bmad-sprint-status
Skill2 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Summarize sprint status and surface risks. Use when the user says "check sprint status" or "show sprint status"
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
11 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 7 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 14 edited versions we read keep these.
4
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
7
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 39
Treat every entry in {workflow.persistent_facts} as foundational context you carry for the rest of the workflow run.
- Very specific: line 97
Run /bmad:bmm:workflows:sprint-planning to generate it, then rerun sprint-status.</output> <action>Exit workflow</action> </check> …
- Very specific: line 150
IF any story has status "review": suggest /bmad:bmm:workflows:code-review
- Distinctive: line 151
IF any story has status "in-progress" AND no stories have status "ready-for-dev": recommend staying focused on active story
- Very specific: line 152
IF all epics have status "backlog" AND no stories have status "ready-for-dev": prompt /bmad:bmm:workflows:create-story
- Very specific: line 153
IF last_updated timestamp is more than 7 days old (or last_updated is missing, fall back to generated): warn "sprint-status.yaml may be …
- Distinctive: line 154
IF any story key doesn't match an epic pattern (e.g., story "5-1-..." but no "epic-5"): warn "orphaned story detected"
- Distinctive: line 155
IF any epic has status in-progress but has no associated stories: warn "in-progress epic has no stories" </step>
- Very specific: line 161
If any story status == in-progress → recommend dev-story for the first in-progress story
- Distinctive: line 197
Run recommended workflow now
- Very specific: line 205
If the command targets a story, set story_key={{next_story_id}} when prompted.</output> </check>
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 14 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Sprint Status Workflow
Goal: Summarize sprint status, surface risks, and recommend the next workflow action.
Your Role: You are a Developer providing clear, actionable sprint visibility. No time estimates — focus on status, risks, and next steps.
Conventions
- Bare paths (e.g.
checklist.md) resolve from the skill root. {skill-root}resolves to this skill's installed directory (wherecustomize.tomllives).{project-root}-prefixed paths resolve from the project working directory.{skill-name}resolves to the skill directory's basename.
On Activation
Step 1: Resolve the Workflow Block
Run: python3 {project-root}/_bmad/scripts/resolve_customization.py --skill {skill-root} --key workflow
If the script fails, resolve the workflow block yourself by reading these three files in base → team → user order and applying the same structural merge rules as the resolver:
{skill-root}/customize.toml— defaults{project-root}/_bmad/custom/{skill-name}.toml— team overrides{project-root}/_bmad/custom/{skill-name}.user.toml— personal overrides
Any missing file is skipped. Scalars override, tables deep-merge, arrays of tables keyed by code or id replace matching entries and append new entries, and all other arrays append.
Step 2: Execute Prepend Steps
Execute each entry in {workflow.activation_steps_prepend} in order before proceeding.
Step 3: Load Persistent Facts
Treat every entry in {workflow.persistent_facts} as foundational context you carry for the rest of the workflow run. Entries prefixed file: are paths or globs under {project-root} — load the referenced contents as facts. All other entries are facts verbatim.
Step 4: Load Config
Load config from {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml and resolve:
project_name,user_namecommunication_language,document_output_languageimplementation_artifactsdateas system-generated current datetimeproject_context=**/project-context.md(load if exists)- YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT in your Agent communication style with the config
{communication_language}
Step 5: Greet the User
Greet {user_name}, speaking in {communication_language}.
Step 6: Execute Append Steps
Execute each entry in {workflow.activation_steps_append} in order.
Activation is complete. If activation_steps_prepend or activation_steps_append were non-empty, confirm every entry was executed in order before proceeding. Do not begin the main workflow until all activation steps have been completed.
