agentleFS
jeaninejiangjeaninejiang/shipping-skills/AGENTS.md

shipping-skills

AGENTS.md1 starsChanged 10 days agoMITView on GitHub

Reference material for building and shipping a mobile app on Supabase. Each file below is self-contained guidance; read the one that matches the task rather than all of them. These are written around bugs that actually shipped, so each leads with a symptom. If you are debugging something that matches a symptom in the table, read that file before continuing. Each directory may also hold references/ (read when the SKILL.md points at them) and scripts/ (run rather than read). Design…

We split this AGENTS.md into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    When a gate is named after the sentence it asserts, the wrong predicate becomes visible on sight.

    line 33

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 36,368 AGENTS.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
AGENTS.md

Agent instructions

Reference material for building and shipping a mobile app on Supabase. Each file below is self-contained guidance; read the one that matches the task rather than all of them.

These are written around bugs that actually shipped, so each leads with a symptom. If you are debugging something that matches a symptom in the table, read that file before continuing.

When to read what

ReadWhen the task involves
skills/app-flow-design/SKILL.mdPlanning onboarding or any multi-step flow; adding a screen that loads data; writing a conditional that picks between screens; a screen showing the wrong thing briefly, showing first-run prompts to returning users, or trapping someone with no way back
skills/supabase-rls-data-model/SKILL.mdCreating or changing a Supabase table; writing or debugging an RLS policy; adding an invite, pairing or join flow; a query returning nothing for one user and working for another
skills/supabase-edge-functions/SKILL.mdAnything under supabase/functions/; choosing between the anon and service-role client; secrets or Vault; wiring a Postgres trigger to a function; a function returning 200 without doing its job; a deployed function behaving like older code
skills/supabase-auth-swift/SKILL.mdSign-up, sign-in or session handling in SwiftUI; OAuth redirect schemes; what the app does on launch before it knows who the user is; intermittent 401 or cancellation errors just after launch
skills/ios-app-store-release/SKILL.mdXcode or XcodeGen project config; preparing a build for upload; anything in App Store Connect; store screenshots; TestFlight; diagnosing a rejection

Each directory may also hold references/ (read when the SKILL.md points at them) and scripts/ (run rather than read).

Two rules worth applying everywhere

Design the flow before the schema. The gates in a flow spec are the questions the backend must be able to answer. Building tables first produces predicates shaped by whatever the schema made convenient, which is the origin of the worst bug these notes describe.

Prefer a precise sentence to a convenient condition. partnership != nil and "they have actually joined someone" are not the same claim. When a gate is named after the sentence it asserts, the wrong predicate becomes visible on sight.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.