agentleFS
jisuzzzzjisuzzzz/haechi/skills/impact-map/SKILL.md

impact-map

Skill17 starsChanged 14 days agoMITView on GitHub

Lists code outside a diff that uses the exports and signatures the diff changed. Use before reviewing or finishing a change that touches exported functions, types, components or Python top-level definitions.

2 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈0

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Run node <tools>/impact-map.mjs --base <base> [paths] (the tools folder is in the task's "[haechi] Repo facts" block, or two levels above …

    line 8

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Impact map

Run node <tools>/impact-map.mjs --base <base> [paths] (the tools folder is in the task's "[haechi] Repo facts" block, or two levels above this skill's folder). Add --json for machine-readable output.

For each changed symbol it lists the files outside the diff that import or use it. Read every consumer whose use depends on what changed — argument order and meaning, optional versus required fields, return shape, units, call order — and check it still holds. A consumer that breaks is a defect with both sides quoted. The tool searches by name, so a hit can be an unrelated symbol with the same name; confirm before reporting.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.