review
Skill125 starsChanged 5 days agoNo licenceView on GitHub
병합 전에 diff·브랜치·PR을 리뷰할 때 사용. 렌즈별 탐색 에이전트를 병렬로 돌리고, 별도 검증 에이전트 투표로 거짓 양성을 걸러, 심각도 순으로 근거(file:line)와 함께 보고하고 위험 등급과 필요한 사람 승인 수를 정한다. Triggers - 코드 리뷰, 리뷰해 줘, PR 리뷰, review, 병합 전 점검.
Other versions193 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 2
- jh941213/ADLC-harness★ 125100% same
- jh941213/my-cc-harness★ 125100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 191
- garrytan/gstack★ 139ksame name
- ansible/ansible★ 71ksame name
- docling-project/docling★ 70ksame name
- traefik/traefik★ 65ksame name
- ClickHouse/ClickHouse★ 51ksame name
- temporalio/temporal★ 24ksame name
- tisfeng/Easydict★ 15ksame name
- juicedata/juicefs★ 15ksame name
- elie222/inbox-zero★ 13ksame name
- gitkraken/vscode-gitlens★ 10ksame name
181 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Used alongsideProjects with it also use close-spec, daily-arxiv and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
dzhngSkillclose-spec
When a spec under specs/<feature>/ is done shipping (a write-spec build, or any planned task that produced a spec), archive it to specs/done/ and rewrite it from a build-plan into a durable rationale — the why, the principles, the invariants — pointing back to the real code for the how. Use when implementation has landed and the plan no longer matches what shipped, or the user says a feature/spec is finished. Pairs with [write-spec](../write-spec/SKILL.md) (the plan this closes) and [review](../review/SKILL.md) (run before closing).
Also in 5 projects that use this
LambenthanSkilldaily-arxiv
每日从 arXiv 拉取新论文，过滤相关性，auto-ingest 高优先级论文，检测 SOTA 更新
Also in 5 projects that use this
- dzhngSkill
design-with-images
Explore UI and visual design with image generation, then iterate the real implementation against the user-selected concept. Use when brainstorming visual directions, offering mockup variants, or implementing an approved generated design; do not stop at the mockups or the first code approximation.
Also in 5 projects that use this
- LambenthanSkill
exp-eval
实验判决门：Review LLM 独立评判实验结果 → 4 种判决路径 → 自动更新 claims confidence、ideas status、graph edges
Also in 5 projects that use this
transitive-bullshitSkillcompare-screenshots
Compare screenshots against the intended design, distinguishing approved references from historical baselines. Use for iterative implementation matching, before/after visual review, objective image telemetry, or checking a lone capture for flat, empty, or badly framed content.
Also in 5 projects that use this
- +4 more from Lambenthan
- +3 more from dzhng
In this repository30 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- api-design-principlesSkill
- async-python-patternsSkill
- brainstormingSkill
- build-fixSkill
- client-docsSkill
- commit-push-prSkill
- design-mdSkill
- docs-architectureSkill
- docs-ciSkill
- docs-interfacesSkill
- docs-manualsSkill
- evalSkill
- fastapi-templatesSkill
- harness-guideSkill
- loopengSkill
- memoryboxSkill
- memorySkill
- python-testing-patternsSkill
- receiving-code-reviewSkill
- researchSkill
- scaffoldSkill
- systematic-debuggingSkill
- techdebtSkill
- test-driven-developmentSkill
- typescript-advanced-typesSkill
- vercel-react-best-practicesSkill
- verification-before-completionSkill
- writing-plansSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.