agentleFS
jbobbinkjbobbink/seo-gsc-wizard/skills/weekly-report/SKILL.md

weekly-report

Skill0 starsChanged 21 days agoMITView on GitHub

Produce a weekly SEO performance digest for a Search Console property using the GSC Wizard MCP tools; compares a lag-adjusted 7-day window against the prior week, surfaces headline metrics, top query and page movers in both directions, ranking changes, trend breaks, Google algorithm update overlap, and logged site changes, then delivers a concise digest with watch items and recommendations. Use when the user asks for a weekly report, a weekly SEO update, "how did we do this week", a week-over-week summary, or a recurring performance digest for a site.

49 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use agency-clients, cross-post-video and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • posteverywhereSkill

    agency-clients

    Work safely across several clients or brands in PostEverywhere. Use when the user manages social media for more than one client, brand or business, mentions a client by name, asks to switch clients, or when the connected accounts belong to different companies.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • posteverywhereSkill

    cross-post-video

    Post one video to several platforms with PostEverywhere, with the right title and caption for each. Use when the user wants to share a video, Reel, Short or TikTok across TikTok, Instagram Reels, YouTube Shorts, LinkedIn and Facebook Reels, or asks to "post this video everywhere".

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • CodeWithSulemanSkill

    approval-workflow

    Manage human-in-the-loop approval workflows for sensitive actions like payments, emails to new contacts, social media posts, and other actions requiring human oversight.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • flintfromthebasementSkill

    write-blog-post

    Write or edit a long-form blog post in a specific author's voice, then run it through six editorial passes (substance, structure, human voice, de-AI scrub, house style + O'Reilly word list, fresh-context critic) before delivering. Handles drafting from a brief, filling an outline, editing a draft, refreshing an old post, and applying revision notes. Use when the user wants a blog post that sounds like a real person wrote it, not a one-shot generation.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • +8 more from posteverywhere

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

7 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 25 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 2

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 5

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Resolve the property: If the user (or the request) named a property, use it.

    line 12
  2. Very specific:

    Ranking movement: Call get_ranking_changes with startDate/endDate set to the current week, comparisonStartDate/comparisonEndDate set to the …

    line 23
  3. Very specific:

    Trend break check: Call detect_change_points with metric: "clicks" and days: 90.

    line 25
  4. Very specific:

    Algorithm update overlap: Call list_algo_updates with startDate about 21 days before the current week's start (rollouts span days to weeks).

    line 27
  5. Very specific:

    Logged site changes: Call list_annotations with the property's siteUrl, startDate set to the prior week's start, and endDate set to the …

    line 29
  6. Distinctive:

    If a dip is visible at the newest edge of any series, say that GSC data lags about 2 to 3 days and the most recent days may still fill in.

    line 42
  7. Distinctive:

    After delivering the digest, offer two shareable options and run one only if the user asks:

    line 46

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 25 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Weekly SEO Report

Produce a concise weekly SEO performance digest for one Search Console property, using the GSC Wizard MCP tools. The user's request may contain a property (a GSC site URL or a recognizable site name) and/or a focus hint (a market, a site section, a topic); use it to resolve the property and to slant the analysis.

Steps

  1. Resolve the property. If the user (or the request) named a property, use it. Otherwise call list_sites first. Site URLs use GSC formats: sc-domain:example.com or https://www.example.com/. If several plausible matches exist, ask the user which one before continuing.
  2. Compute the date windows. GSC data lags about 2 to 3 days, so offset the report week back by 3 days:
    • Current week: today - 9 through today - 3 (7 days inclusive).
    • Prior week: today - 16 through today - 10. Use these exact windows in every dated call so all sections line up. If the user asks for a specific range, honor it, but keep the newest 2 days out of any window and say why. When presenting results, state the actual dates covered; do not imply the digest runs through today.
  3. Headline metrics. Call get_site_summary with days: 7. This tool applies the same 3-day lag offset internally and returns a same-length prior-period comparison, so its window matches step 2. Report clicks, impressions, CTR, and average position with week-over-week change. ctr values are already percentages on a 0-100 scale; never multiply them by 100. Position: lower is better; a change toward a lower number is an improvement.
  4. Top query and page movers. query_top_queries and query_top_pages take a single date range with no comparison parameter, so call each tool twice: once with the current week's startDate/endDate and once with the prior week's (use limit: 50). Join rows by query (or page), compute click and position deltas, and keep the largest gainers and largest decliners in each dimension.
  5. Ranking movement. Call get_ranking_changes with startDate/endDate set to the current week, comparisonStartDate/comparisonEndDate set to the prior week, and dimension: "query". If step 4 showed the movement is page-driven, call it again with dimension: "page". Highlight notable entries from all four buckets: new, lost, improved, declined.
  6. Trend break check. Call detect_change_points with metric: "clicks" and days: 90. If any detected change point falls inside or within a few days before the report week, the week's move is a sustained level shift rather than noise; note the before/after averages the tool reports.
  7. Algorithm update overlap. Call list_algo_updates with startDate about 21 days before the current week's start (rollouts span days to weeks). Flag any update whose begin-to-end span overlaps the report week or the days just before it, and connect it to the movers where plausible.
  8. Logged site changes. Call list_annotations with the property's siteUrl, startDate set to the prior week's start, and endDate set to the current week's end. Correlate deploys, content changes, and other logged events with the gains and losses.

Output

Present the digest in this order, using compact markdown tables for multi-row data and prose only for interpretation:

  1. Headline: one or two sentences with the week's dates and the four core metrics week over week.
  2. What improved: top gaining queries and pages (clicks this week, last week, delta, position where relevant), plus notable new and improved entries from step 5.
  3. What declined: the mirror table for decliners, plus lost queries.
  4. Probable causes: tie declines and gains to change points, algorithm updates, and annotations. Be explicit when the cause is uncertain; do not force a narrative.
  5. Watch items: fragile positions, queries hovering near a threshold, an unconfirmed trend break, an algorithm rollout still in progress.
  6. End with a short prioritized list of 3 to 5 concrete recommendations.

If a dip is visible at the newest edge of any series, say that GSC data lags about 2 to 3 days and the most recent days may still fill in; never treat the last 2 days as complete.

Follow-up

After delivering the digest, offer two shareable options and run one only if the user asks:

  • generate_seo_report for a full styled HTML report covering the whole analysis suite.
  • create_shared_report to save the digest's key mover table as a client-portal report. Warn the user that the returned URL opens for nobody, not even them, until access is granted: creating the report is step 1 of 3, followed by create_report_client with the recipient's email and manage_report_access to grant that client the report.

Errors

If any tool call fails with an authentication or subscription error, tell the user to run /mcp to (re)authenticate, and that a GSC Wizard account with an active plan or trial plus a connected Google Search Console account is required. If the property is not found, re-run list_sites and suggest close matches rather than guessing.

Grounding

Every number you report must name the tool it came from and the date range it covers, for example "clicks 12,340 (get_site_summary, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27)". For a table, state the tool and date range once on the line above it. If you derive a figure yourself (a delta, a sum, a share), say so and name the tool outputs it was computed from. Never report a number no tool returned.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.