qa-code-review
Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
代码评审启发式门禁技能:纯标准库扫描源码,识别评审期高危反模式——硬编码密钥(critical/阻断)、SQL 拼接、超长函数、无工单的 TODO/FIXME、遗留调试打印;存在硬编码密钥时产出阻断信号。触发词:"代码评审", "code review", "CR", "评审门禁", "静态检查", "代码质量", or after qa-unit-tdd. 英文触发词(English triggers):code review, CR, static analysis, lint.
In this repository39 other files it gives its agents.
- qa-a11ySkill
- qa-agent-evalSkill
- qa-agent-securitySkill
- qa-api-contractSkill
- qa-api-docSkill
- qa-api-runnerSkill
- qa-archiveSkill
- qa-bug-reportSkill
- qa-bug-verifySkill
- qa-chaosSkill
- qa-ciSkill
- qa-compat-matrixSkill
- qa-env-configSkill
- qa-executionSkill
- qa-exploratorySkill
- qa-flaky-detectSkill
- qa-mobile-autotestSkill
- qa-mutationSkill
- qa-orchestratorSkill
- qa-perf-analysisSkill
- qa-perf-designSkill
- qa-perf-jmeterSkill
- qa-perf-locustSkill
- qa-release-checkSkill
- qa-reportSkill
- qa-req-specSkill
- qa-risk-basedSkill
- qa-security-reportSkill
- qa-security-scanSkill
- qa-synthetic-monitoringSkill
- qa-test-analysisSkill
- qa-test-case-genSkill
- qa-test-dataSkill
- qa-test-strategySkill
- qa-ui-automationSkill
- qa-ui-kbSkill
- qa-ui-testidSkill
- qa-unit-tddSkill
- qa-visual-regressionSkill
The file
Files
qa-code-review 代码评审启发式门禁
在合并 / 发布前,用轻量静态扫描兜底评审容易漏掉的反模式。本技能是启发式 linter,与 qa-security-scan(完整 SAST/DAST 指引)互补:前者查"评审纪律",后者查"安全漏洞"。
⚠️ 治理门禁 · 不执行外部工具:本技能是纯标准库静态扫描,不调用任何外部 SAST/DAST 工具、不发起网络请求、不对目标系统做任何改动;仅基于源码文本做启发式规则匹配。
何时使用
- PR / 合并请求提交后,作为 CI 评审门禁的一环。
- 想快速兜底硬编码密钥、SQL 拼接、超长函数等明显坏味道。
- 在
qa-unit-tdd之后,或作为发布前代码质量保障的一环。
规则
| 规则 | 反模式 | 严重度 |
| CR-HARDCODED-SECRET | 硬编码密码 / 密钥 / token | critical / blocking |
| CR-SQL-CONCAT | SQL 字符串拼接(注入风险) | high |
| CR-LONG-FUNC | 函数 / 方法过长(>阈值行) | high |
| CR-TODO-NO-TICKET | TODO/FIXME 未关联工单 | medium |
| CR-DEBUG-PRINT | 遗留调试打印(print/console.log) | low |
存在 critical(CR-HARDCODED-SECRET)→ 产出 blocking=true 信号,门禁失败。
使用方式
python qa-code-review/scripts/review_scan.py --src ./src --out signals
python qa-code-review/scripts/review_scan.py --src app.py --out signals --max-func-len 60诚实边界(重要)
- 本技能是启发式静态检查,不解析 AST、不理解数据流 / 语义,误报与漏报均可能存在。
- 它不替代
qa-security-scan(ZAP/Semgrep/Trivy)的安全深度扫描;密钥类问题建议两者并用。 - 超长函数判定基于"声明到下一声明"的行距启发式,跨语言的精确 cyclomatic 复杂度需专用工具。
参考资料
- 检查项、阈值、CLI 用法与常见坑:见
references/guide.md。
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

