pre-call-plan
Skill0 starsChanged 12 days agoMITView on GitHub
Builds a shared pre-call plan for an account executive and sales engineer before a first enterprise software meeting, separating what they know from what they assume and assigning who asks each question. Use when preparing a first customer meeting or discovery call, or when reviewing such a plan before or after the meeting.
In this repository5 other files it gives its agents.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 20
Put these at the top of the plan.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Pre-call plan
A pre-call plan sets out what the account executive and sales engineer need to establish in their first customer meeting. Work backwards from what the meeting needs to establish, and agree that before deciding what to show.
Ask for these inputs
- The customer, who asked for the meeting and what the request said.
- Who will attend from the customer and from the selling team.
- What the account executive already knows from earlier contact: outcomes, infrastructure and challenges uncovered so far.
- Public material the team has read, such as the customer's annual report or financial statements, which can help identify the goals behind a purchase.
- Any example or demo the team is thinking of showing.
Step 1: Set the meeting outcomes
Put these at the top of the plan. A first meeting should leave the team with:
- the problem in the customer's words,
- a possible champion to investigate,
- an agreed next step.
A demo booking alone does not tell you which business problem matters or who would help pursue a change.
Step 2: Fill three rows
The rows follow the three puzzles in every deal:
- Technical: does the product fit this customer's needs and environment, and where does it differ from the alternatives? The sales engineer leads this row.
- Business value: what is the change worth to their business, and which outcomes would the economic buyer commit to?
- Qualification: who decides, how and by when, and who inside the customer carries the deal?
The sales engineer shares the business value and qualification rows with the account executive. Agree who leads each shared row for this meeting.
For each row, write:
- what you know, and where it comes from,
- what you assume,
- a question that could confirm or change each assumption,
- who will ask it.
Keep evidence and assumptions in separate columns. In the business value row, make sure the sales engineer asks what the technical problem costs the customer today, or what it holds up. Without that question, the meeting can collect requirements and leave the business consequence vague. The sales engineer needs the account executive's prior knowledge to prepare it.
Step 3: Decide what to show, and under what condition
Prepare one short example. Write in the plan which customer problem would make it useful. Decide whether to show it only after hearing the customer's problem. If the conversation goes another way, keep asking questions. Ask about the business before showing the product, then explain and demonstrate the parts that answer what you heard. If a relevant demonstration needs more preparation, propose a separate session.
Output template
Meeting outcomes: problem in their words / possible champion / agreed next step. What to show: one example, and the condition for showing it.
| Puzzle and lead | What we know, and from where | What we assume | Questions to test the assumptions, and who asks |
| Technical, led by the sales engineer | |||
| Business value, led by ... | |||
| Qualification, led by ... |
Example, for an invented insurer asking about software that reads and routes incoming documents:
| Puzzle and lead | Know (source) | Assume | Question (who) |
| Technical (SE) | Meeting request names their email platform and an in-house claims system | Claim documents arrive as attachments and scans and are keyed in by hand | SE: "Walk us through what happens to a claim document from the moment it arrives until someone can act on it." |
| Business value (AE with SE) | Annual report sets a target to lower claims handling cost | Manual keying is part of that cost; the head of claims carries the target | AE: "Where does the cost target land in your team, and what happens if it is missed?" SE: "How much time goes into keying today, and how do you measure it?" |
| Qualification (AE with SE) | She asked for the meeting and invited the architect | She would carry a change internally; the decision sits above her | AE: "If this is worth pursuing, who would take it forward internally? Who else would need to agree, and how did the last such decision go?" |
Review before the meeting
Check that each row has a lead, that each assumption has a question and someone responsible for asking it, and that the condition for showing an example is written down. Tom Mills's pre-call template suggests an internal alignment call with both sellers, which is a good place to run this review.
Review after the meeting
Beside each assumption, write what the customer said: confirmed, changed or still open. The plan for the next meeting starts from what is still open. Both sellers leave with their next steps.
Checks
- An assumption with no question, or a question with no owner, is a gap.
- A row with no source column filled is all assumption.
- A plan whose main outcome is "book a demo" has skipped the problem and the champion.
- A business value row with no cost or consequence question can collect requirements and leave the business consequence vague.
A browser version of the same plan, for people without an agent: Pre-call plan template.
Based on: Pre-call planning for a first enterprise software meeting
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

