brainstorm
Skill1 starsChanged 13 days agoMITView on GitHub
Diverge on ideas for a project or feature, then capture them as atomic, grouped, Obsidian-compatible notes in .idea/. Use when the user wants to brainstorm, explore options, think through a problem space, generate ideas, or asks "what could we build", "what are our options", "help me think about X". Also use before shaping a spec when .idea/notes is thin or empty.
189 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- nielsmadan/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- phuthuycoding/kanban-flowtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- baethon/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- CloudChef/atlasclaw-providerstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- nisarth/claude-skills-storetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- LongJohnSilver1504/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use playtest-report, team-polish and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
CoralGameSkillplaytest-report
Generates a structured playtest report template or analyzes existing playtest notes into a structured format. Use this to standardize playtest feedback collection and analysis.
Also in 9 projects that use this
CoralGameSkillteam-polish
Orchestrate the polish team: coordinates performance-analyst, technical-artist, sound-designer, and qa-tester to optimize, polish, and harden a feature or area for release quality.
Also in 11 projects that use this
lilangMaxSkillsoak-test
Generate a soak test protocol for extended play sessions. Defines what to observe, measure, and log during long play sessions to surface slow leaks, fatigue effects, and edge cases that only appear after sustained play. Primarily used in Polish and Release phases.
Also in 6 projects that use this
lilangMaxSkillteam-live-ops
Orchestrate the live-ops team for post-launch content planning: coordinates live-ops-designer, economy-designer, analytics-engineer, community-manager, writer, and narrative-director to design and plan a season, event, or live content update.
Also in 6 projects that use this
- +8 more from CoralGame
Other versions189 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 189
- Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios★ 27ksame name
- codeaholicguy/ai-devkit★ 1.7ksame name
- jtydhr88/ComfyTV★ 1.2ksame name
- event-driven-io/emmett★ 562same name
- zaxbysauce/opencode-swarm★ 519same name
- ZaxbyHub/opencode-swarm★ 518same name
- automagik-dev/genie★ 351same name
- namastexlabs/automagik-genie★ 351same name
- bkywksj/knowledge-base★ 340same name
- pixel-cellar/Claude-Code-Game-Studios★ 324same name
179 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 156 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 22
Read SPECS.md and ROADMAP.md if present.
- Distinctive: line 24
If the repo has code, skim README, the package manifest, and the main entry points.
- Distinctive: line 45
Every axis in the reference gets at least one idea, including the ones that are uncomfortable: the contrarian, the 10x-simpler, the …
- Very specific: line 49
Never suppress an idea for being hard.
- Distinctive: line 64
Ask for reactions and keep iterating as long as the user wants.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 156 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Brainstorm
Generate ideas that are actually worth having, then leave behind a vault that shape can turn into
a plan. Read .claude/skills/shared/vault-contract.md before writing anything to .idea/.
Plain language. Everything you say to the person — questions, plans, summaries, reports —
follows .claude/skills/shared/plain-language.md: assume they are not a developer, use simple
words, recommend an option when you ask, and explain any technical word the first time it appears.
Notes in .idea/ may stay technical; explain them, don't paste them.
Phase 1 — Ground yourself
ls -R .idea/ 2>/dev/null. If it exists: readINDEX.md, everythemes/*.md, and anynotes/*.mdwhose title touches the topic. Do not re-propose an idea already in the vault — build on it, sharpen it, or argue against it, and say which note you are extending.- Read
SPECS.mdandROADMAP.mdif present. Ideas that contradict a committed phase are still welcome, but you must flag the contradiction explicitly. - If the repo has code, skim README, the package manifest, and the main entry points. Ideas ungrounded in what exists are cheap and mostly useless.
Phase 2 — Predict the intent before generating
This is the step that makes the rest accurate. Before any ideas, state in 4 short bullets:
- The real goal — what the user is actually trying to achieve, beneath the literal ask.
- Success in 6 months — what would have to be true for this to have been worth doing.
- The constraint that binds — time, money, skill, distribution, or an existing commitment.
- What this is probably not — the adjacent thing you are deliberately not going to explore.
Then say: "Correct me on any of these and I'll re-aim." Do not wait for a reply — proceed on your
stated reading, and revise if corrected. Record these as the Intent ledger in the session note;
shape reads it to write the SPECS rationale.
Phase 3 — Diverge
Load references/divergence.md and work through the axes there. Non-negotiables:
- 8-12 distinct ideas before evaluating any of them. Quantity first, judgment later.
- Every axis in the reference gets at least one idea, including the ones that are uncomfortable: the contrarian, the 10x-simpler, the premise-questioning, and the horizon bet — what becomes possible or obsolete in 12-24 months as costs, models, and platforms shift.
- One line of pitch plus one line of why-it-might-work, each. No essays at this stage.
- Never suppress an idea for being hard. Mark it
#stretchand keep it.
Phase 4 — Group, break down, converge
- Cluster the ideas into 3-6 themes by the problem they solve, not by technology. A theme with one member is a signal you mis-clustered or found a genuine outlier — say which.
- Break down anything that is really a container: if an idea implies three separable pieces of work, it is a theme, and its pieces are the notes.
- Score each idea
impact/effort/confidence1-5 and assign ahorizon. The numbers are a sort order and a conversation starter, not a verdict — state your reasoning in one line. - Recommend the 2-3 strongest with actual reasoning, name the riskiest assumption in each, and list the open questions.
Phase 5 — Discuss
Ask for reactions and keep iterating as long as the user wants. Ideas the user contributes are captured the same way and attributed to them in the session note. New ideas mid-conversation go through Phase 4 too — do not let late ideas skip grouping and scoring.
Phase 6 — Capture
Checkpoint after every round; do not save only at the end of a long session.
Write, per references/note-templates.md:
.idea/notes/<Idea>.md— one per idea, atomic, scored, linked to its theme..idea/themes/<Theme>.md— the grouping layer, with the theme's thesis and its member notes..idea/sessions/<YYYY-MM-DD> Brainstorm - <Topic>.md— intent ledger, every idea produced as wikilinks, decisions reached, and next steps as- [ ]tasks..idea/INDEX.md— regenerated, never appended to.
Get the date from date +%Y-%m-%d.
Handoff
Close by telling the user what changed on disk, then: "Run /shape when you want these turned into
a spec and a phased roadmap." If 5+ notes now sit at status: promising, say so — that is the
signal that shaping is worth doing.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

