agentleFS
jiten-singh-shahijiten-singh-shahi/salesforce-claude-code/.cursor/skills/sf-apex-enterprise-patterns/SKILL.md

sf-apex-enterprise-patterns

Skill15 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub

Use when implementing Salesforce Apex Enterprise Patterns (FFLIB) — Selector, Domain, Service, Unit of Work layers. Do NOT use for simple orgs or constraints.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

10 rules. About 0 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈10

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    When building Apex applications that will scale beyond 5 developers or 50 custom classes

    line 17
  2. Distinctive:

    When trigger logic is becoming complex and duplicated across multiple contexts

    line 18
  3. Distinctive:

    When SOQL queries are scattered throughout classes instead of centralized

    line 19
  4. Distinctive:

    When implementing FFLIB (Andy Fawcett) patterns in a Salesforce project

    line 20
  5. Distinctive:

    When separating business logic from trigger context to improve testability

    line 21
  6. Distinctive:

    When a service method needs to coordinate inserts, updates, and deletes atomically

    line 22
  7. Distinctive:

    No SOQL — delegate to Selectors

    line 206
  8. Distinctive:

    No direct DML — use Unit of Work

    line 207
  9. Distinctive:

    When trigger logic grows beyond simple field defaults, introduce the Domain layer.

    line 316
  10. Distinctive:

    When a service needs to insert/update multiple related objects, introduce UoW for atomicity.

    line 320

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Apex Enterprise Patterns

Implementation guidance for Apex Enterprise Patterns (AEP / FFLIB). Covers the four-layer architecture, pragmatic adoption, and when NOT to use them. Constraint rules live in sf-apex-constraints.

Reference: @../_reference/ENTERPRISE_PATTERNS.md


When to Use

  • When building Apex applications that will scale beyond 5 developers or 50 custom classes
  • When trigger logic is becoming complex and duplicated across multiple contexts
  • When SOQL queries are scattered throughout classes instead of centralized
  • When implementing FFLIB (Andy Fawcett) patterns in a Salesforce project
  • When separating business logic from trigger context to improve testability
  • When a service method needs to coordinate inserts, updates, and deletes atomically

When NOT to Use

  • Simple automations: A before-insert trigger that sets a default status
  • One-off scripts: Data migration or fix scripts
  • Small orgs (< 5 developers, < 50 custom classes)
  • Read-only visualizations: A Selector is often sufficient

The rule: introduce a layer when the absence of that layer is causing a real problem.


Architecture Overview

Trigger / Controller / API
        |
   Service Layer        <- Transaction boundary, orchestration
        |
  Domain Layer          <- Business rules on record collections
        |
  Selector Layer        <- All SOQL queries
        |
   Unit of Work         <- All DML (atomic commit)

Selector Layer

Selectors own all SOQL queries for an object. No SOQL appears outside a Selector.

Naming: {ObjectNamePlural}Selector — e.g., AccountsSelector, OpportunitiesSelector

Without FFLIB

public with sharing class AccountsSelector {

    @TestVisible
    private static AccountsSelector instance;

    public static AccountsSelector newInstance() {
        if (instance == null) instance = new AccountsSelector();
        return instance;
    }

    public List<Account> selectById(Set<Id> accountIds) {
        return [
            SELECT Id, Name, Type, OwnerId, AnnualRevenue,
                   Customer_Tier__c, CreditLimit__c
            FROM Account WHERE Id IN :accountIds
            WITH USER_MODE ORDER BY Name
        ];
    }

    public List<Account> selectWithOpenOpportunitiesById(Set<Id> accountIds) {
        return [
            SELECT Id, Name, AnnualRevenue, Customer_Tier__c,
                   (SELECT Id, Name, Amount, CloseDate, StageName
                    FROM Opportunities WHERE IsClosed = false
                    ORDER BY CloseDate ASC)
            FROM Account WHERE Id IN :accountIds WITH USER_MODE
        ];
    }
}

With FFLIB

public with sharing class AccountsSelector extends fflib_SObjectSelector {

    public static AccountsSelector newInstance() {
        return (AccountsSelector) Application.Selector.newInstance(Account.SObjectType);
    }

    public Schema.SObjectType getSObjectType() { return Account.SObjectType; }

    public List<Schema.SObjectField> getSObjectFieldList() {
        return new List<Schema.SObjectField>{
            Account.Id, Account.Name, Account.Type,
            Account.OwnerId, Account.AnnualRevenue
        };
    }

    public List<Account> selectById(Set<Id> accountIds) {
        return (List<Account>) selectSObjectsById(accountIds);
    }
}

Domain Layer

Encapsulates all business logic for a collection of records of the same type. Replaces trigger logic.

