npm-release-via-github-actions
Skill882 starsChanged 16 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use this skill whenever the user asks for a new npm version, npm release, package release, new release, version bump, publishing to npm, cutting a GitHub release, tagging a release, or anything similar. It publishes through GitHub Actions and GitHub Releases, not from the local machine, and uses Changesets to generate CHANGELOG.md/release notes. Trigger even for casual phrasing like "ship a release", "bump npm", "publish the package", or "make a new version".
- Installs packages
- Commits and pushes
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
40 rules. About 0 are common, 24 are distinctive, and 16 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈24
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
16
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 14
Do not publish from the local machine.
- Distinctive: line 16
Avoid these commands unless the user explicitly overrides this skill for an unusual emergency:
- Very specific: line 52
If there is no GitHub Actions publish workflow, stop and explain that one must be added or fixed.
- Distinctive: line 58
Ensure you are on the intended branch, usually main.
- Distinctive: line 59
If there are unrelated or user-owned uncommitted changes, pause and ask before including, stashing, or working around them.
- Distinctive: line 68
If there are no changesets but there are user-visible changes to release, pause and ask whether to add a changeset.
- Distinctive: line 69
If changesets exist, make sure their text is user-facing.
- Very specific: line 71
If a pending changeset uses minor for a non-breaking change, edit its frontmatter to patch before versioning.
- Very specific: line 72
Use major only when the user explicitly requests a breaking/major release.
- Distinctive: line 73
If you believe the pending changes introduce a breaking change but the user has not explicitly requested a major release, pause before …
- Very specific: line 77
Use the current date at release time for YYYYMM (for example, date +%Y%m).
- Very specific: line 78
Keep the current MAJOR unless the user explicitly requests a breaking/major release.
- Very specific: line 80
If the current package version already has the target MAJOR and release-month YYYYMM, use current patch + 1.
- Very specific: line 82
If npm already has the computed version, increment only PATCH until an unpublished version is found.
- Very specific: line 83
If the user says patch, minor, new version, new release, publish, or similar without an exact version, still use this CalVer algorithm.
- Distinctive: line 84
If the user gives an exact version, use it only when they clearly intend that exact value.
- Distinctive: line 85
If the computed CalVer target would be lower than or equal to the current package version because of clock/version inconsistency, stop and …
- Very specific: line 88
Run the Changesets version step after normalizing non-breaking changesets to patch:
- Very specific: line 97
Update the newly generated CHANGELOG.md heading to match the computed CalVer version if Changesets used a different heading.
- Very specific: line 99
Do not use plain npm version <new-version> because it creates a local git tag as a side effect.
- Very specific: line 108
If the lockfile mismatch persists, stop and resolve it before committing.
- Distinctive: line 111
Run the repository's normal verification commands, for example:
- Distinctive: line 117
If checks fail, fix the issue or report it.
- Distinctive: line 120
Commit only intended release changes.
- Distinctive: line 132
If there are other intentional changes required for the release, include them deliberately and mention them.
- Distinctive: line 135
Prefer release notes from the generated changelog instead of generic generated notes.
- Distinctive: line 137
Use the pushed commit on main as the target:
- Very specific: line 144
If a clean notes file is not practical, --generate-notes is acceptable, but prefer the Changesets-generated text because it is curated.
- Distinctive: line 146
If the user specifically wants to review notes first, create a draft release, then publish it through GitHub when approved.
- Distinctive: line 157
If it fails, inspect logs:
- Distinctive: line 164
After the workflow succeeds, verify:
- Distinctive: line 169
If npm has not updated yet, wait briefly and check again.
- Very specific: line 173
If a GitHub Actions publish run failed due to a transient infrastructure issue, prefer gh run rerun <run-id> --failed or rerun the workflow …
- Very specific: line 174
If using workflow_dispatch, pass the intended ref/tag explicitly where possible:
- Distinctive: line 178
Use this mainly for reruns or repositories designed around manual dispatch.
- Distinctive: line 179
If the npm version already exists, npm will reject publishing.
- Distinctive: line 180
If a GitHub Release/tag was created incorrectly, fix it on GitHub with care and tell the user exactly what changed.
- Very specific: line 181
Never use local npm publish as a workaround for a GitHub Actions or npm provenance issue.
- Distinctive: line 185
After completing or attempting a release, summarize concisely:
- Distinctive: line 189
Commit hash and pushed branch
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Publish npm packages via GitHub Actions
The user explicitly does not want local npm publishing. For release requests, route publishing through the repository's GitHub Actions workflow, usually triggered by a published GitHub Release.
