show-me
Skill11 starsChanged 28 days agoMITView on GitHub
在代码架构、数据流、调用关系、状态变化或层级结构用短文本难以讲清时使用聚焦的 ASCII、Mermaid、diff 或 HTML 可视化;用户要求像给五岁孩子讲解(eli5)或用最简单的图解说明原理时也使用。不为单一事实、简单步骤或纯视觉设计审查额外制作图表。
79 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- waltyou/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- n1kben/agentstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Mharbulous/probanda-devtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ninondev/show-metheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- timmo001/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 7, 2026
- MatthewYe/autopilot-toolkittheir own version, first seen Nov 7, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use maintain-formal-verification-skill, create-formal-verification-skill and 9 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
TheOnlyFusionCubeSkillmaintain-formal-verification-skill
Bring a project's formal verification back in line with the code after the code changes: find the commits that touched verified code, update the model, harness, or properties to describe the code as it is now, rerun, and say whether each failure is drift in the verification or a bug in the code. Use for /maintain-formal-verification-skill, \"is the model still true to the code\", or after merges and refactors that touched verified code without rechecking it.
Also in 4 projects that use this
TheOnlyFusionCubeSkillcreate-formal-verification-skill
Generate a project-local skill that formally verifies the code where a bug costs the most and tests reach the least, in any language, with whichever verification tool fits. Use for /create-formal-verification-skill, \"model-check this race\", \"prove this invariant\", or when concurrency, retries, state machines, parsers, or unsafe code need more than tests.
Also in 4 projects that use this
AnthropicSkilleli5
Explain a topic like I'm a 5 year old. Use when the user types /eli5 <topic> or asks for a dead-simple picture explainer of how something works.
Also in 10 projects that use this
drafaelSkillin-your-own-words
Restate the user's goals and the problem they are trying to solve to check understanding. Manual invocation only; use when the user explicitly invokes in-your-own-words or requests this understanding check. Do not solve the task or rewrite the assistant's last answer.
Also in 4 projects that use this
jaydubya818Skillcreate-verification-skill
Use when a repository needs a repeatable driver that proves real UI, CLI, or service behavior.
Also in 8 projects that use this
jaydubya818Skillmaintain-verification-skill
Use when a project's verification driver or feature map may be stale.
Also in 7 projects that use this
- +1 more from TheOnlyFusionCube
- +1 more from jaydubya818
Other versions79 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 79
- withcoral/coral★ 4.9ksame name
- deadlock-mod-manager/deadlock-mod-manager★ 584same name
- kv0906/pm-kit★ 138same name
- Dimon94/dverity★ 107same name
- Dimon94/skills★ 107same name
- charlie947/show-me★ 70same name
- kv0906/cc-skills★ 42same name
- Melvynx/ai-maxxing-skills★ 32same name
- IgorGanapolsky/ThumbGate★ 30same name
- Integralist/agent-skills★ 23same name
69 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository20 other files it gives its agents.