Naming: {ObjectNamePlural} — e.g., Accounts, Opportunities

public with sharing class Accounts {

    private final List<Account> records;
    private final Map<Id, Account> existingRecords;

    public static Accounts newInstance(List<Account> records) {
        return new Accounts(records, null);
    }

    public static Accounts newInstance(List<Account> records, Map<Id, Account> existing) {
        return new Accounts(records, existing);
    }

    private Accounts(List<Account> records, Map<Id, Account> existingRecords) {
        this.records         = records;
        this.existingRecords = existingRecords;
    }

    public void onBeforeInsert() {
        setDefaultCustomerTier();
        validateRequiredFields();
    }

    public void onBeforeUpdate() {
        validateRequiredFields();
        preventDowngradingPremiumTier();
    }

    public void setDefaultCustomerTier() {
        for (Account acc : records) {
            if (String.isBlank(acc.Customer_Tier__c)) acc.Customer_Tier__c = 'Standard';
        }
    }

    public void validateRequiredFields() {
        for (Account acc : records) {
            if (acc.Type == 'Customer' && String.isBlank(acc.Industry)) {
                acc.Industry.addError('Industry is required for Customer account type.');
            }
        }
    }

    public void preventDowngradingPremiumTier() {
        for (Account acc : records) {
            Account existing = existingRecords?.get(acc.Id);
            if (existing == null) continue;
            if (existing.Customer_Tier__c == 'Premium'
                    && acc.Customer_Tier__c != 'Premium') {
                acc.Customer_Tier__c.addError(
                    'Premium tier downgrade requires approval.'
                );
            }
        }
    }
}

Trigger Using Domain Layer

trigger AccountTrigger on Account (
    before insert, before update, after insert, after update
) {
    if (Trigger.isBefore && Trigger.isInsert) {
        Accounts.newInstance(Trigger.new).onBeforeInsert();
    } else if (Trigger.isBefore && Trigger.isUpdate) {
        Accounts.newInstance(Trigger.new, Trigger.oldMap).onBeforeUpdate();
    }
}

Service Layer

Orchestrates business processes that span multiple objects or require a full transaction boundary.

Naming: {ObjectNamePlural}Service — e.g., AccountsService

Rules:

  1. Static methods only — services are stateless
  2. No SOQL — delegate to Selectors
  3. No direct DML — use Unit of Work
  4. Owns the transaction boundary
  5. Calls Domain methods for record-level rules
public with sharing class AccountsService {

    public static void upgradeToPremium(Set<Id> accountIds) {
        List<Account> accounts = AccountsSelector.newInstance()
            .selectWithOpenOpportunitiesById(accountIds);

        if (accounts.isEmpty()) {
            throw new UpgradeException('No accounts found for IDs: ' + accountIds);
        }

        // Validate
        List<String> errors = validateForUpgrade(accounts);
        if (!errors.isEmpty()) {
            throw new UpgradeException(String.join(errors, '\n'));
        }

        // Build Unit of Work
        fflib_ISObjectUnitOfWork uow = Application.UnitOfWork.newInstance();
        for (Account acc : accounts) {
            acc.Customer_Tier__c  = 'Premium';
            acc.CreditLimit__c    = 100000.00;
            uow.registerDirty(acc);

            uow.registerNew(new Opportunity(
                Name      = acc.Name + ' - Premium Welcome',
                AccountId = acc.Id,
                StageName = 'Qualification',
                CloseDate = Date.today().addDays(30)
            ));
        }

        uow.commitWork(); // One atomic DML transaction
    }

    public class UpgradeException extends Exception {}
}

Unit of Work

Accumulates all DML operations and commits them in a single, ordered, atomic transaction.

Lightweight Implementation (No FFLIB)

public class SimpleUnitOfWork {

    private List<SObject> toInsert  = new List<SObject>();
    private List<SObject> toUpdate  = new List<SObject>();
    private List<SObject> toDelete  = new List<SObject>();

    public void registerNew(SObject record) { toInsert.add(record); }
    public void registerDirty(SObject record) { toUpdate.add(record); }
    public void registerDeleted(SObject record) { toDelete.add(record); }

    public void commitWork() {
        Savepoint sp = Database.setSavepoint();
        try {
            if (!toInsert.isEmpty()) insert toInsert;
            if (!toUpdate.isEmpty()) update toUpdate;
            if (!toDelete.isEmpty()) delete toDelete;
        } catch (Exception e) {
            Database.rollback(sp);
            throw e;
        }
    }
}

FFLIB Application Factory

public class Application {
    public static final fflib_Application.UnitOfWorkFactory UnitOfWork =
        new fflib_Application.UnitOfWorkFactory(
            new List<SObjectType>{
                Account.SObjectType,
                Contact.SObjectType,
                Opportunity.SObjectType
            }
        );

    public static final fflib_Application.SelectorFactory Selector =
        new fflib_Application.SelectorFactory(
            new Map<SObjectType, Type>{
                Account.SObjectType     => AccountsSelector.class,
                Opportunity.SObjectType => OpportunitiesSelector.class
            }
        );
}

Pragmatic Adoption Path

Phase 1: Selector + Service (Most Immediate Value)

Centralize SOQL into Selectors, business processes into Services. No FFLIB dependency needed.

Phase 2: Add Domain Layer for Trigger Logic

When trigger logic grows beyond simple field defaults, introduce the Domain layer.

Phase 3: Add Unit of Work for Complex Transactions

When a service needs to insert/update multiple related objects, introduce UoW for atomicity.


FFLIB Installation

# Clone and deploy FFLIB
git clone https://github.com/apex-enterprise-patterns/fflib-apex-common.git
git clone https://github.com/apex-enterprise-patterns/fflib-apex-mocks.git
sf project deploy start --source-dir fflib-apex-common/sfdx-source --target-org my-org
sf project deploy start --source-dir fflib-apex-mocks/sfdx-source --target-org my-org

FFLIB is typically deployed as unmanaged source code directly from the cloned repositories, not as a versioned managed package.


Related

  • Agents: sf-review-agent, sf-architect — For interactive guidance

Guardrails

  • sf-apex-constraints — Governs all Apex code including enterprise pattern implementations

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.