swarm
Skill2 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Fan out N parallel workers, drain them, and return one report. Use for `pstack:swarm`, 'swarm this', or parallel coverage, races, gauntlets, and exploration.
87 other projects use a version of this, 45 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- niksavis/basiclytheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- endqwerty/endstackedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- tristanphvn/keeledited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- hidenobunagai/astackedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Belweave/hstacktheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- blinkboxhq/Blinkboxtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use poteto-help, principle-explain-the-number and 3 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
ianclearySkillpoteto-help
Guides users through pstack setup, /poteto-mode, and picking the skill, playbook, or principle for a task. Type /poteto-help with a question.
Also in 14 projects that use this
ianclearySkillprinciple-explain-the-number
Apply before you trust, report, or act on a number you measured: a speedup, a regression, a throughput, a latency, or an eval result. Find what limits it, and rule out that it measured something other than the work you think.
Also in 27 projects that use this
jaydubya818Skillprinciple-attack-the-premise
Apply when repeated fixes fail and a shared assumption may be wrong.
Also in 31 projects that use this
jaydubya818Skillprinciple-test-behavior-not-implementation
Apply when tests mirror internals instead of asserting observable outcomes.
Also in 31 projects that use this
tristanphvnSkillketchup-video
Catch the user up like /keel:ketchup, with a short silent video of slides for what happened and the waiting calls as text under it. Use for /keel:ketchup-video.
Also in 11 projects that use this
Other versions87 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 45
- backnotprop/pstack★ 3.8k31% same
- moeru-ai/xsai★ 66731% same
- uzairansaruzi/p3-stack★ 12646% same
- dsebban/skills★ 7131% same
- overextended/skills★ 2229% same
- creedants/pstack-t3★ 1822% same
- painhardcore/pstack★ 1838% same
- Scino/fstack★ 1857% same
- mariusflorescu/pstack-t3★ 1326% same
- adjohn/pstack★ 939% same
35 more not listed
Wrote their own version · 42
- langchain-ai/langchain-skills★ 1.3ksame name
- zaxbysauce/opencode-swarm★ 519same name
- ZaxbyHub/opencode-swarm★ 518same name
- guaardvark/guaardvark★ 306same name
- iha2/superlite★ 249same name
- apple-ouyang/book-to-skill★ 148same name
- jtaroreh/agystack★ 128same name
- cj-vana/claude-swarm★ 110same name
- TheOnlyFusionCube/potetos-for-everyone★ 21same name
- jmylchreest/aide★ 19same name
32 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository49 other files it gives its agents.
- architectSkill
- arenaSkill
- automate-meSkill
- blast-radiusSkill
- broSkill
- comment-sickoSkill
- create-verification-skillSkill
- figure-it-outSkill
- howSkill
- interrogateSkill
- maintain-verification-skillSkill
- make-bot-uiSkill
- no-commentsSkill
- poteto-agentSkill
- poteto-modeSkill
- principle-boundary-disciplineSkill
- principle-build-the-leverSkill
- principle-encode-lessons-in-structureSkill
- principle-exhaust-the-design-spaceSkill
- principle-experience-firstSkill
- principle-fix-root-causesSkill
- principle-foundational-thinkingSkill
- principle-guard-the-context-windowSkill
- principle-laziness-protocolSkill
- principle-make-operations-idempotentSkill
- principle-migrate-callers-then-delete-legacy-apisSkill
- principle-minimize-reader-loadSkill
- principle-model-the-domainSkill
- principle-never-block-on-the-humanSkill
- principle-outcome-oriented-executionSkill
- principle-prove-it-worksSkill
- principle-redesign-from-first-principlesSkill
- principle-separate-before-serializing-shared-stateSkill
- principle-sequence-verifiable-unitsSkill
- principle-subtract-before-you-addSkill
- principle-type-system-disciplineSkill
- recallSkill
- reflectSkill
- reproduce-and-fix-issuesSkill
- setup-bennySkill
- setup-pstackSkill
- show-me-your-workSkill
- tddSkill
- teachSkill
- technical-writingSkill
- triage-issue-reportsSkill
- typescript-best-practicesSkill
- unslopSkill
- whySkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 83 edited versions we read keep these.
5
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 24
Use the active Hermes session model and delegation configuration.
- Distinctive: line 31
When a worker must start from a non-default branch, include the branch name in its self-contained goal and verify the checkout before …
- Very specific: line 33
Every brief stands alone. Include the goal, scope, exact slice or race arm, how to verify, and what to report.
- Distinctive: line 35
If a worker drops out, proceed with N-1 and note it.
- Distinctive: line 39
Read the terminal results.
- Distinctive: line 41
Keep a compact result table, one-line evidenced issues, and explicit gaps or dropouts.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 83 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Swarm
Fan out N parallel cloud workers. They may cover separate slices, race the same brief, or mix both. The parent waits, aggregates, and returns one report.
Start
Open a todolist with one entry per phase before launching anything.
- Frame
- Fan out
- Aggregate
- Report
Phase A: Frame
- State the done predicate and the artifact or report the swarm must return.
- Choose the shape. Partition into slices, race N workers on identical briefs, or mix both. For a race or mixed shape, declare
first pass,rank all, orbest-ofbefore spawning. - Set N from the user or derive it from the shape. N is total workers, not the cloud concurrency limit.
- Use the active Hermes session model and delegation configuration. Do not invent a per-worker model parameter. For comparisons, state the intended comparison explicitly and run separate Hermes processes only when distinct models are genuinely required.
- Give each worker its own writable output when it writes. Use a worktree, branch, or
/tmp/swarm-<slug>/worker-<n>/.
Phase B: Fan out
Spawn all N workers with delegate_task in one assistant turn when independent. Each brief stands alone. Include the goal, scope, exact slice or race arm, verification command, and report format.
When a worker must start from a non-default branch, include the branch name in its self-contained goal and verify the checkout before editing.
Every brief stands alone. Include the goal, scope, exact slice or race arm, how to verify, and what to report. Reports use PASS, ISSUES, or BLOCKED with evidence.
If a worker drops out, proceed with N-1 and note it.
Phase C: Aggregate
Read the terminal results. For coverage, every required slice needs a result. For a race, apply the selection rule declared up front. Use first pass, rank all, or best-of. Do not paste raw worker dumps.
Keep a compact result table, one-line evidenced issues, and explicit gaps or dropouts.
Phase D: Report
Return one consolidated in-chat report with the table, issue one-liners, gaps or dropouts, and the race rule when used.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