Paths
sprint_status_file={implementation_artifacts}/sprint-status.yaml
Input Files
| Input | Path | Load Strategy |
| Sprint status | {sprint_status_file} | FULL_LOAD |
Execution
<workflow><step n="0" goal="Determine execution mode">
<action>Set mode = {{mode}} if provided by caller; otherwise mode = "interactive"</action> <check if="mode == data">
<action>Jump to Step 20</action>
</check> <check if="mode == validate">
<action>Jump to Step 30</action>
</check> <check if="mode == interactive">
<action>Continue to Step 1</action>
</check>
</step><step n="1" goal="Locate sprint status file">
<action>Load {project_context} for project-wide patterns and conventions (if exists)</action>
<action>Try {sprint_status_file}</action>
<check if="file not found">
<output>sprint-status.yaml not found.
Run `/bmad:bmm:workflows:sprint-planning` to generate it, then rerun sprint-status.</output>
<action>Exit workflow</action>
</check>
<action>Continue to Step 2</action>
</step><step n="2" goal="Read and parse sprint-status.yaml">
<action>Read the FULL file: {sprint_status_file}</action>
<action>Parse fields: generated, last_updated, project, project_key, tracking_system, story_location</action>
<action>Parse development_status map. Classify keys:</action>
- Epics: keys starting with "epic-" (and not ending with "-retrospective")
- Retrospectives: keys ending with "-retrospective"
- Stories: everything else (e.g., 1-2-login-form)
<action>Map legacy story status "drafted" → "ready-for-dev"</action>
<action>Count story statuses: backlog, ready-for-dev, in-progress, review, done</action>
<action>Map legacy epic status "contexted" → "in-progress"</action>
<action>Count epic statuses: backlog, in-progress, done</action>
<action>Count retrospective statuses: optional, done</action><action>Validate all statuses against known values:</action>
- Valid story statuses: backlog, ready-for-dev, in-progress, review, done, drafted (legacy)
- Valid epic statuses: backlog, in-progress, done, contexted (legacy)
Valid retrospective statuses: optional, done
<check if="any status is unrecognized"> <output>
Unknown status detected: {{#each invalid_entries}}
{{key}}: "{{status}}" (not recognized) {{/each}}
Valid statuses:
- Stories: backlog, ready-for-dev, in-progress, review, done
- Epics: backlog, in-progress, done
- Retrospectives: optional, done
</output><ask>How should these be corrected? {{#each invalid_entries}} {{@index}}. {{key}}: "{{status}}" → [select valid status] {{/each}}
Enter corrections (e.g., "1=in-progress, 2=backlog") or "skip" to continue without fixing:</ask>
<check if="user provided corrections">
<action>Update sprint-status.yaml with corrected values</action>
<action>Re-parse the file with corrected statuses</action>
</check>
</check>
<action>Detect risks:</action>
- IF any story has status "review": suggest
/bmad:bmm:workflows:code-review - IF any story has status "in-progress" AND no stories have status "ready-for-dev": recommend staying focused on active story
- IF all epics have status "backlog" AND no stories have status "ready-for-dev": prompt
/bmad:bmm:workflows:create-story - IF
last_updatedtimestamp is more than 7 days old (orlast_updatedis missing, fall back togenerated): warn "sprint-status.yaml may be stale" - IF any story key doesn't match an epic pattern (e.g., story "5-1-..." but no "epic-5"): warn "orphaned story detected"
- IF any epic has status in-progress but has no associated stories: warn "in-progress epic has no stories"
</step>
<step n="3" goal="Select next action recommendation">
<action>Pick the next recommended workflow using priority:</action>
<note>When selecting "first" story: sort by epic number, then story number (e.g., 1-1 before 1-2 before 2-1)</note>
