review-test-analysis
Skill17 starsChanged 6 months agoNo licenceView on GitHub
Review Japanese Markdown test analysis artifacts and questionnaires against a test plan, product specifications, and QA analysis quality criteria. Use when Codex needs to assess or improve テスト分析, including both missing viewpoints and whether the viewpoints are necessary and sufficient for the product risks, prioritize findings, fix P0/P1/P2 fix-worthy issues in the analysis artifacts, re-review until no P0/P1/P2 fix-worthy issues remain, and save the final review result as Markdown.
In this repository17 other files it gives its agents.
- create-playwright-e2e-testsSkill
- create-test-analysisSkill
- create-test-casesSkill
- create-test-codeSkill
- create-test-designSkill
- create-test-planSkill
- create-test-reportSkill
- execute-codebase-testsSkill
- execute-playwright-e2e-testsSkill
- review-playwright-e2e-testsSkill
- review-test-artifactsSkill
- review-test-casesSkill
- review-test-codeSkill
- review-test-designSkill
- review-test-planSkill
- review-test-reportSkill
- run-test-processSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
33 rules. About 0 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 23 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈10
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
23
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
No licence file, so all rights are reserved — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.