This project also uses Changesets for changelog generation. Release prep should consume .changeset/*.md fragments into CHANGELOG.md before the GitHub Release is created.
Core rules
Do not publish from the local machine.
Avoid these commands unless the user explicitly overrides this skill for an unusual emergency:
npm publishnpm run publish:npmpnpm publish,yarn publish, or equivalent package-manager publish commands- any local publish workaround after a GitHub Actions problem
It is OK to run local safety checks and release-prep commands that do not publish, such as:
npm run verifynpm run buildnpm run pack:drynpm run changelog:statusnpm run release:versionnpm version <version> --no-git-tag-versionwhen an exact custom version needs to be enforced
First inspect the repository release setup
Before acting, read:
package.jsonfor package name, current version, scripts, and package manager.package-lock.json,pnpm-lock.yaml, oryarn.lockif present, so version bumps keep lockfiles consistent..changeset/config.jsonand pending.changeset/*.mdfiles, if present..github/workflows/publish.ymlor similarly named release workflow.
Confirm the workflow publishes on GitHub, preferably from one of these triggers:
on:
release:
types: [published]
workflow_dispatch:For the pi-web repository, the expected workflow is .github/workflows/publish.yml; it publishes with npm publish --access public --provenance from GitHub Actions. Use the GitHub Release path by default.
If there is no GitHub Actions publish workflow, stop and explain that one must be added or fixed. Do not fall back to local npm publish.
Standard release workflow
- Check repo state
- Run
git status --short --branch. - Ensure you are on the intended branch, usually
main. - If there are unrelated or user-owned uncommitted changes, pause and ask before including, stashing, or working around them.
- Pull/rebase only when it is safe and the user has not left local work that could be disrupted.
- Run
- Review and normalize pending changesets
- Run:
npm run changelog:status - Inspect
.changeset/*.mdfiles. - If there are no changesets but there are user-visible changes to release, pause and ask whether to add a changeset. Do not create a low-quality release note just to proceed.
- If changesets exist, make sure their text is user-facing.
- For
pi-web, non-breaking changesets must usepatcheven for new features. The package uses CalVer shaped as semver:MAJOR.YYYYMM.PATCH. The semverminorposition is the release month, not feature size. - If a pending changeset uses
minorfor a non-breaking change, edit its frontmatter topatchbefore versioning. Do not ask the user whether to use a patch increase or date change. - Use
majoronly when the user explicitly requests a breaking/major release. - If you believe the pending changes introduce a breaking change but the user has not explicitly requested a major release, pause before versioning and ask the user to confirm whether this should be released as a breaking major version or changed to remain non-breaking.
- Run:
- Compute the
pi-webCalVer version- For
pi-web, always compute the version from the release date asMAJOR.YYYYMM.PATCH. - Use the current date at release time for
YYYYMM(for example,date +%Y%m). Do not ask whether to use a same-month patch increase or a date change. - Keep the current
MAJORunless the user explicitly requests a breaking/major release. Do not infer or perform a major version bump on your own. - Set
PATCHdeterministically:- If the current package version already has the target
MAJORand release-monthYYYYMM, use current patch + 1. - Otherwise use patch
0for the first release of that major/month. - If npm already has the computed version, increment only
PATCHuntil an unpublished version is found.
- If the current package version already has the target
- If the user says
patch,minor,new version,new release,publish, or similar without an exact version, still use this CalVer algorithm. Treatminoras a non-breaking release request, not as permission to let Changesets increment semver minor arbitrarily. - If the user gives an exact version, use it only when they clearly intend that exact value. Otherwise preserve the CalVer rule above.
- If the computed CalVer target would be lower than or equal to the current package version because of clock/version inconsistency, stop and explain the inconsistency instead of inventing a non-CalVer version.
- For
- Generate changelog and version files
- Run the Changesets version step after normalizing non-breaking changesets to
patch:npm run release:version - This consumes pending
.changeset/*.mdfragments, updatesCHANGELOG.md, updatespackage.json, and updates the npm lockfile when applicable. - Changesets may produce a semver bump that does not match the computed CalVer target, especially on the first release of a new month. That is expected; enforce the computed target with:
npm version <computed-calver-version> --no-git-tag-version - Update the newly generated
CHANGELOG.mdheading to match the computed CalVer version if Changesets used a different heading. This manual changelog heading edit is acceptable during release prep; normal development should still use changeset fragments instead. - Review the generated
CHANGELOG.mdsection. It should be suitable for GitHub Release notes. - Do not use plain
npm version <new-version>because it creates a local git tag as a side effect; releases should be controlled via GitHub. - Sync the lockfile to the final version.