- absorb-skillSkill
- agent-healthSkill
- architecture-decision-recordSkill
- benchmark-checklistSkill
- brainstormingSkill
- codecov-coverageSkill
- frontend-design-reviewSkill
- gh-stackSkill
- linux-performance-analysisSkill
- loop-on-ciSkill
- pull-requestSkill
- requesting-code-reviewSkill
- runtime-verificationSkill
- shared-memorySkill
- simplifySkill
- systematic-debuggingSkill
- technical-writingSkill
- test-scenariosSkill
- writing-plansSkill
- x-tweet-fetcherSkill
The file
Files
聚焦可视化说明
用最小的可视化回答当前问题。可视化必须让关系、顺序、层级或变化比短文本更容易理解;如果一句话或短列表已经清楚,直接回答,不创建图表。
选择视图
| 需要表达 | 默认形式 |
| 算法、条件和短控制流 | 伪代码或短流程图 |
| 调用关系、组件归属、文件职责 | 调用树、组件树或浅层文件树 |
| 代码架构及跨组件的数据流 | Mermaid flowchart |
| 三个以上参与者的时序 | Mermaid sequenceDiagram |
| 修改前后结构或状态变化 | 聚焦 diff |
| 界面布局、密集比较或需要交互探索 | HTML 页面 |
优先用一张图回答问题;图内用分组同时展示模块或阶段之间的流转及各模块内部处理。只有分支过密、单图难以阅读时才补充分图。
详细格式示例见 references/examples.md,需要对应形式时再读取。
代码架构与数据流
用户要理解代码如何运转时,参考“组件或关键类型 + 工作协程 + 通道/队列 + 外部系统”的结构图,而不是只画文件依赖。先从实际代码追踪消息的生产、传递、消费和返回路径;图中只保留回答问题必需的字段、入口方法和并发单元。
- 用容器或分组表示归属,用带方向的箭头表示数据流;箭头标明消息、
read/write或调用动作。区分创建/持有关系与消息流,勿用同一种箭头暗示两种含义。 - 把通道/队列、工作协程、网络或进程边界画成独立节点;有缓冲、扇出、回流或异步处理时标出实际路径。不要凭类型字段推断运行时流向。
- 在图旁按发生顺序说明数据从哪里来、如何转换或排队、由谁消费、最终到哪里;点明关键分支和阻塞/异步边界。图中的标签与文字使用相同名称。
- 在同一图中用边界圈出模块或阶段,边界内画处理步骤,跨边界箭头画输入输出和交接;让读者能沿箭头从入口读到结果。复杂分支才另画分图,并用同名节点标明它接回主图的位置。
- 只展开理解当前问题所需的模块和路径,避免照搬所有字段、方法或协程。参考 架构与数据流示例。
面向外行的通俗图解
用户输入 /eli5、要求“像给五岁孩子讲”或用最简单的图解说明原理时,读者是完全不了解该主题的人:
- 默认生成自包含的 HTML 图解,大图为主、文字极少;用户指定其他格式时,在该格式里保持同样简单、以图为主的讲法。问题本身一两句话就能说清时直接回答,不生成文件。
- 先确认核心事实,再选类比;类比不能改变关键因果关系。用一句短注说明类比在哪里不成立,避免读者把简化模型当成完整实现。
- 主题依赖最新事实(版本、价格、现状)时,先查可信来源再解释,不凭记忆。
- HTML 无法生成、打开或验证时,退回简短的 ASCII 或 Markdown 图解,不让格式阻塞解释。
最小流程
- 用一句话写清用户需要理解的关系或变化。
- 从代码、配置、用户提供的内容或已验证事实中提取最小节点和连接。
- 选择上表中的最简单形式,删除与问题无关的文件、字段、组件和分支。
- 在图旁用一两句话解释读图方式和最重要的结论。
- 复核节点名称、方向、顺序和状态;无法确认的关系标记为“推测”或省略,不把示意图画成已验证事实。
HTML 边界
只有静态文本视图明显不足时才创建 HTML。沿用目标产品的颜色、字体和组件;没有真实设计系统时使用克制的中性样式,不虚构品牌。
- 使用真实标签与经过验证的数据;示例数据必须明确标记。
- 同时检查桌面和窄屏布局。
- 生成后实际打开或渲染,确认无脚本错误、遮挡、溢出和不可读文本。
- 用户未要求持久文件时,写到安全的临时或任务输出目录,不污染源码树。
- 创建文件不等于授权发布或部署。
输出契约
最终结果包括:
- 可视化本体或生成文件的可点击路径;
- 一段简短说明,指出视图覆盖的范围;
- 任何为了清晰而省略、简化或仍未验证的部分;
- HTML 的打开或渲染验证结果。
不要用装饰性图表重复已经清楚的正文,也不要用可视化替代必要的代码、日志或来源证据。
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

