agentleFS
jamestyhurstjamestyhurst/agent-skills/pair-programmer/SKILL.md

pair-programmer

Skill2 starsChanged 48 days agoMITView on GitHub

Dictate-mode pairing: instead of editing files or running commands itself, the agent narrates what to do and gives the exact text to type, one step at a time, while you type it yourself — for muscle memory, independence, and an honest record of what you actually built unaided. Use by saying "pair with me", "dictate mode", "let me type it myself", "I want to type this myself", or by invoking /pair-programmer. Works well as the default in a folder you've marked as a learning/practice project.

3 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

  • Other versions3 projects use a version of this.

    Word for word · 0

    None found.

    Edited · 0

    None found.

    Wrote their own version · 3

    1. video-db/pair-programmer★ 129same name
    2. lebobo88/pair-programmer★ 8same name
    3. GarphenGate/moltline-oss★ 0same name

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

  • In this repository3 other files it gives its agents.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 3

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Default in a marked project: if you keep a convention for tagging a repo or folder as "learning" / "practice" (a frontmatter field, a …

    line 29
  2. Distinctive:

    Not a stricter or looser code-review bar — same standards either way.

    line 64
  3. Distinctive:

    Not silence on a bad approach — the agent still says when something's wrong.

    line 65
  4. Very specific:

    Not a teaching/note-writing skill — pair with whatever your own concept-note or learning-log system is (see the companion wrap skill in …

    line 67

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Pair-Programmer

Narrate and dictate; you execute. The quality bar doesn't change — only who types does.

Why

Most agent defaults optimize for the task getting done. This skill optimizes for a different goal: you get better at doing it yourself. Typing dictated code, hitting your own errors, and fixing them from a hint rather than a diff builds a kind of fluency that watching a diff land never does.

Trigger

  • Manual, any time: "pair with me" / "dictate mode" / "let me type it myself" / "I want to type this myself" / /pair-programmer.
  • Default in a marked project: if you keep a convention for tagging a repo or folder as "learning" / "practice" (a frontmatter field, a README note, whatever you already use), have the agent treat that tag as an automatic trigger for this mode. This skill doesn't invent that tagging system for you — it just says how to react to it if you have one.
  • Exit: "stop pairing" / "just do it" / "autopilot", or the task naturally ends.

The loop

for step in task.steps:
    explain(what_and_why)          # one or two sentences
    dictate(exact_text_to_type)    # fenced code block, copy-typeable, ONE step
    wait_for(you_report_done_or_result_or_error)
    if error:
        diagnose(error)            # reading files/output to figure out the fix is fine
        # continue: dictate the fix as the next step

Rules

  • No file edits on the task's own files. Reading them to figure out what to dictate is fine — that's the agent's prep, not doing the work.
  • No running the task's own commands. A read-only check after you report a step done — a test run, git status, git diff — is verification, not driving, and stays allowed.
  • One step per turn. Small enough that a wrong keystroke is easy to catch before the next step compounds it. Never a five-step wall of instructions at once.
  • Dictate the literal text, not a description of it. "Add a type hint" is not dictation; def foo(x: int) -> str: is.
  • A single named exception doesn't end the mode. "Just add that import for me" — do that one thing, then resume dictating. Don't quietly fall back to doing everything.

What this isn't

  • Not a stricter or looser code-review bar — same standards either way.
  • Not silence on a bad approach — the agent still says when something's wrong; it just doesn't fix it by editing.
  • Not a teaching/note-writing skill — pair with whatever your own concept-note or learning-log system is (see the companion wrap skill in this repo for one shape of that) rather than expecting this skill to write one itself.

Adopting this

Copy SKILL.md into your agent's skills directory (Claude Code: ~/.claude/skills/pair- programmer/; project-scoped: .claude/skills/pair-programmer/). For agents that read a plain instructions file instead of a skills directory (Warp, Copilot via AGENTS.md, etc.), paste the Trigger, The loop, and Rules sections above into that file directly — the mechanism has no Claude-specific dependency.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.