npm run release:version(Changesets) updatespackage.jsonbut does not reliably rewritepackage-lock.json, and the CalVer-enforcingnpm version --no-git-tag-versiononly touches the lock when it actually runs. Either path can leave the committedpackage-lock.jsonbehind at the previous version, which then resurfaces as an unexpected diff after the nextnpm install. After the version is finalized, always resync the lockfile without touchingnode_modules:npm install --package-lock-only - Confirm the lockfile now matches
package.jsonbefore continuing:node -e "const v=require('./package.json').version, l=require('./package-lock.json'); if (l.version!==v || l.packages[''].version!==v) { console.error('lockfile version mismatch:', l.version, l.packages[''].version, 'expected', v); process.exit(1); } console.log('lockfile in sync at', v);" - If the lockfile mismatch persists, stop and resolve it before committing; do not ship a release whose
package-lock.jsonversion disagrees withpackage.json.
- Run the Changesets version step after normalizing non-breaking changesets to
- Run checks before creating the release
- Run the repository's normal verification commands, for example:
npm run verify npm run build npm run pack:dry - If checks fail, fix the issue or report it. Do not create the GitHub Release until the release commit is sound.
- Run the repository's normal verification commands, for example:
- Commit and push the release prep
- Commit only intended release changes. Typical files include:
package.jsonpackage-lock.jsonCHANGELOG.md- consumed/deleted
.changeset/*.mdfragments
- Before staging, confirm
package-lock.jsonis actually in the diff and carries the new version. Ifgit status --shortdoes not showpackage-lock.jsonas modified whilepackage.jsonchanged version, the lockfile sync in step 4 was missed — go back and runnpm install --package-lock-only. Never commit a release wherepackage.jsonadvanced butpackage-lock.jsondid not. - Use:
git add package.json package-lock.json CHANGELOG.md .changeset git commit -m "chore(release): v<new-version>" git push origin main - If there are other intentional changes required for the release, include them deliberately and mention them.
- Commit only intended release changes. Typical files include:
- Create a GitHub Release to trigger publishing
- Prefer release notes from the generated changelog instead of generic generated notes.
- Extract the new version's section from
CHANGELOG.mdinto a temporary notes file if useful. - Use the pushed commit on
mainas the target:gh release create v<new-version> \ --target main \ --title "v<new-version>" \ --notes-file /tmp/pi-web-release-notes-v<new-version>.md - If a clean notes file is not practical,
--generate-notesis acceptable, but prefer the Changesets-generated text because it is curated. - Creating a non-draft published release triggers
on: release: types: [published]. - If the user specifically wants to review notes first, create a draft release, then publish it through GitHub when approved. Remember: draft creation will not trigger publishing until it is published.
- Monitor GitHub Actions
- Find the publish run:
gh run list --workflow publish.yml --limit 5 - Watch it:
gh run watch <run-id> - If it fails, inspect logs:
gh run view <run-id> --log-failed - Fix by committing and creating a new release/tag if needed, or rerun the failed GitHub Actions job when the failure is transient. Do not publish locally as a workaround.
- Find the publish run:
- Verify npm registry publication
- After the workflow succeeds, verify:
npm view <package-name> version npm view <package-name>@<new-version> dist.tarball - If npm has not updated yet, wait briefly and check again.
- After the workflow succeeds, verify:
Reruns and special cases
- If a GitHub Actions publish run failed due to a transient infrastructure issue, prefer
gh run rerun <run-id> --failedor rerun the workflow in GitHub. - If using
workflow_dispatch, pass the intended ref/tag explicitly where possible:
Use this mainly for reruns or repositories designed around manual dispatch. For normal releases, prefer a published GitHub Release.gh workflow run publish.yml --ref v<version> - If the npm version already exists, npm will reject publishing. Bump to a new version and create a new release; do not try to overwrite an existing npm version.
- If a GitHub Release/tag was created incorrectly, fix it on GitHub with care and tell the user exactly what changed.
- Never use local
npm publishas a workaround for a GitHub Actions or npm provenance issue.
Final response format
After completing or attempting a release, summarize concisely:
- Version requested/released
- Changelog source: generated
CHANGELOG.mdsection or other notes used - Commit hash and pushed branch
- GitHub Release URL
- GitHub Actions run URL and status
- npm verification result, if published
- Any follow-up needed from the user
In this repository8 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- changeset-changelogSkill
- code-quality-architectureSkill
- documentation-guideSkill
- testing-guideSkill
- ux-guideSkill
- relay-runnerSkill
- relaySkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

