agentleFS
ivklgnivklgn/ai-kit/skills/seo-audit/SKILL.md

seo-audit

Skill12 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub

Manual, strategic SEO review and methodology — no tooling required. Use when the user wants to audit, diagnose, or improve SEO and ranking, or mentions "SEO audit," "technical SEO," "why am I not ranking," "on-page SEO," "meta tags review," "E-E-A-T," or "SEO health check." Covers crawlability, on-page, content quality, and keyword strategy, ending in a prioritized report. For an automated, crawler-driven scan with a health score, use the audit-website skill instead.

185 other projects use a version of this, 88 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use openseo-review-web-content, openseo-release-notes and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • JwuthriSkill

    openseo-review-web-content

    Write and review content for the OpenSEO website (web/) — blog posts, guides, feature pages, FAQs. Distills the philosophy for on-brand, useful, accurate content. Use whenever adding or editing user-facing prose in web/content or web/src.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • JwuthriSkill

    openseo-release-notes

    Cut an OpenSEO release — bump the version, draft user-facing release notes from commits since the last tag, run a review + subagent-verification pass, and open a "release: vX.X.X" PR. Use when the user asks to prepare a release, bump the version, or write release notes.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • nicepkgSkill

    community-led-growth

    Expert in community-led growth (CLG) - leveraging user communities to drive acquisition, retention, and expansion. Covers building developer communities, user groups, ambassador programs, and turning customers into advocates. Knows the difference between community as a feature vs community as a growth engine, and how to measure community ROI. Use when "community-led, CLG, ambassador program, champion program, user community, developer community, word of mouth, user group, " mentioned.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • nicepkgSkill

    ph-community-outreach

    Engage Reddit, Indie Hackers, Hacker News and other communities for Product Hunt launches. Use this skill to identify relevant communities, craft appropriate posts, and drive cross-platform engagement without appearing spammy.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • xfstudioSkill

    micro-saas-launcher

    Expert in launching small, focused SaaS products fast - the indie hacker approach to building profitable software. Covers idea validation, MVP development, pricing, launch strategies, and growing to sustainable revenue. Ship in weeks, not months. Use when: micro saas, indie hacker, small saas, side project, saas mvp.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • akii-technologies-ltdSkill

    keyword-clustering

    Cluster and organize keywords into topical groups for SEO. Use when the user asks to "cluster keywords", "group keywords", "organize keywords", "keyword mapping", "topic clusters", "keyword grouping", "build a content plan", "pillar pages", "topical authority", "semantic clustering", or pastes a list of keywords.

    Also in 12 projects that use this

  • +4 more from nicepkg
  • +2 more from Jwuthri

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

15 rules. 0 are common, 14 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 166 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 14

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    If .claude/product-marketing-context.md exists, read it before asking questions.

    line 14
  2. Distinctive:

    Check for unintentional blocks

    line 53
  3. Distinctive:

    Verify important pages allowed

    line 54
  4. Distinctive:

    Search Console coverage report

    line 84
  5. Distinctive:

    All pages have canonical tags

    line 97
  6. Distinctive:

    Search Console Core Web Vitals report

    line 126
  7. Distinctive:

    No compelling reason to click

    line 190
  8. Distinctive:

    Not just for styling

    line 200
  9. Distinctive:

    No H1 on page

    line 207
  10. Distinctive:

    No broken internal links

    line 245
  11. Distinctive:

    Not competing with other pages (cannibalization)

    line 262
  12. Distinctive:

    No major gaps in coverage

    line 267
  13. Distinctive:

    No glossary/educational content

    line 327
  14. Distinctive:

    No Google Business Profile optimization

    line 349
  15. Distinctive:

    Do you have Search Console access?

    line 419

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 166 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

SEO Audit

You are an expert in search engine optimization. Your goal is to identify SEO issues and provide actionable recommendations to improve organic search performance.

Initial Assessment

Check for product marketing context first: If .claude/product-marketing-context.md exists, read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task.

Before auditing, understand:

  1. Site Context
    • What type of site? (SaaS, e-commerce, blog, etc.)
    • What's the primary business goal for SEO?
    • What keywords/topics are priorities?
  2. Current State
    • Any known issues or concerns?
    • Current organic traffic level?
    • Recent changes or migrations?
  3. Scope
    • Full site audit or specific pages?
    • Technical + on-page, or one focus area?
    • Access to Search Console / analytics?

Audit Framework

Priority Order

  1. Crawlability & Indexation (can Google find and index it?)
  2. Technical Foundations (is the site fast and functional?)
  3. On-Page Optimization (is content optimized?)
  4. Content Quality (does it deserve to rank?)
  5. Authority & Links (does it have credibility?)

Technical SEO Audit

Crawlability

Robots.txt

  • Check for unintentional blocks
  • Verify important pages allowed
  • Check sitemap reference

XML Sitemap

  • Exists and accessible
  • Submitted to Search Console
  • Contains only canonical, indexable URLs
  • Updated regularly
  • Proper formatting

Site Architecture

  • Important pages within 3 clicks of homepage
  • Logical hierarchy
  • Internal linking structure
  • No orphan pages

Crawl Budget Issues (for large sites)

  • Parameterized URLs under control
  • Faceted navigation handled properly
  • Infinite scroll with pagination fallback
  • Session IDs not in URLs

Indexation

Index Status

  • site:domain.com check
  • Search Console coverage report
  • Compare indexed vs. expected

Indexation Issues

  • Noindex tags on important pages
  • Canonicals pointing wrong direction
  • Redirect chains/loops
  • Soft 404s
  • Duplicate content without canonicals

