source-command-execute
Skill0 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
Implement a feature from a plan file
- Reads credentials
In this repository55 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- agent-developmentSkill
- agent-teamsSkill
- ai-sdkSkill
- analyzing-financial-statementsSkill
- cache-componentsSkill
- chrome-devtoolsSkill
- Codex-automation-recommenderSkill
- Codex-md-improverSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- Command DevelopmentSkill
- creating-financial-modelsSkill
- data-visualizationSkill
- debugSkill
- develop-ai-functions-exampleSkill
- evolve-ai-layerSkill
- excalidraw-diagramSkill
- find-skillsSkill
- frontend-designSkill
- Hook DevelopmentSkill
- make-skill-templateSkill
- markdown-to-htmlSkill
- mcp-builderSkill
- MCP IntegrationSkill
- pdfSkill
- playwrightSkill
- Plugin SettingsSkill
- Plugin StructureSkill
- refactorSkill
- researchSkill
- security-best-practicesSkill
- skill-creatorSkill
- Skill DevelopmentSkill
- smithery-ai-cliSkill
- source-command-commit-and-deploySkill
- source-command-commitSkill
- source-command-create-prdSkill
- source-command-create-rulesSkill
- source-command-empty-redeploySkill
- source-command-evaluateSkill
- source-command-handoffSkill
- source-command-plan-featureSkill
- source-command-primeSkill
- source-command-reviewSkill
- source-command-self-healSkill
- source-command-validateSkill
- sql-queriesSkill
- statistical-analysisSkill
- vscode-ext-localizationSkill
- webapp-testingSkill
- web-artifacts-builderSkill
- web-design-guidelinesSkill
- Writing Hookify RulesSkill
- xlsxSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
15 rules. About 0 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈10
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 8
Use this skill when the user asks to run the migrated source command execute.
- Very specific: line 17
Read the entire plan at: {user-provided arguments}
- Distinctive: line 23
Read the ENTIRE plan before writing any code.
- Distinctive: line 25
All tasks and their dependency order
- Very specific: line 37
All feature execution happens in an isolated git worktree.
- Distinctive: line 83
Verify: after each file change:
- Distinctive: line 100
If it fails: read the error, fix the root cause, re-run
- Distinctive: line 101
Only proceed to the next level when the current one passes
- Distinctive: line 107
If the plan includes E2E or manual validation steps:
- Very specific: line 153
If the plan contains a ## Contract section, prompt the user to run adversarial evaluation:
- Very specific: line 165
Do not run /evaluate automatically — the user may want to do manual testing first.
- Distinctive: line 171
Follow project conventions from AGENTS.md at all times
- Distinctive: line 172
If a task is ambiguous, use existing codebase patterns as guidance
- Distinctive: line 173
If you must deviate from the plan, document why
- Distinctive: line 174
Never skip validation steps
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
source-command-execute
Use this skill when the user asks to run the migrated source command execute. Original argument hint: <path-to-plan.md>.
Command Template
Execute: Implement from Plan
Plan File
Read the entire plan at: {user-provided arguments}
Step 1: Read and Understand
Read the ENTIRE plan before writing any code. Understand:
- All tasks and their dependency order
- Files to create vs modify
- Validation commands to run
- Testing strategy and expected outcomes
- Environment requirements
Do NOT start implementing until you have the full picture.
Step 2: Set Up Worktree
All feature execution happens in an isolated git worktree. Check the plan's ## Worktree section for the branch name and path.
git branch --show-current
git worktree listIf NOT already in the correct worktree, create one:
# From the main repo directory
git worktree add {worktree-path} -b {branch-name}
cd {worktree-path}If a worktree already exists for this feature (e.g., resuming work), navigate to it:
cd {worktree-path}Verify Preconditions
git status
git branch --show-currentCheck:
- You are in the worktree directory, on the feature branch
- Working tree is clean (or only has expected changes)
- Any required env vars are set (check
.envor.env.example) - Dependencies are installed (run the install command — worktrees share
node_modulesbut may need setup)
Step 3: Execute Tasks in Order
Work through each task sequentially, respecting dependency ordering.
For each task:
- Read the target file(s) before modifying — never edit blind
- Read any "Must-Read Files" referenced in the plan
- Implement the change following project patterns from AGENTS.md
- Verify after each file change:
- Syntax is correct
- Imports resolve
- Types check (if applicable)
- No obvious regressions
Fix errors immediately — do not accumulate them.
Step 4: Run Validation (per plan)
Execute ALL validation commands from the plan in the specified order.
For each level:
- Run the command
- If it fails: read the error, fix the root cause, re-run
- Only proceed to the next level when the current one passes
Step 5: End-to-End Testing
If the plan includes E2E or manual validation steps:
- Start the application
- Walk through every user journey described
- Verify expected outcomes
- Document any deviations
Step 6: Completion Report
## Execution Report: {Feature Name}
### Tasks Completed
- [x] Task 1: {description} — {files changed}
- [x] Task 2: {description} — {files changed}
### Files Created
- `path/to/file` — {purpose}
### Files Modified
- `path/to/file` — {what changed}
### Validation Results
- Lint: PASS / FAIL
- Types: PASS / FAIL
- Unit tests: PASS / FAIL ({N} passed)
- Integration: PASS / FAIL
- E2E: PASS / FAIL
### Manual Verification
{What was tested manually and results}
### Notes
{Any deviations from plan, unexpected findings, follow-up work}Step 7: Contract Evaluation
If the plan contains a ## Contract section, prompt the user to run adversarial evaluation:
Implementation complete. This plan has a Tier {N} contract with {X} criteria.
Next step: /evaluate {path-to-plan.md}
This will spawn a fresh evaluator sub-agent that grades the implementation
against the contract criteria. The evaluator does NOT see this conversation —
only the contract, code diff, and AGENTS.md.Do not run /evaluate automatically — the user may want to do manual testing first.
Rules
- Follow project conventions from AGENTS.md at all times
- If a task is ambiguous, use existing codebase patterns as guidance
- If you must deviate from the plan, document why
- Never skip validation steps
- Fix failing tests by fixing implementation, not by weakening tests
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

