apple-store-submit
Skill22 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Handle Apple App Store rejection emails end-to-end: parse rejection reasons, create a fix plan, implement code changes (privacy strings, entitlements, sandbox), navigate App Store Connect to update metadata, and resubmit. Use when an app receives a rejection or when preparing a first-time submission.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈5
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 39
Read the full rejection email.
- Distinctive: line 46
Create a numbered fix plan: one item per rejection point, with the type of fix needed.
- Very specific: line 82
Sandbox violations: remove NoEscapeBlock patterns, replace deprecated APIs, use only sandboxed file access via Security-Scoped Bookmarks …
- Distinctive: line 122
Privacy Nutrition Labels: must accurately reflect data collected/linked to user
- Distinctive: line 131
If a feature requires special credentials to test, provide test account details
- Distinctive: line 138
If rejected again: respond in the Resolution Center thread (same case number)
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
🤖 Auto-generated by weekly-pattern-learner · App Store rejection handling workflow observed in FocusNotch App Store session, Jun 2026 (92 user turns covering rejection → plan → code fixes → metadata → resubmit)
Apple App Store Submission & Rejection Handling
Overview
Parse Apple rejection feedback, implement targeted fixes, update App Store Connect metadata, and resubmit, covering the complete cycle from rejection email to approved build.
When to Use
- Apple review team sends a rejection email
- App fails automated pre-review checks (binary rejected at upload)
- Preparing metadata for first-time submission (screenshots, keywords, privacy labels)
- Resolving App Store Connect errors before submitting for review
Workflow
1. Parse the Rejection
Read the full rejection email. Extract and list:
- Guideline numbers violated (e.g., 2.1, 4.2.0, 5.1.1)
- Code-level issues: missing entitlements, incorrect privacy strings, sandbox violations
- Metadata issues: wrong screenshot sizes, subtitle policy, keyword stuffing
- UX issues: crashes described by reviewer, broken flows, missing functionality
Create a numbered fix plan: one item per rejection point, with the type of fix needed.
2. Classify Fixes by Type
| Type | Location |
| Privacy usage strings missing | Info.plist |
| Entitlement missing/wrong | <AppName>.entitlements |
| Crash or broken feature | Source code |
| Screenshots wrong size/content | App Store Connect |
| Keywords/subtitle/description | App Store Connect |
| Build number conflict | Xcode + App Store Connect |
3. Implement Code Fixes
Privacy permission strings (Info.plist):
<key>NSMicrophoneUsageDescription</key>
<string>Used for voice input during focus sessions.</string>
<key>NSCalendarsUsageDescription</key>
<string>Used to sync tasks with your calendar.</string>Entitlements (<AppName>.entitlements):
<key>com.apple.security.app-sandbox</key>
<true/>
<key>com.apple.security.network.client</key>
<true/>
<key>com.apple.security.files.user-selected.read-write</key>
<true/>Sandbox violations: remove NoEscapeBlock patterns, replace deprecated APIs, use only sandboxed file access via Security-Scoped Bookmarks when needed.
4. Build and Archive
# Clean build
xcodebuild clean \
-scheme <AppName> \
-destination 'generic/platform=macOS'
# Archive
xcodebuild archive \
-scheme <AppName> \
-archivePath build/<AppName>.xcarchive \
-destination 'generic/platform=macOS'
# Export for App Store
xcodebuild -exportArchive \
-archivePath build/<AppName>.xcarchive \
-exportPath build/export \
-exportOptionsPlist ExportOptions.plistValidate codesigning before upload:
codesign --verify --deep --strict --verbose=4 build/export/<AppName>.app
spctl --assess --verbose=4 build/export/<AppName>.app5. Update App Store Connect Metadata
Navigate: My Apps → [App] → App Store tab
Common metadata fixes:
- App name: max 30 chars
- Subtitle: max 30 chars, no duplicate keywords from the title field
- Keywords: 100-char total limit, comma-separated, no spaces after commas
- Screenshots: exact pixel dimensions per device type (check Apple's current spec)
- Privacy Nutrition Labels: must accurately reflect data collected/linked to user
- Build selection: select the newly uploaded build before submitting
6. Write Reviewer Notes
In the submission form, fill Notes for Reviewer:
- Explain each rejection point and what was changed
- Reference specific guideline numbers: "Addressing 2.1: added NSMicrophoneUsageDescription to Info.plist"
- If a feature requires special credentials to test, provide test account details
7. Submit and Track
- Upload via Xcode Organizer → Distribute App → App Store Connect
- In App Store Connect: select the new build, fill notes, Submit for Review
- Typical re-review: 24–48h
- If rejected again: respond in the Resolution Center thread (same case number)
- Escalate via Resolution Center for policy disagreements: do not open a new submission
Build Number Protocol
Apple rejects builds with a duplicate build number. Increment CFBundleVersion in Info.plist or Xcode target settings before every upload:
# Bump build number (e.g., 9 → 10)
xcrun agvtool new-version -all 10Verification
- Every rejection guideline number has a corresponding fix in the plan
xcodebuild archiveexits 0 with no warnings about entitlementscodesign --verifypasses- App Store Connect shows build status as "Ready to Submit"
- Reviewer Notes reference each changed item
- Build number is higher than any previously uploaded build
In this repository194 other files it gives its agents.
- 0-templateSkill
- ab-test-analyzerSkill
- academy-guideSkill
- add-to-my-skillsSkill
- adr-authorSkill
- ai-tools-setupSkill
- algorithmic-artSkill
- api-and-interface-designSkill
- api-designerSkill
- api-docs-writerSkill
- aws-cost-optimizerSkill
- bash-script-hardeningSkill
- blog-post-writerSkill
- book-summarizerSkill
- branch-cleanupSkill
- brand-copy-landingSkill
- brand-copySkill
- brand-designSkill
- brand-guidelinesSkill
- browser-testing-with-devtoolsSkill
- canvas-designSkill
- changelog-generatorSkill
- changelog-keeperSkill
- chart-chooserSkill
- ci-cd-and-automationSkill
- ci-fix-loopSkill
- claude-apiSkill
- cloudflare-block-countriesSkill
- coderabbitloopSkill
- code-review-and-qualitySkill
- code-reviewerSkill
- code-simplificationSkill
- codexloopSkill
- comms-notionSkill
- comms-slackSkill
- comms-whatsappSkill
- competitive-analysisSkill
- concept-explainerSkill
- constraint-driven-developmentSkill
- context-engineeringSkill
- context-repoSkill
- cover-letter-writerSkill
- crash-courseSkill
- cron-schedulerSkill
- data-digestSkill
- data-pipeline-architectSkill
- debug-detectiveSkill
- debugging-and-error-recoverySkill
- decision-matrixSkill
- dependabot-triageSkill
- dependency-upgraderSkill
- deprecation-and-migrationSkill
- dev-instantdbSkill
- discernment-nudgeSkill
- doc-coauthoringSkill
- dockerfile-proSkill
- docs-index-keeperSkill
- documentation-and-adrsSkill
- docxSkill
- doubt-driven-developmentSkill
- The first 60 shown.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

