agentleFS
javalenciacaijavalenciacai/QASkills/.agents/skills/test-execution-manager/SKILL.md

test-execution-manager

Skill5 starsChanged 9 months agoMITView on GitHub

Manage test execution lifecycle including test suite runs, defect logging, exploratory testing, and execution reporting. Covers smoke, regression, functional, and integration testing.

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

10 rules. About 0 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈10

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use this skill when you need to:

    line 12
  2. Distinctive:

    When: After each build/deployment

    line 24
  3. Distinctive:

    Purpose: Verify existing functionality still works

    line 29
  4. Distinctive:

    When: Before each release

    line 30
  5. Distinctive:

    Purpose: Verify features work per requirements

    line 35
  6. Distinctive:

    Scope: All functional requirements

    line 37
  7. Distinctive:

    Purpose: Verify components work together

    line 41
  8. Distinctive:

    When: After module completion

    line 42
  9. Distinctive:

    P1: Must fix before release

    line 127
  10. Distinctive:

    P2: Should fix, can defer if needed

    line 128

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Test Execution Manager

Expert skill for executing tests systematically and managing the test execution lifecycle.

When to Use

Use this skill when you need to:

  • Execute test suites
  • Log defects with complete information
  • Perform exploratory testing
  • Monitor test execution progress
  • Report test results
  • Triage test failures

Test Execution Types

1. Smoke Testing

Purpose: Quick validation that critical functionality works When: After each build/deployment Scope: Core features only (15-30 minutes) Goal: Determine if further testing is viable

2. Regression Testing

Purpose: Verify existing functionality still works When: Before each release Scope: Previously working features Goal: Catch unintended side effects

3. Functional Testing

Purpose: Verify features work per requirements When: During development and QA cycles Scope: All functional requirements Goal: Validate business logic

4. Integration Testing

Purpose: Verify components work together When: After module completion Scope: Inter-system interfaces, APIs, data flow Goal: Validate system integration

5. Exploratory Testing

Purpose: Unscripted investigation to find edge cases When: Throughout testing cycle Scope: Areas prone to defects Goal: Discover unexpected behaviors

Test Execution Workflow

1. Prepare Test Environment
   - Verify environment setup
   - Load test data
   - Check system availability

2. Execute Test Suite
   - Follow test case steps exactly
   - Document actual results
   - Capture screenshots/logs for failures

3. Log Defects
   - Use defect template
   - Include reproduction steps
   - Attach evidence

4. Triage Results
   - Categorize: Pass/Fail/Blocked
   - Prioritize failures
   - Determine root cause

5. Report Status
   - Update test metrics
   - Communicate blockers
   - Provide recommendations

Defect Logging Template

Required Information:

Defect ID: BUG-XXX
Title: [Clear, specific title]
Severity: [Critical/High/Medium/Low]
Priority: [P0/P1/P2/P3]

Environment:
- OS: [Windows/Mac/Linux + version]
- Browser: [Chrome/Firefox/etc + version]
- App Version: [x.y.z]
- Test Environment: [Dev/QA/Staging]

Steps to Reproduce:
1. [Exact step]
2. [Exact step]
3. [Exact step]

Expected Result: [What should happen]
Actual Result: [What actually happened]

Attachments:
- Screenshots
- Error logs
- Network traces
- Video recording (if applicable)

Additional Info:
- Frequency: [Always/Intermittent]
- Related tickets: [Links]
- Workaround: [If any]

Severity Definitions

  • Critical: System crash, data loss, security breach
  • High: Major feature broken, no workaround
  • Medium: Feature partially broken, workaround exists
  • Low: Cosmetic issue, minor inconvenience

Priority Definitions

  • P0: Blocks release, fix immediately
  • P1: Must fix before release
  • P2: Should fix, can defer if needed
  • P3: Nice to have, can be backlogged

Test Execution Best Practices

During Execution

  • ✓ Execute tests exactly as written
  • ✓ Don't assume - verify every step
  • ✓ Capture evidence immediately
  • ✓ Note environment details
  • ✓ Report blockers immediately
  • ✓ Retest fixed defects promptly

Test Data Management

  • ✓ Use test accounts, not production
  • ✓ Reset data between test runs
  • ✓ Protect sensitive information
  • ✓ Document data dependencies

Communication

  • ✓ Daily test status updates
  • ✓ Flag risks early
  • ✓ Collaborate with developers
  • ✓ Provide clear reproduction steps

Test Execution Metrics

Track these metrics:

  • Test Pass Rate: Passed / Total executed
  • Defect Detection Rate: Defects found / Total tests
  • Test Coverage: Tests executed / Total planned
  • Execution Progress: Completed / Total
  • Blocked Tests: Tests unable to run
  • Flaky Tests: Inconsistent results

Exploratory Testing Charter Template

Mission: [What to explore]
Duration: 60-90 minutes
Areas:
- [Specific feature/flow to investigate]
- [Edge cases to try]
- [Integration points]

Notes:
- [Observations]
- [Interesting behaviors]
- [Potential defects]

Defects Found: [Count + IDs]
Coverage: [What was tested]
Risks: [Concerns identified]

Test Execution Report Template

Test Execution Summary
Date: [Date]
Sprint/Release: [Version]
Tester: [Name]

Overall Status: [On Track / At Risk / Blocked]

Test Results:
- Total Planned: XXX
- Executed: XXX
- Passed: XXX (XX%)
- Failed: XXX (XX%)
- Blocked: XXX (XX%)
- Remaining: XXX

Defects Summary:
- Critical: XX
- High: XX
- Medium: XX
- Low: XX
- Total: XX

Blockers:
1. [Description + impact]
2. [Description + impact]

Risks:
1. [Risk + mitigation]

Next Steps:
1. [Action item]
2. [Action item]

Completion Criteria

A test cycle is complete when:

  • ✓ All planned tests executed
  • ✓ Critical defects fixed and verified
  • ✓ Pass rate meets threshold (typically 95%+)
  • ✓ No blocking defects remain
  • ✓ Test evidence documented
  • ✓ Sign-off obtained from stakeholders

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.