implement-task
Skill2 starsChanged 55 days agoMITView on GitHub
Implement a validated task end-to-end. Checks that analyze-task ran within the last hour, then branches, writes tests (TDD), implements, commits, lints, and commits again.
16 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- allemaar/open-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- etr/groundworktheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- rumotion/ai-agent-project-templatetheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- allanbian1017/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- berkekcay/link-shortener-agent-readytheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- juanitourquiza/shipframetheir own version, first seen Oct 23, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use handoff and code-review.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
MicrosoftSkillhandoff
Compact the current conversation into a handoff document for another agent to pick up.
Also in 3 projects that use this
GoogleSkillcode-review
Adversarial systems, concurrency, memory-model, and architecture code review protocol. Use this skill whenever asked to review code, PRs, diffs, or branches in Filament.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions16 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 16
- ModelEngine-Group/fit-framework★ 2.1ksame name
- etr/groundwork★ 45same name
- dirumahrafif/my-opencode-skills★ 37same name
- allemaar/open-skills★ 15same name
- asta-nguyen/kamehadb★ 14same name
- phatysddev/skills★ 8same name
- asta-nguyen/agent-devkit★ 4same name
- juanitourquiza/shipframe★ 4same name
- allanbian1017/skills★ 2same name
- mmaripanguec/dev-sdd-kit★ 2same name
6 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository3 other files it gives its agents.
- analyze-taskSkill
- list-tasksSkill
- prepare-for-wishesSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
19 rules. 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 13 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 14 edited versions we read keep these.
6
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
13
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 8
When this skill is loaded, you help the developer implement a validated task (user story or bug) from start to finish — branching, TDD, …
- Very specific: line 16
Read ../globals/INDEX.md and follow its instructions to load all globals.
- Very specific: line 20
Check whether a .git directory exists at the project root (<project_root>/.git — use ls or test -d).
- Very specific: line 24
Check whether <project_root>/.jenie/technical-context.md exists (use ls or test -f).
- Distinctive: line 26
If it exists: Read the file and cache its contents as the session's technical reference.
- Distinctive: line 30
Stop: Do not proceed with implementation.
- Very specific: line 36
Ask the developer which task they want to implement — a file path or a reference to a task from docs/.
- Very specific: line 42
Read <project_root>/.jenie/.validation-registry.json.
- Very specific: line 47
If the entry's status is not "consistent-doable":
- Distinctive: line 49
Ask if they want to refine the task and re-validate, or stop.
- Very specific: line 50
If the entry's status is "consistent-doable" and the timestamp is within the last hour — proceed.
- Very specific: line 54
Read ./guidelines/git.md and follow its branch naming and working tree conventions.
- Very specific: line 60
Read ./guidelines/tdd.md and follow its TDD process: extract criteria, discover test infrastructure, write tests (red phase), then …
- Very specific: line 63
Use search_graph(label="Function", name_pattern=".*test.*") to find existing test patterns
- Very specific: line 64
Use get_code_snippet() to read relevant test examples
- Very specific: line 72
Read ./guidelines/quality-check.md and run all checks — linting, type-checking, security, and manual code review.
- Distinctive: line 76
Run the tests again — confirm all are still green.
- Distinctive: line 77
If any regression was introduced, fix before proceeding.
- Very specific: line 81
Follow the quality commit conventions from the cached git guidelines (./guidelines/git.md).
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 14 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Implement Task Skill
When this skill is loaded, you help the developer implement a validated task (user story or bug) from start to finish — branching, TDD, implementation, linting, and committing.
Command syntax: jenie commands are written here as
/jenie <name>. In OpenCode use them as-is (e.g.,/jenie prepare-for-wishes); in Claude Code they are namespaced with a colon (e.g.,/jenie:prepare-for-wishes); in Copilot use the skill name directly (e.g.,/prepare-for-wishes). Always show the developer the syntax that matches the current environment.
Pre-condition
1. Load Global Guidelines
Read ../globals/INDEX.md and follow its instructions to load all globals. Cache them for the session. This must complete before any workflow step.
2. Verify repository exists
Check whether a .git directory exists at the project root (<project_root>/.git — use ls or test -d). If it does not — there is no repository and no code to modify — inform the developer and stop. Do not proceed.
3. Load technical context
Check whether <project_root>/.jenie/technical-context.md exists (use ls or test -f).
- If it exists: Read the file and cache its contents as the session's technical reference. The information within (scripts, naming conventions, project structure, workflow) should guide implementation decisions throughout all subsequent steps.
If it does not exist: This is a blocker. Tell the developer:
⚠️ Technical context not found. The file
.jenie/technical-context.mdis required for implementation (it provides project structure, scripts, naming conventions, and workflow rules). Please run/jenie prepare-for-wishesfirst to generate it.Stop. Do not proceed with implementation.
Workflow
1. Determine the task to implement
Ask the developer which task they want to implement — a file path or a reference to a task from docs/. If they're unsure, suggest using /jenie list-tasks first to browse and stop.
Once you have the task file path, read the full task file so you know its acceptance criteria and details. If the developer does not provide a task after the prompt, inform them that implementation cannot proceed without a task and stop.
2. Check validation recency
- Read
<project_root>/.jenie/.validation-registry.json. If the file does not exist or contains invalid JSON, no validation has been recorded. - Find an entry whose
pathmatches the task file path (relative to project root). - Determine the current UTC time. If no entry exists or the entry's
timestampis older than 1 hour from the current time:- Tell the developer the task needs re-validation (it was never validated or the validation expired).
- Redirect to
/jenie analyze-taskand stop.
- If the entry's
statusis not"consistent-doable":- Inform the developer the task did not pass validation (status:
<status>). - Ask if they want to refine the task and re-validate, or stop. Do not proceed with implementation.
- Inform the developer the task did not pass validation (status:
- If the entry's
statusis"consistent-doable"and the timestamp is within the last hour — proceed.
3. Create a feature branch
Read ./guidelines/git.md and follow its branch naming and working tree conventions. Cache the git conventions for later steps.
Before creating the branch, check whether a remote named origin exists (git remote get-url origin). If it does, check whether the branch exists on the remote (git ls-remote --heads origin <prefix>/<description>). If it exists, ask the developer how to proceed (reuse, rename, or delete). If no origin remote exists, skip the remote check and proceed.
4. Write test cases from acceptance criteria (TDD)
Read ./guidelines/tdd.md and follow its TDD process: extract criteria, discover test infrastructure, write tests (red phase), then implement (green phase).
If MCP available (check MCP Status in technical-context.md):
- Use
search_graph(label="Function", name_pattern=".*test.*")to find existing test patterns - Use
get_code_snippet()to read relevant test examples
5. Functional commit
Once all tests are green, follow the functional commit conventions from the cached git guidelines (./guidelines/git.md).
6. Quality check
Read ./guidelines/quality-check.md and run all checks — linting, type-checking, security, and manual code review. Fix every issue found.
7. Final verification
- Run the tests again — confirm all are still green.
- If any regression was introduced, fix before proceeding.
8. Quality commit
Follow the quality commit conventions from the cached git guidelines (./guidelines/git.md).
9. Report
Tell the developer:
- Branch name
- What was implemented (one-line summary)
- Test results (all green)
- Linting/quality results (what was checked, what was fixed)
- Commit SHAs (short form, e.g.,
a1b2c3d)
Throughout the workflow, follow the loaded global guidelines.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

