gh-oss-release
Skill15 starsChanged 9 days agoMITView on GitHub
Create GitHub releases across multiple OSS repositories. Checks release status via `gh oss-watch releases`, analyzes unreleased commits to recommend semver bumps, confirms with user, then creates releases. Triggers: "create releases", "release my packages", "check for releases", "oss releases", "gh oss-watch releases", "/oss-release", "release status", "bump versions"
- Commits and pushes
In this repository31 other files it gives its agents.
- claude-permissions-auditSkill
- claude-skill-orchestration-auditSkill
- claude-skill-prereq-auditSkill
- claude-skill-spec-auditSkill
- dev-cli-consistency-auditSkill
- dev-code-qualitySkill
- dev-new-toolSkill
- dev-software-designSkill
- gh-dep-pr-triageSkill
- gh-issue-reportSkill
- gh-org-chartSkill
- gh-oss-go-bumpSkill
- gh-oss-release-prepSkill
- gh-review-triageSkill
- git-conventional-commitSkill
- gws-meeting-schedulerSkill
- p-activity-digestSkill
- p-blog-post-miningSkill
- p-blog-writerSkill
- p-clipboard-copySkill
- p-daily-reflectionSkill
- p-daily-reportSkill
- p-daily-standupSkill
- p-ego-searchSkill
- p-md-to-slidesSkill
- p-meeting-prepSkill
- p-news-briefingSkill
- project-namerSkill
- p-slack-triageSkill
- p-violentmonkey-userscript-syncSkill
- restaurant-searchSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
13 rules. About 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈9
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 29
Run gh oss-watch releases to identify repos with unreleased commits.
- Distinctive: line 31
If all repos are up to date, report that and stop.
- Very specific: line 51
If ALL commits are deps/ci/chore, recommend patch.
- Distinctive: line 63
Use AskUserQuestion or wait for explicit user confirmation before proceeding.
- Distinctive: line 67
After confirmation, create releases in parallel:
- Very specific: line 75
Run gh oss-watch releases again to confirm all repos show "up to date".
- Distinctive: line 79
Before updating the homebrew tap, all tag-triggered CI builds must complete successfully so release artifacts exist for formula updates.
- Distinctive: line 81
Check the most recent run for each released repo in parallel:
- Very specific: line 87
If any run is still in_progress or queued, wait for it to complete:
- Distinctive: line 93
If any build fails, stop and surface the failure to the user — do not proceed to the tap update.
- Distinctive: line 97
Ask the user if they want to update the homebrew tap before proceeding.
- Distinctive: line 99
After confirmation, trigger the scheduled workflow which handles formula updates automatically:
- Distinctive: line 110
Never force: Always confirm with user before creating any releases.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
OSS Release
Batch release workflow for multiple OSS repositories using gh oss-watch releases.
Workflow
Step 1: Check Release Status
Run gh oss-watch releases to identify repos with unreleased commits.
If all repos are up to date, report that and stop.
Step 2: Analyze Unreleased Commits
For each repo needing a release, fetch commit messages since the last tag in parallel:
gh api repos/<owner>/<repo>/compare/<last-tag>...HEAD --jq '[.commits[] | .commit.message | split("\n")[0]] | .[]'Step 3: Recommend Semver Bump
Classify each commit's first line and recommend the highest applicable bump:
| Commit pattern | Bump |
deps:, deps-dev:, ci:, chore:, maintenance-only | patch |
feat:, new functionality, non-breaking additions | minor |
BREAKING CHANGE, !: suffix, API removals | major |
If ALL commits are deps/ci/chore, recommend patch. If any commit adds a feature, recommend minor. If any commit has breaking changes, recommend major.
Step 4: Present Recommendations
Present a table for user confirmation:
| Repo | Current | Recommended | Commits | Rationale |
|------|---------|-------------|---------|-----------|
| repo-name | v1.2.3 | v1.2.4 | 5 | All dependency bumps |Use AskUserQuestion or wait for explicit user confirmation before proceeding.
Step 5: Create Releases
After confirmation, create releases in parallel:
gh release create <new-tag> --repo <owner>/<repo> --generate-notesStep 6: Verify
Run gh oss-watch releases again to confirm all repos show "up to date".
Step 7: Wait for Release Builds
Before updating the homebrew tap, all tag-triggered CI builds must complete successfully so release artifacts exist for formula updates.
Check the most recent run for each released repo in parallel:
gh run list --repo <owner>/<repo> --limit 3If any run is still in_progress or queued, wait for it to complete:
gh run watch <run-id> --repo <owner>/<repo> --exit-statusIf any build fails, stop and surface the failure to the user — do not proceed to the tap update.
Step 8: Update Homebrew Tap
Ask the user if they want to update the homebrew tap before proceeding. If they decline, stop here.
After confirmation, trigger the scheduled workflow which handles formula updates automatically:
gh workflow run scheduled.yml --repo jackchuka/homebrew-tapImportant Notes
- Tag-triggered CI: Most repos have CI that triggers on tag push (goreleaser, gh-extension-precompile, npm publish). The
gh release createcommand creates the tag which triggers the CI build. - npm packages with tag-triggered workflows: These repos derive version from the git tag during CI — no package.json bump needed.
- Parallel execution: Fetch commits and create releases in parallel across repos for speed.
- Never force: Always confirm with user before creating any releases.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

