agentleFS
jaaklajaakla/openmapstack/skills/reproducible-gis-project/SKILL.md

reproducible-gis-project

Skill76 starsChanged 45 days agoMITView on GitHub

Compile, validate or maintain a reproducible GIS project from an existing analysis or chosen workflow: project.yaml, canonical pipeline, pinned sources, executable corrections, validation, reruns and QGIS/web presentation. Use when delivery and reproducibility are the task. Route unresolved source/compute/storage architecture to open-map-stack; a bounded SQL review or dataset lookup does not need a project.

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    When the user has dlt, Dagster, dbt, QGIS or Observable in their stack, read references/established-stack.md for ownership and integration …

    line 16
  2. Very specific:

    Read references/project-workflow.md for mandatory workflow and delivery requirements and references/project-spec.md for the project …

    line 23
  3. Distinctive:

    Keep GIS correctness and the task boundaries above when using a companion.

    line 83

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Reproducible GIS project

Turn the analysis into an inspectable project another analyst can execute without the conversation. Retain the user's chosen algorithm and stack unless they cannot meet a stated requirement; explain consequential changes before making them. Do not silently substitute a convenient proxy for the requested measurement.

When the user has dlt, Dagster, dbt, QGIS or Observable in their stack, read references/established-stack.md for ownership and integration boundaries. Preserve their chosen tools; retain source pins, GIS correctness and reproducible evidence. Do not duplicate their SQL, ingestion or scheduler definitions.

Compile or update the project

Read references/project-workflow.md for mandatory workflow and delivery requirements and references/project-spec.md for the project contract. Use the local templates/ and examples/tartu-development/ as structural examples, not as evidence about the user's data. references/installation.md explains CLI setup and the worked example's runtime requirements.

  1. Establish the analysis objective, authoritative inputs, semantic filters, metric CRS, algorithm, outputs and consequential unresolved assumptions. Inspect an existing project before changing its structure. If architecture is still undecided, use an installed open-map-stack or resolve those decisions with the user before presenting the project as complete.
  2. Pin immutable sources and represent corrections/scenarios as explicit data with provenance. Verify each correction's target and prior value before applying it. Never fabricate missing authoritative geometry or overwrite a source to make validation pass.
  3. Declare one canonical executable pipeline and ordered, resolvable steps. Record delivery.schema: openmapstack-delivery/v1 for new projects; use the built-in dashboard by default, or the user's explicit external-only/combined selection. QGIS and Observable are optional targets. Existing manifests without delivery retain legacy v1 behavior until explicitly migrated. Derive selected views from that pipeline and manifest; avoid independent presentation logic that silently changes the analysis.
  4. Execute relevant checks, retain machine-readable results and run evidence, and perform a clean rerun. Check whether the openmapstack CLI is installed (openmapstack --version or python3 -m openmapstack --version, then use whichever form works for every command); if it is, run openmapstack validate, then openmapstack verify project.yaml --rerun for the clean rerun. Make that verify --rerun your last step and do not deliver until it passes; a passing validate alone is not enough. The canonical pipeline must produce every file under data/derived, every selected deliverable, the run record, and the manifest's runs.latest and project.status, never a one-off script or a hand edit: a rerun writes a new run record, so a hand-patched pointer breaks it. Missing tools or unknown data semantics remain visible limitations. A stated intention to validate is not validation.
  5. Generate the findings artifact from pipeline results before output hashing. Declare the real author and toolkit, and render linked credits with the canonical run time in every delivered view (workflow credits requirement). Review the required attribution prose too; field checks cannot certify its meaning. Deliver the project, source/override policy, runtime instructions and substantive method limitations together. Preserve the full presentation obligations for the selected targets in the workflow reference; a view alone is not the project.

Focused supporting guidance

  • CRS, formats and metric correctness: references/formats-and-crs.md.
  • User warehouses and reproducible snapshots: references/user-data-sources.md.
  • Authoritative public inputs and catalog completeness: references/data-sources.md.
  • Validation and operational evidence: references/validation-and-ops.md.
  • QGIS delivery and runtime behavior: references/qgis.md.
  • Web basemap selection, global fallback and light/dark styles: references/web-delivery.md.
  • Dashboards, reports and their checked interaction hooks: references/design-language.md.

An installed geospatial-data-discovery or spatial-sql may help with a bounded source or query question. Their absence does not prevent this skill from using its own references. Keep ownership of the compiled project and cross-stage correctness; do not require or automatically install sibling skills.

For optional product expertise, read references/companion-skills.md. Keep GIS correctness and the task boundaries above when using a companion.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.