git-commit
Skill47 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
Execute git commit with conventional commit message analysis, intelligent staging, and message generation. Use when user asks to commit changes, create a git commit, or mentions "/commit". Supports: (1) Auto-detecting type and scope from changes, (2) Generating conventional commit messages from diff, (3) Interactive commit with optional type/scope/description overrides, (4) Intelligent file staging for logical grouping
- Reads credentials
174 other projects use a version of this, 33 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- HAOYI99/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- swjybky/deepwritetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- PC2005-cloud/dsh-pettheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- stuff4ai/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- apattichis/agentic-research-toolkittheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Darna-Digital/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use git-pr, github-pr-create and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
klauswgSkillgit-pr
Prepare, review, publish, or update a complete GitHub pull request for the current repository, including local commit readiness, safe push strategy, semantic title validation, repository-native PR templates, issue linking, and checks verification. Use when the user asks to draft, create, submit, publish, open, or update a pull request. Always require the user to review and explicitly approve the exact final PR before any push or GitHub write.
Also in 11 projects that use this
mjun0812Skillgithub-pr-create
Pull Requestを作成するSkill。現在のbranchからpull requestを作成する。言語指定可能。 ユーザーが「PR作って」「pull request作成して」のように依頼したら使うこと。
Also in 3 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillgit-branch
Branch management for implementation. Use when you need to create a branch, switch branches, checkout, or verify branching strategy before implementing code. Do not use for commits (use git-commit), pull requests (use pull-request), or advanced git operations (rebase, merge).
Also in 4 projects that use this
klauswgSkillgit-issue
Prepare, review, create, or update evidence-based GitHub issues for the current repository with duplicate detection, repository-native templates, valid labels, and post-publication verification. Use when the user asks to draft, file, submit, publish, edit, or refine a GitHub issue, bug report, feature request, performance issue, or technical proposal. Always require the user to review and explicitly approve the exact final issue before any GitHub write.
Also in 3 projects that use this
gologo13Skillgit-push
Push current branch to origin and sync with remote updates; keywords: git, rebase. Use only on explicit request; before execution, review diffs and list impact scope.
Also in 6 projects that use this
GoogleSkillgithub-pr-review
Review a GitHub pull request and leave inline comments in a natural human reviewing voice, indistinguishable from comments typed by hand on the GitHub web UI. Deliberately bounded to defects a reader can settle by looking at the anchored line, rather than a deep audit, so every comment is cheap for the author to check. Scales to 2-20 comments by PR size, parallelises analysis across sub-agents, drafts for approval, then posts individually with human pacing. Use when the user says "review this PR", "review PR 123", pastes a github.com/.../pull/N link, or asks for comments on a pull request. Don't use for reviewing local uncommitted changes or a diff against a branch (use the `review` skill for that).
Also in 4 projects that use this
Other versions174 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 33
- doocs/leetcode★ 37k93% same
- doocs/md★ 14k44% same
- GitTools/GitVersion★ 3.1k90% same
- lnikell/loopndroll★ 56795% same
- diodeme/Gold-Band★ 16489% same
- getlago/lago-front★ 16395% same
- jaskirat1616/grok-skills★ 2287% same
- louisbrulenaudet/monorepo-template★ 1995% same
- klauswg/sasuke★ 1795% same
- isak102/neowright★ 1495% same
23 more not listed
Wrote their own version · 141
- github/awesome-copilot★ 41ksame name
- tisfeng/Easydict★ 15ksame name
- spinabot/brigade★ 11ksame name
- PC2005-cloud/dsh-pet★ 5.9ksame name
- igorescodro/alkaa★ 1.6ksame name
- microsoft/hve-core★ 1.6ksame name
- mattmireles/gemma-tuner-multimodal★ 1.5ksame name
- rohaquinlop/complexipy★ 909same name
- decebals/claude-code-java★ 763same name
- swjybky/deepwrite★ 722same name
131 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository22 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- llms-full.txtllms.txt
- llms.txtllms.txt
- create-architectural-decision-recordSkill
- create-implementation-planSkill
- create-mcp-evaluationSkill
- create-mcp-toolSkill
- create-specificationSkill
- generate-project-documentationSkill
- generate-release-notesSkill
- golang-patternsSkill
- golang-testingSkill
- go-safe-move-refactorSkill
- go-source-documentationSkill
- increase-test-coverageSkill
- modularize-go-packageSkill
- review-and-refactorSkill
- update-project-documentationSkill
- update-starlight-docsSkill
- upstream-contributionSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 134 edited versions we read keep these.
