verification
Skill1 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
This skill should be used before claiming any work is complete, before committing, before creating PRs, or before reporting task status. Enforces fresh verification evidence for all completion claims in WordPress/PHP projects. Provides the verification gate methodology: run commands, read output, then report.
47 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- neuraforge-cl-es/adaptive-engineeringtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- facebook/docusaurustheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- maideps/ai-harness-frameworktheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Lanqiao-Luca/ai-java-workflowtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Beskars-Code/Skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- Gabriel-Lafrance/Skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use evidence-driven-writing, experiment-results-planning and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
Norman-burySkillevidence-driven-writing
Use when writing or revising Introduction, Related Work, background, literature synthesis, or any section where references must drive claims
Also in 3 projects that use this
Norman-burySkillexperiment-results-planning
Use when designing experiments, result tables, mock planning data, evaluation protocols, or results sections before real data are final
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +10 more from Norman-bury
Other versions47 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- iwritec0de/app-dev★ 379% same
Wrote their own version · 46
- facebook/docusaurus★ 67ksame name
- open-metadata/OpenMetadata★ 16ksame name
- openai/plugins★ 7.8ksame name
- hi-godot/godot-ai★ 3.4ksame name
- Norman-bury/research-writing-skill★ 3.4ksame name
- Norman-bury/articlewriting-skill★ 3.4ksame name
- forcedotcom/salesforcedx-vscode★ 1ksame name
- vercel/vercel-plugin★ 328same name
- s3s-project/s3s★ 315same name
- project-numina/numina-lean-agent★ 279same name
36 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository13 other files it gives its agents.
- gutenberg-layoutSkill
- php-cleanupSkill
- woocommerceSkill
- wordpress-databaseSkill
- wordpress-engineerSkill
- wordpress-i18nSkill
- wordpress-patternsSkill
- wordpress-performanceSkill
- wordpress-securitySkill
- wordpress-standardsSkill
- wp-debuggingSkill
- wp-hooksSkill
- wp-testingSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 39 edited versions we read keep these.
4
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 21
NO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE: If you have not run the verification command in the current session, you cannot …
- Distinctive: line 25
Every completion claim must pass through this gate:
- Distinctive: line 35
Before claiming work is complete in this project, run each applicable command and confirm clean output:
- Very specific: line 45
Run these in order. A syntax error caught by php -l is cheaper to fix than one discovered by PHPUnit.
- Distinctive: line 60
If you catch yourself using these phrases, stop and run the actual command.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 39 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Verification Skill
Evidence before claims, always. NO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION.
Iron Law
NO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE. If you have not run the verification command in the current session, you cannot claim it passes. Prior knowledge, assumptions, and memory of previous runs do not count. Only fresh output from the current session constitutes evidence.
The Five-Step Gate
Every completion claim must pass through this gate:
- Identify — Determine which command proves your claim. "Tests pass" requires running the test suite. "No lint errors" requires running the linter. "It builds" requires running the build.
- Execute — Run the command freshly. Not from memory. Not from a previous session. Right now, in the current session.
- Read — Read the FULL output. Do not skim. Do not assume. If the output is long, read all of it. Errors can hide at the end.
- Verify — Confirm the output actually supports your claim. A test suite that prints results but exits with a failure code does not pass. A build that emits warnings about missing dependencies is not clean.
- Assert — Only after steps 1-4 are complete, state your claim and include the evidence. Quote the relevant output.
WordPress/PHP Verification Checklist
Before claiming work is complete in this project, run each applicable command and confirm clean output:
| Check | Command | What it proves |
| Tests | vendor/bin/phpunit | All unit and integration tests pass |
| Coding standards | vendor/bin/phpcs --standard=WordPress . | Code conforms to WordPress coding standards |
| Syntax check | php -l *.php | No PHP syntax errors in changed files |
| WordPress loads | wp eval 'echo "OK";' | WordPress boots without fatal errors |
| Clear caches | wp cache flush and wp transient delete --all | Stale cache is not masking issues |
Run these in order. A syntax error caught by php -l is cheaper to fix than one discovered by PHPUnit. Coding standards violations are cheaper to fix before tests run. Always clear caches before final verification to ensure you are testing real behavior, not cached results.
For the syntax check, target changed files specifically rather than the entire codebase. Use php -l on each modified PHP file. For recursive checking, use find . -name "*.php" -exec php -l {} \; scoped to the relevant directories.
Red Flags
These phrases are signals that the verification gate has NOT been passed:
- "should" — "Tests should pass" means you did not run them.
- "probably" — "This probably works" means you did not verify it.
- "seems to work" — "It seems to work" means you observed something informal, not a verification command.
- "I believe" — "I believe the build is clean" means you are guessing.
- Premature "Done!" — Claiming completion without showing command output.
- "All good!" — Without evidence, this is an opinion, not a verification.
If you catch yourself using these phrases, stop and run the actual command.
When to Verify
- Before every commit — Run the full checklist. Do not commit code that fails any check.
- Before marking a task done — The task is not done until verification proves it.
- Before creating a PR — The PR description should reference verification results.
- Before reporting status — "Feature complete" means verified, not "I think I finished writing code."
- Before delegating "completed" work — If you hand off work as complete, you are vouching for it. Verify first.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