1. If any story status == in-progress → recommend `dev-story` for the first in-progress story
2. Else if any story status == review → recommend `code-review` for the first review story
3. Else if any story status == ready-for-dev → recommend `dev-story`
4. Else if any story status == backlog → recommend `create-story`
5. Else if any retrospective status == optional → recommend `retrospective`
6. Else → All implementation items done; congratulate the user - you both did amazing work together!
<action>Store selected recommendation as: next_story_id, next_workflow_id, next_agent (DEV)</action>
</step><step n="4" goal="Display summary">
<output>
## Sprint Status- Project: {{project}} ({{project_key}})
- Tracking: {{tracking_system}}
- Status file: {sprint_status_file}
Stories: backlog {{count_backlog}}, ready-for-dev {{count_ready}}, in-progress {{count_in_progress}}, review {{count_review}}, done {{count_done}}
Epics: backlog {{epic_backlog}}, in-progress {{epic_in_progress}}, done {{epic_done}}
Next Recommendation: /bmad:bmm:workflows:{{next_workflow_id}} ({{next_story_id}})
{{#if risks}} Risks: {{#each risks}}
{{this}} {{/each}} {{/if}}
</output> </step>
<step n="5" goal="Offer actions">
<ask>Pick an option:
1) Run recommended workflow now
2) Show all stories grouped by status
3) Show raw sprint-status.yaml
4) Exit
Choice:</ask> <check if="choice == 1">
<output>Run `/bmad:bmm:workflows:{{next_workflow_id}}`.
If the command targets a story, set `story_key={{next_story_id}}` when prompted.</output>
</check> <check if="choice == 2">
<output>
### Stories by Status
- In Progress: {{stories_in_progress}}
- Review: {{stories_in_review}}
- Ready for Dev: {{stories_ready_for_dev}}
- Backlog: {{stories_backlog}}
- Done: {{stories_done}}
</output>
</check> <check if="choice == 3">
<action>Display the full contents of {sprint_status_file}</action>
</check> <check if="choice == 4">
<action>Run: `python3 {project-root}/_bmad/scripts/resolve_customization.py --skill {skill-root} --key workflow.on_complete` — if the resolved value is non-empty, follow it as the final terminal instruction before exiting.</action>
<action>Exit workflow</action>
</check>
</step><!-- ========================= --><!-- Data mode for other flows --><!-- ========================= --><step n="20" goal="Data mode output">
<action>Load and parse {sprint_status_file} same as Step 2</action>
<action>Compute recommendation same as Step 3</action>
<template-output>next_workflow_id = {{next_workflow_id}}</template-output>
<template-output>next_story_id = {{next_story_id}}</template-output>
<template-output>count_backlog = {{count_backlog}}</template-output>
<template-output>count_ready = {{count_ready}}</template-output>
<template-output>count_in_progress = {{count_in_progress}}</template-output>
<template-output>count_review = {{count_review}}</template-output>
<template-output>count_done = {{count_done}}</template-output>
<template-output>epic_backlog = {{epic_backlog}}</template-output>
<template-output>epic_in_progress = {{epic_in_progress}}</template-output>
<template-output>epic_done = {{epic_done}}</template-output>
<template-output>risks = {{risks}}</template-output>
<action>Return to caller</action>
</step><!-- ========================= --><!-- Validate mode --><!-- ========================= --><step n="30" goal="Validate sprint-status file">
<action>Check that {sprint_status_file} exists</action>
<check if="missing">
<template-output>is_valid = false</template-output>
<template-output>error = "sprint-status.yaml missing"</template-output>
<template-output>suggestion = "Run sprint-planning to create it"</template-output>
<action>Return</action>
</check><action>Read and parse {sprint_status_file}</action>
<action>Validate required metadata fields exist: generated, project, project_key, tracking_system, story_location (last_updated is optional for backward compatibility)</action>
<check if="any required field missing">
<template-output>is_valid = false</template-output>
<template-output>error = "Missing required field(s): {{missing_fields}}"</template-output>
