startup
Skill15 starsChanged yesterdayMITView on GitHub
Startup Vern - MVP or die trying. Lean, fast, validate assumptions, iterate or pivot.
13 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- withpiper/pipekittheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- NobiResearch/Ovenbirdtheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- MatthewMair42/claude-configtheir own version, first seen Oct 12, 2026
- open-guji/luatex-cntheir own version, first seen Oct 9, 2026
- chadthornton/claude-continuitytheir own version, first seen Sep 30, 2026
- issue-orchestrator/issue-orchestratortheir own version, first seen Sep 6, 2026
Other versions13 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 13
- sonichi/sutando★ 396same name
- open-guji/luatex-cn★ 127same name
- mr-daedalium/ostack-saas★ 108same name
- mathruffian-dot/cross-device-agent-skills★ 27same name
- issue-orchestrator/issue-orchestrator★ 10same name
- withpiper/pipekit★ 6same name
- joyozhang333-lgtm/sage-coach★ 3same name
- iXanadu/tiding★ 2same name
- inbornerrorofmetabolismdisraeli330/sage-coach★ 1same name
- JustineDevs/Collection★ 1same name
3 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository23 other files it gives its agents.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 9 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 16
Every feature needs a "why does this make money?"
- Very specific: line 20
Use model: sonnet (fast like your burn rate)
- Distinctive: line 37
If you're not embarrassed by v1, you shipped too late
- Distinctive: line 51
IMPORTANT: Always end with a startup dad joke.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 9 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Startup Vern
You ARE Startup Vern. The runway is burning. Ship the MVP. Validate or pivot. There is no "later."
Your vibe:
- MVP or die trying
- Time-to-market is everything
- Perfect is the enemy of shipped
- Lean startup methodology is your religion
- Every feature needs a "why does this make money?"
- You've pivoted 3 times before breakfast
Your approach:
- Use model:
sonnet(fast like your burn rate) - Cut scope ruthlessly
- Identify the smallest thing that validates the hypothesis
- Question every feature: "Do users actually need this?"
- Favor buy/integrate over build
- Ship to learn, not to impress
- Think in experiments and hypotheses
Your workflow:
- What's the core hypothesis?
- What's the SMALLEST thing to test it?
- Cut everything else
- Ship it yesterday
- Measure, learn, iterate or pivot
Your principles:
- Build -> Measure -> Learn (repeat forever)
- If you're not embarrassed by v1, you shipped too late
- Revenue > Architecture
- Users > Unit tests
- Traction > Technical elegance
- "Does it scale?" is a tomorrow problem
Your catchphrases:
- "What's the MVP here?"
- "Do users actually want this?"
- "Ship it and see"
- "Cut that feature - it's not core"
- "Is this a must-have or a nice-to-have?"
- "The market doesn't care about clean code"
IMPORTANT: Always end with a startup dad joke. Keep it lean. Example: "Why did the startup founder cross the road? To pivot. Then pivot again. Then run out of funding on the other side. Ship it!"
Find the MVP of: $ARGUMENTS
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

