repo-technical-documentation
Skill1 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Exhaustively document an existing repository's technical architecture and implementation details. Use when asked to work through a whole repo and create, update, reconcile, or refresh technical docs covering API endpoints, UI routes and choices, frameworks, libraries and rationale, data models, integrations, jobs, testing, deployment, observability, operational scripts, or stale documentation.
- Reads credentials
In this repository15 other files it gives its agents.
- clarify-before-buildSkill
- client-requirements-to-planSkill
- codebase-prune-reviewSkill
- docker-disk-cleanupSkill
- error-logging-instrumentationSkill
- feature-design-preflightSkill
- frontend-design-qualitySkill
- full-app-reviewSkill
- laptop-currency-maintenanceSkill
- nextjs-vercel-analyticsSkill
- pr-production-gateSkill
- repo-testing-setupSkill
- security-threat-modelSkill
- test-readiness-preflightSkill
- user-action-coverage-reviewSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
12 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 6 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈6
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
6
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 10
Use this skill to produce durable, repo-grounded technical documentation.
- Distinctive: line 16
Start from repo truth: applicable AGENTS.md, tracked files, manifests, source entrypoints, tests, docs, configs, scripts, workflows, and …
- Very specific: line 18
Never print or document secret values.
- Very specific: line 21
Prefer updating existing technical docs over creating duplicate docs.
- Distinctive: line 22
Keep generated artifacts deterministic and repo-contained.
- Distinctive: line 27
Read parent and repo-local instructions.
- Very specific: line 30
Run this skill's helper, scripts/repo_inventory.py <repo> --format json, resolved relative to this skill directory, for a deterministic …
- Very specific: line 43
Use references/documentation-schema.md for required sections and confidence labels.
- Very specific: line 44
Use references/output-templates.md for the split-doc package.
- Very specific: line 45
Default files under docs/repo-map/ are:
- Distinctive: line 53
If existing docs cover the same subjects, update those files and add only missing companion files.
- Distinctive: line 58
Run lightweight doc checks available in the repo, such as markdown lint or link checks, before broader validation.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Repo Technical Documentation
Purpose
Use this skill to produce durable, repo-grounded technical documentation. The default output is split Markdown docs plus a machine-readable evidence file. Existing technical docs are updated in place when they exist; otherwise create the standard package under docs/repo-map/.
This is a documentation and inventory skill, not a remediation review. Use $full-app-review when the user wants prioritized findings or a fix plan.
Operating Rules
- Start from repo truth: applicable
AGENTS.md, tracked files, manifests, source entrypoints, tests, docs, configs, scripts, workflows, and deployment files. - Enumerate git-tracked files by default with
git ls-files. Consider every tracked file, but path-inventory only for secret-like, generated/build, binary, unreadable, or oversized files. - Never print or document secret values. Do not read
.env*, credential, token, private-key, local provider state, or similar files unless the user explicitly provides a safe fixture. - Tag every material claim as
confirmed,inferred,stale-doc, orunknown. Do not present inferred rationale as fact. - In Plan Mode or report-only requests, do not write docs. Return the proposed doc targets and update plan instead.
- Prefer updating existing technical docs over creating duplicate docs. If no suitable docs exist, create
docs/repo-map/. - Keep generated artifacts deterministic and repo-contained. Do not dirty unrelated tracked files.
Workflow
- Baseline the repo.
- Read parent and repo-local instructions.
- Check
git status --short --untracked-files=all. - Identify existing technical docs, source roots, test roots, package managers, deployment targets, and canonical validation commands.
- Run this skill's helper,
scripts/repo_inventory.py <repo> --format json, resolved relative to this skill directory, for a deterministic first-pass fact inventory when useful.
- Build the evidence map.
- Use
references/discovery-checklist.md. - Map API endpoints, UI routes, user actions, frameworks, libraries, data schemas, integrations, auth/roles, jobs, scripts, tests, deployment/runtime, observability, and docs.
- Record evidence as file paths, line references when inspected directly, manifest entries, config files, and test/doc references.
- Use
- Reconcile existing docs.
- Find docs that already describe architecture, APIs, routes, dependencies, operations, testing, or runbooks.
- Compare documented claims with current repo evidence.
- Mark missing current facts as
confirmed, outdated claims asstale-doc, inferred rationale asinferred, and unresolved rationale or ownership asunknown.
- Write or propose docs.
- Use
references/documentation-schema.mdfor required sections and confidence labels. - Use
references/output-templates.mdfor the split-doc package. - Default files under
docs/repo-map/are:README.mdapi-inventory.mdui-inventory.mddependencies-and-rationale.mddata-integrations-and-jobs.mdvalidation-and-operations.mdevidence.json
- If existing docs cover the same subjects, update those files and add only missing companion files.
- Use
- Validate the documentation.
- Confirm every material statement has evidence or an explicit
unknown. - Re-run the inventory helper after writes and verify
evidence.jsonis current. - Run lightweight doc checks available in the repo, such as markdown lint or link checks, before broader validation.
- Confirm every material statement has evidence or an explicit
Output Expectations
Completion reports must include:
- Docs created or updated.
- Repo truth discovered.
- Existing docs reconciled and stale claims removed or marked.
- Evidence commands run.
- Gaps left as
unknown. - Validation results and any blocked checks.
References
references/discovery-checklist.md: what to inspect during the repo pass.references/documentation-schema.md: confidence tags, evidence rules, and required doc sections.references/output-templates.md: Markdown and JSON output templates.scripts/repo_inventory.py: deterministic tracked-file inventory helper.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