<template-output>suggestion = "Re-run sprint-planning or add missing fields manually"</template-output>
<action>Return</action>
</check>
<action>Verify development_status section exists with at least one entry</action>
<check if="development_status missing or empty">
<template-output>is_valid = false</template-output>
<template-output>error = "development_status missing or empty"</template-output>
<template-output>suggestion = "Re-run sprint-planning or repair the file manually"</template-output>
<action>Return</action>
</check>
<action>Validate all status values against known valid statuses:</action>
- Stories: backlog, ready-for-dev, in-progress, review, done (legacy: drafted)
- Epics: backlog, in-progress, done (legacy: contexted)
- Retrospectives: optional, done
<check if="any invalid status found"><template-output>is_valid = false</template-output><template-output>error = "Invalid status values: {{invalid_entries}}"</template-output><template-output>suggestion = "Fix invalid statuses in sprint-status.yaml"</template-output><action>Return</action></check>
<template-output>is_valid = true</template-output>
<template-output>message = "sprint-status.yaml valid: metadata complete, all statuses recognized"</template-output>
<action>Run: python3 {project-root}/_bmad/scripts/resolve_customization.py --skill {skill-root} --key workflow.on_complete — if the resolved value is non-empty, follow it as the final terminal instruction before exiting.</action>
</step>
</workflow>Other versions19 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- GauravRatnawat/claude-cost-optimizer★ 0100% same
Edited · 14
- delorenj/mcp-server-trello★ 44699% same
- paulpreibisch/AgentVibes★ 15576% same
- laraxot/laravelpizza.com★ 2676% same
- DogaOztuzun/branchdeck★ 1876% same
- marlonvidal/tech-manager-os★ 1795% same
- mugsun/curdx-flow★ 499% same
- salacoste/oh-my-bmad★ 276% same
- AvishkaGihan/ventureiq★ 176% same
- ChrisBP-Dev/portfolio★ 176% same
- PaulKnauer/sonos-mcp-server★ 195% same
4 more not listed
Wrote their own version · 4
- 2233admin/opencli-Razormind★ 18same name
- MysterionRise/forgetest★ 4same name
- mannnrachman/pi-bmad★ 2same name
- snovak7/bmad-github-zoho-pipeline★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Used alongsideProjects with it also use bmad-editorial-review, bmad-review-verification-gap and 1 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
2233adminSkillbmad-editorial-review
Deprecated — forwards to bmad-review.
Also in 4 projects that use this
2233adminSkillbmad-review-verification-gap
Deprecated — forwards to bmad-review.
Also in 4 projects that use this
PaulKnauerSkillbmad-dev-auto
One iteration of an unattended development loop. Use when invoked by name.
Also in 5 projects that use this
In this repository43 other files it gives its agents.
- bmad-advanced-elicitationSkill
- bmad-agent-analystSkill
- bmad-agent-architectSkill
- bmad-agent-devSkill
- bmad-agent-pmSkill
- bmad-agent-tech-writerSkill
- bmad-agent-ux-designerSkill
- bmad-brainstormingSkill
- bmad-check-implementation-readinessSkill
- bmad-checkpoint-previewSkill
- bmad-code-reviewSkill
- bmad-correct-courseSkill
- bmad-create-architectureSkill
- bmad-create-epics-and-storiesSkill
- bmad-create-prdSkill
- bmad-create-storySkill
- bmad-customizeSkill
- bmad-dev-storySkill
- bmad-document-projectSkill
- bmad-domain-researchSkill
- bmad-editorial-review-proseSkill
- bmad-editorial-review-structureSkill
- bmad-edit-prdSkill
- bmad-generate-project-contextSkill
- bmad-helpSkill
- bmad-index-docsSkill
- bmad-investigateSkill
- bmad-market-researchSkill
- bmad-party-modeSkill
- bmad-prdSkill
- bmad-prfaqSkill
- bmad-product-briefSkill
- bmad-qa-generate-e2e-testsSkill
- bmad-quick-devSkill
- bmad-retrospectiveSkill
- bmad-review-adversarial-generalSkill
- bmad-review-edge-case-hunterSkill
- bmad-shard-docSkill
- bmad-specSkill
- bmad-sprint-planningSkill
- bmad-technical-researchSkill
- bmad-uxSkill
- bmad-validate-prdSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

