agentleFS
jamesblackwelljamesblackwell/falcondeck/.agents/skills/systematic-debugging/SKILL.md

systematic-debugging

Skill7 starsChanged 16 days agoMITView on GitHub

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

190 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use chinese-code-review, chinese-commit-conventions and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • Leodorareluctant259Skill

    chinese-code-review

    中文代码审查规范——在保持专业严谨的同时,用符合国内团队文化的方式给出有效反馈

    Also in 8 projects that use this

  • Leodorareluctant259Skill

    chinese-commit-conventions

    中文 Git 提交规范 — 适配国内团队的 commit message 规范和 changelog 自动化

    Also in 8 projects that use this

  • obraSkill

    diagnosing-superpowers

    Use when a superpowers session went wrong and your human partner wants to know why — repeated work, ignored plans, stumbles, poor results, a skill that didn't fire, "it took too long", "why is it so expensive", "what is it doing" — or wants to build a bug report for the superpowers maintainers, for the current session or a past one identified by id or path, on any harness.

    Also in 20 projects that use this

  • mjunaidcaSkill

    building-chatgpt-apps

    Guides creation of ChatGPT Apps with interactive widgets using OpenAI Apps SDK and MCP servers. Use when building ChatGPT custom apps with visual UI components, embedded widgets, or rich interactive experiences. Covers widget architecture, MCP server setup with FastMCP, response metadata, and Developer Mode configuration. NOT when building standard MCP servers without widgets (use building-mcp-servers skill instead).

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • mjunaidcaSkill

    building-chat-interfaces

    Build AI chat interfaces with custom backends, authentication, and context injection. Use when integrating chat UI with AI agents, adding auth to chat, injecting user/page context, or implementing httpOnly cookie proxies. Covers ChatKitServer, useChatKit, and MCP auth patterns. NOT when building simple chatbots without persistence or custom agent integration.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • +2 more from Leodorareluctant259
  • +5 more from mjunaidca

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

13 rules. 0 are common, 13 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 177 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 13

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    No fixes without root cause evidence first.

    line 12
  2. Distinctive:

    Use this skill for test failures, production bugs, build failures, performance problems, integration issues, and any behavior you cannot …

    line 14
  3. Distinctive:

    Read the error carefully.

    line 18
  4. Distinctive:

    Do not skip warnings that appear near the failure.

    line 20
  5. Distinctive:

    If it is flaky, collect more data before guessing.

    line 23
  6. Distinctive:

    Write the root cause as: "I think X fails because Y."

    line 34
  7. Distinctive:

    Test one variable at a time.

    line 35
  8. Distinctive:

    Add the smallest proof.

    line 36
  9. Distinctive:

    Prefer a failing test, focused repro command, log probe, or trace query.

    line 37
  10. Distinctive:

    Verify the original repro and a scoped regression check.

    line 40
  11. Distinctive:

    Stop and return to investigation if you catch yourself:

    line 44
  12. Distinctive:

    If three fix attempts fail, question the architecture before attempting a fourth.

    line 52
  13. Distinctive:

    Use these only when the current evidence calls for them:

    line 56

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 177 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Systematic Debugging

Find the root cause before changing code. Do not patch symptoms.

Core Rule

No fixes without root cause evidence first.

Use this skill for test failures, production bugs, build failures, performance problems, integration issues, and any behavior you cannot explain.

Workflow

  1. Read the error carefully.
    • Capture the exact message, stack trace, file, line, route, status, or failing assertion.
    • Do not skip warnings that appear near the failure.
  2. Reproduce the issue.
    • Record exact steps or the exact command.
    • If it is flaky, collect more data before guessing.
  3. Check recent changes.
    • Review the diff, recent commits, config changes, dependency changes, and environment differences.
  4. Trace the failing data or control flow.
    • Find where the bad value, state, request, or assumption first appears.
    • In multi-component systems, add temporary diagnostics at each boundary.
    • For deep call stacks, read references/root-cause-tracing.md.
  5. Compare with a working pattern.
    • Find similar working code in the repo.
    • List the meaningful differences before editing.
  6. State one hypothesis.
    • Write the root cause as: "I think X fails because Y."
    • Test one variable at a time.
  7. Add the smallest proof.
    • Prefer a failing test, focused repro command, log probe, or trace query.
  8. Fix the source.
    • Make the smallest change that addresses the root cause.
    • Verify the original repro and a scoped regression check.

Stop Conditions

Stop and return to investigation if you catch yourself:

  • trying a quick fix before tracing the cause
  • bundling multiple unrelated changes
  • explaining behavior without evidence
  • adapting a pattern you have not read
  • saying "probably" when a command, log, or test could verify it

If three fix attempts fail, question the architecture before attempting a fourth. Surface what each failed attempt proved and ask whether the underlying pattern is wrong.

Related Skills

Use these only when the current evidence calls for them:

  • sentry: when production exceptions, stack traces, releases, or event fingerprints are part of the failure.
  • grafana-observability: when the bug depends on API, queue, generation, LLM, deploy, trace, metric, or infrastructure behavior.
  • db-query: when the hypothesis depends on production database state and a read-only replica query is appropriate.
  • local-api-testing: when a Laravel endpoint, job, database fixture, or API contract needs a local repro.
  • automated-qa-testing: when the bug is only visible through browser UI, navigation, auth/session state, or rendered interaction.

References

  • references/full-process.md: expanded debugging process and red flags.
  • references/root-cause-tracing.md: backward tracing through call stacks and data flow.
  • references/defense-in-depth.md: validation after the source cause is known.
  • references/condition-based-waiting.md: replace arbitrary sleeps with condition polling.
  • scripts/find-polluter.sh: helper for isolating test pollution.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.