8
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- could be automatic: a setting could enforce it
- Distinctive: line 12
Create standardized, semantic git commits using the Conventional Commits specification.
- Distinctive: line 69
If nothing is staged or you want to group changes differently:
- Distinctive: line 116
Keep description under 72 characters
- Distinctive: line 121
NEVER update git config
- Distinctive: line 122
NEVER run destructive commands (--force, hard reset) without explicit request
- Distinctive: line 123
NEVER skip hooks (--no-verify) unless user asks
- Distinctive: line 124
NEVER force push to main/master
- Distinctive: line 125
If commit fails due to hooks, fix and create NEW commit (don't amend)
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 134 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Git Commit with Conventional Commits
Overview
Create standardized, semantic git commits using the Conventional Commits specification. Analyze the actual diff to determine appropriate type, scope, and message.
Conventional Commit Format
<type>[optional scope]: <description>
[optional body]
[optional footer(s)]Commit Types
| Type | Purpose |
feat | New feature |
fix | Bug fix |
docs | Documentation only |
style | Formatting/style (no logic) |
refactor | Code refactor (no feature/fix) |
perf | Performance improvement |
test | Add/update tests |
build | Build system/dependencies |
ci | CI/config changes |
chore | Maintenance/misc |
revert | Revert commit |
Breaking Changes
# Exclamation mark after type/scope
feat!: remove deprecated endpoint
# BREAKING CHANGE footer
feat: allow config to extend other configs
BREAKING CHANGE: `extends` key behavior changedWorkflow
1. Analyze Diff
# If files are staged, use staged diff
git diff --staged
# If nothing staged, use working tree diff
git diff
# Also check status
git status --porcelain2. Stage Files (if needed)
If nothing is staged or you want to group changes differently:
# Stage specific files
git add path/to/file1 path/to/file2
# Stage by pattern
git add *.test.*
git add src/components/*
# Interactive staging
git add -pNever commit secrets (.env, credentials.json, private keys).
3. Generate Commit Message
Analyze the diff to determine:
- Type: What kind of change is this?
- Scope: What area/module is affected?
- Description: One-line summary of what changed (present tense, imperative mood, <72 chars)
4. Execute Commit
# Single line
git commit -s -m "<type>[scope]: <description>"
# Multi-line with body/footer
git commit -s -m "$(cat <<'EOF'
<type>[scope]: <description>
<optional body>
<optional footer>
EOF
)"Best Practices
- One logical change per commit
- Present tense: "add" not "added"
- Imperative mood: "fix bug" not "fixes bug"
- Reference issues:
Closes #123,Refs #456 - Keep description under 72 characters
- Sign off every commit (
-s), which certifies the Developer Certificate of Origin for it; CI'sdcojob fails a pull request with a commit that lacks the sign-off, andmake check-dcolists any before a push. A sign-off is the author's, not AI attribution
Git Safety Protocol
- NEVER update git config
- NEVER run destructive commands (--force, hard reset) without explicit request
- NEVER skip hooks (--no-verify) unless user asks
- NEVER force push to main/master
- If commit fails due to hooks, fix and create NEW commit (don't amend)
- NEVER add AI attribution: no
Co-Authored-By:trailer naming an assistant or tool, no "Generated with ..." footer, no session or transcript link. The message is about the change, not about how it was produced (project policy inCLAUDE.md; a squash merge turns the PR body into the commit message, so strip such footers there too)
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

