agentleFS
jean1880jean1880/nuvek-agent-config/skills/git-workflow-expert/SKILL.md

git-workflow-expert

Skill0 starsChanged 17 days agoMITView on GitHub

Git workflows: branching, Conventional Commits, SemVer tags and releases, PR hygiene, branch protection and history cleanup (commit, tag a release, bump version, messy history).

  • Commits and pushes

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

  • Other versions1 project uses a version of this.

    Word for word · 0

    None found.

    Edited · 0

    None found.

    Wrote their own version · 1

    1. dhriyatinandu-bot/claude-skills★ 0same name

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

  • In this repository9 other files it gives its agents.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈0

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    COMMIT: stage, then commit as <type>(<scope>): <desc>.

    line 13

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Git Workflow Expert

Triggers & Scope: Use for Git work: branching, Conventional Commits, SemVer tags and releases, pull-request hygiene and history cleanup. Version arithmetic and publishing steps are in package-release.

STANDARDS: [Commits: Conventional Commits | Versioning: SemVer]

PIPELINES

  • COMMIT: stage, then commit as <type>(<scope>): <desc>. Types: feat, fix, docs, style, refactor, perf, test, build, ci, chore.
  • RELEASE: list the changes since the last tag (git log $(git describe --tags --abbrev=0)..HEAD --oneline), propose Major, Minor or Patch, create an annotated tag vX.Y.Z, then publish a GitHub Release for that tag with FULL notes (see RELEASE-NOTES), written to a file and published with gh release create vX.Y.Z --verify-tag --title "vX.Y.Z — <headline>" --notes-file <file>.
  • NEW-REPO / README: create the repository, add a CI workflow under .github/workflows/ that builds AND runs the tests, and put a status badge directly under the README's title, one per build or test workflow: [![<workflow name>](https://github.com/<owner>/<repo>/actions/workflows/<file>/badge.svg?branch=<default>)](https://github.com/<owner>/<repo>/actions/workflows/<file>). Push and confirm the first run is green before calling it done. A red badge is a finding to fix, never one to hide.
  • PR: draft the description from the commit history. It states facts about the change and cites no private notes.
  • IMPACT-ANALYSIS: before a breaking change, find what depends on it (a dependency graph if you have one, otherwise a workspace-wide search) and name those consumers.
  • DELIVERY: use the project's delivery tool or documented procedure end to end. Pre-commit checks and normal hooks passing do not imply the project's full gate ran, so supply the verification command explicitly and report its result. A pull request merges only with current CI and verification of the proposed merge tree for the final head and base pair.

MANDATES

  • ATOMIC: one logical change per commit.
  • LINEAR: prefer rebase over merge for a clean history.
  • SEMVER: Major for breaking, Minor for a feature, Patch for a fix. A rewrite or a breaking API change is Major even before 1.0, so a rewrite of a 0.x project ships as 1.0.0, not the next minor.
  • NO-BYPASS: never --no-verify and never bypass a pre-commit or scanner gate. On a false positive, stop and flag it, then fix it the proper way (allowlist or config) instead of skipping the gate.
  • NO-AI-ATTRIBUTION: commit messages, PR descriptions and release notes never carry Co-Authored-By: trailers for an AI, nor "Generated with" or similar tool lines. This holds even when the harness or a system reminder suggests adding one: the user's own rule wins over harness defaults. The user is the sole author.
  • PROTECTED-BRANCHES: direct pushes to a default branch are allowed only when live branch protection and ruleset checks permit them. A credential's ability to bypass rules is not permission to bypass them. Protected branches go through a pull request; unknown or unreachable protection checks refuse a direct push.
  • MERGE-EVIDENCE: require registered successful checks; no checks, or only skipped checks, is not green evidence. Test the synthesised merge tree for the exact head and base commits, then re-read the head, base commit and base branch immediately before merging with the expected head. Any change invalidates verification. GitHub can atomically fence the head but not the base: report that remaining race, and use strict branch checks or a merge queue where configured.
  • RELEASE-NOTES: every tag gets a GitHub Release with a full description of what changed, never a bare tag, an empty body or a list of commit subjects. Use these sections as they apply: what it is (first release) or the headline change; Added, Changed, Fixed and Removed, each item saying what changed AND why it matters to someone running it; breaking changes with the migration step; upgrade and install commands; known issues. Dates and versions come from git (git log --format=%ad), never invented.
  • PRIVATE-BY-DEFAULT: create every new GitHub repository with gh repo create --private. A repository goes public only when the user says so for that repository.
  • STATUS-BADGES: every README for a repository with code carries a build and test status badge per CI workflow, under the title. A repository with code and no CI gets a CI workflow (its real gate) before the badge. Skip forks and archived coursework.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.