull request. Always require the user to review and explicitly approve the exact final PR before any push or GitHub write.

    Also in 11 projects that use this

  • mjun0812Skill

    github-pr-create

    Pull Requestを作成するSkill。現在のbranchからpull requestを作成する。言語指定可能。 ユーザーが「PR作って」「pull request作成して」のように依頼したら使うこと。

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • MicrosoftSkill

    git-branch

    Branch management for implementation. Use when you need to create a branch, switch branches, checkout, or verify branching strategy before implementing code. Do not use for commits (use git-commit), pull requests (use pull-request), or advanced git operations (rebase, merge).

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • klauswgSkill

    git-issue

    Prepare, review, create, or update evidence-based GitHub issues for the current repository with duplicate detection, repository-native templates, valid labels, and post-publication verification. Use when the user asks to draft, file, submit, publish, edit, or refine a GitHub issue, bug report, feature request, performance issue, or technical proposal. Always require the user to review and explicitly approve the exact final issue before any GitHub write.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • gologo13Skill

    git-push

    Push current branch to origin and sync with remote updates; keywords: git, rebase. Use only on explicit request; before execution, review diffs and list impact scope.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • GoogleSkill

    github-pr-review

    Review a GitHub pull request and leave inline comments in a natural human reviewing voice, indistinguishable from comments typed by hand on the GitHub web UI. Deliberately bounded to defects a reader can settle by looking at the anchored line, rather than a deep audit, so every comment is cheap for the author to check. Scales to 2-20 comments by PR size, parallelises analysis across sub-agents, drafts for approval, then posts individually with human pacing. Use when the user says "review this PR", "review PR 123", pastes a github.com/.../pull/N link, or asks for comments on a pull request. Don't use for reviewing local uncommitted changes or a diff against a branch (use the `review` skill for that).

    Also in 4 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

8 rules. 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 134 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 8

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  • could be automatic: a setting could enforce it
  1. Distinctive:

    Create standardized, semantic git commits using the Conventional Commits specification.

    line 12
  2. Distinctive:

    If nothing is staged or you want to group changes differently:

    line 69
  3. Distinctive:

    Keep description under 72 characters

    line 116
  4. Distinctive:

    NEVER update git config

    line 121
  5. Distinctive:

    NEVER run destructive commands (--force, hard reset) without explicit request

    line 122
  6. Distinctive:

    NEVER skip hooks (--no-verify) unless user asks

    line 123
  7. Distinctive:

    NEVER force push to main/master

    line 124
  8. Distinctive:

    If commit fails due to hooks, fix and create NEW commit (don't amend)

    line 125

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 134 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Git Commit with Conventional Commits

Overview

Create standardized, semantic git commits using the Conventional Commits specification. Analyze the actual diff to determine appropriate type, scope, and message.

Conventional Commit Format

<type>[optional scope]: <description>

[optional body]

[optional footer(s)]

Commit Types

TypePurpose
featNew feature
fixBug fix
docsDocumentation only
styleFormatting/style (no logic)
refactorCode refactor (no feature/fix)
perfPerformance improvement
testAdd/update tests
buildBuild system/dependencies
ciCI/config changes
choreMaintenance/misc
revertRevert commit

Breaking Changes

# Exclamation mark after type/scope
feat!: remove deprecated endpoint

# BREAKING CHANGE footer
feat: allow config to extend other configs

BREAKING CHANGE: `extends` key behavior changed

Workflow

1. Analyze Diff

# If files are staged, use staged diff
git diff --staged

# If nothing staged, use working tree diff
git diff

# Also check status
git status --porcelain

2. Stage Files (if needed)

If nothing is staged or you want to group changes differently:

# Stage specific files
git add path/to/file1 path/to/file2

# Stage by pattern
git add *.test.*
git add src/components/*

# Interactive staging
git add -p

Never commit secrets (.env, credentials.json, private keys).

3. Generate Commit Message

Analyze the diff to determine:

  • Type: What kind of change is this?
  • Scope: What area/module is affected?
  • Description: One-line summary of what changed (present tense, imperative mood, <72 chars)

4. Execute Commit

# Single line
git commit -s -m "<type>[scope]: <description>"

# Multi-line with body/footer
git commit -s -m "$(cat <<'EOF'
<type>[scope]: <description>

<optional body>

<optional footer>
EOF
)"

Best Practices

  • One logical change per commit
  • Present tense: "add" not "added"
  • Imperative mood: "fix bug" not "fixes bug"
  • Reference issues: Closes #123, Refs #456
  • Keep description under 72 characters
  • Sign off every commit (-s), which certifies the Developer Certificate of Origin for it; CI's dco job fails a pull request with a commit that lacks the sign-off, and make check-dco lists any before a push. A sign-off is the author's, not AI attribution

Git Safety Protocol

  • NEVER update git config
  • NEVER run destructive commands (--force, hard reset) without explicit request
  • NEVER skip hooks (--no-verify) unless user asks
  • NEVER force push to main/master
  • If commit fails due to hooks, fix and create NEW commit (don't amend)
  • NEVER add AI attribution: no Co-Authored-By: trailer naming an assistant or tool, no "Generated with ..." footer, no session or transcript link. The message is about the change, not about how it was produced (project policy in CLAUDE.md; a squash merge turns the PR body into the commit message, so strip such footers there too)

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.