Canonicalization

  • All pages have canonical tags
  • Self-referencing canonicals on unique pages
  • HTTP → HTTPS canonicals
  • www vs. non-www consistency
  • Trailing slash consistency

Site Speed & Core Web Vitals

Core Web Vitals

  • LCP (Largest Contentful Paint): < 2.5s
  • INP (Interaction to Next Paint): < 200ms
  • CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift): < 0.1

Speed Factors

  • Server response time (TTFB)
  • Image optimization
  • JavaScript execution
  • CSS delivery
  • Caching headers
  • CDN usage
  • Font loading

Tools

  • PageSpeed Insights
  • WebPageTest
  • Chrome DevTools
  • Search Console Core Web Vitals report

Mobile-Friendliness

  • Responsive design (not separate m. site)
  • Tap target sizes
  • Viewport configured
  • No horizontal scroll
  • Same content as desktop
  • Mobile-first indexing readiness

Security & HTTPS

  • HTTPS across entire site
  • Valid SSL certificate
  • No mixed content
  • HTTP → HTTPS redirects
  • HSTS header (bonus)

URL Structure

  • Readable, descriptive URLs
  • Keywords in URLs where natural
  • Consistent structure
  • No unnecessary parameters
  • Lowercase and hyphen-separated

On-Page SEO Audit

Title Tags

Check for:

  • Unique titles for each page
  • Primary keyword near beginning
  • 50-60 characters (visible in SERP)
  • Compelling and click-worthy
  • Brand name placement (end, usually)

Common issues:

  • Duplicate titles
  • Too long (truncated)
  • Too short (wasted opportunity)
  • Keyword stuffing
  • Missing entirely

Meta Descriptions

Check for:

  • Unique descriptions per page
  • 150-160 characters
  • Includes primary keyword
  • Clear value proposition
  • Call to action

Common issues:

  • Duplicate descriptions
  • Auto-generated garbage
  • Too long/short
  • No compelling reason to click

Heading Structure

Check for:

  • One H1 per page
  • H1 contains primary keyword
  • Logical hierarchy (H1 → H2 → H3)
  • Headings describe content
  • Not just for styling

Common issues:

  • Multiple H1s
  • Skip levels (H1 → H3)
  • Headings used for styling only
  • No H1 on page

Content Optimization

Primary Page Content

  • Keyword in first 100 words
  • Related keywords naturally used
  • Sufficient depth/length for topic
  • Answers search intent
  • Better than competitors

Thin Content Issues

  • Pages with little unique content
  • Tag/category pages with no value
  • Doorway pages
  • Duplicate or near-duplicate content

Image Optimization

Check for:

  • Descriptive file names
  • Alt text on all images
  • Alt text describes image
  • Compressed file sizes
  • Modern formats (WebP)
  • Lazy loading implemented
  • Responsive images

Internal Linking

Check for:

  • Important pages well-linked
  • Descriptive anchor text
  • Logical link relationships
  • No broken internal links
  • Reasonable link count per page

Common issues:

  • Orphan pages (no internal links)
  • Over-optimized anchor text
  • Important pages buried
  • Excessive footer/sidebar links

Keyword Targeting

Per Page

  • Clear primary keyword target
  • Title, H1, URL aligned
  • Content satisfies search intent
  • Not competing with other pages (cannibalization)

Site-Wide

  • Keyword mapping document
  • No major gaps in coverage
  • No keyword cannibalization
  • Logical topical clusters

Content Quality Assessment

E-E-A-T Signals

Experience

  • First-hand experience demonstrated
  • Original insights/data
  • Real examples and case studies

Expertise

  • Author credentials visible
  • Accurate, detailed information
  • Properly sourced claims

Authoritativeness

  • Recognized in the space
  • Cited by others
  • Industry credentials

Trustworthiness

  • Accurate information
  • Transparent about business
  • Contact information available
  • Privacy policy, terms
  • Secure site (HTTPS)

Content Depth

  • Comprehensive coverage of topic
  • Answers follow-up questions
  • Better than top-ranking competitors
  • Updated and current

User Engagement Signals

  • Time on page
  • Bounce rate in context
  • Pages per session
  • Return visits

Common Issues by Site Type

SaaS/Product Sites

  • Product pages lack content depth
  • Blog not integrated with product pages
  • Missing comparison/alternative pages
  • Feature pages thin on content
  • No glossary/educational content

E-commerce

  • Thin category pages
  • Duplicate product descriptions
  • Missing product schema
  • Faceted navigation creating duplicates
  • Out-of-stock pages mishandled

Content/Blog Sites

  • Outdated content not refreshed
  • Keyword cannibalization
  • No topical clustering
  • Poor internal linking
  • Missing author pages

Local Business

  • Inconsistent NAP
  • Missing local schema
  • No Google Business Profile optimization
  • Missing location pages
  • No local content

Output Format

Audit Report Structure

Executive Summary

  • Overall health assessment
  • Top 3-5 priority issues
  • Quick wins identified

Technical SEO Findings For each issue:

  • Issue: What's wrong
  • Impact: SEO impact (High/Medium/Low)
  • Evidence: How you found it
  • Fix: Specific recommendation
  • Priority: 1-5 or High/Medium/Low

On-Page SEO Findings Same format as above

Content Findings Same format as above

Prioritized Action Plan

  1. Critical fixes (blocking indexation/ranking)
  2. High-impact improvements
  3. Quick wins (easy, immediate benefit)
  4. Long-term recommendations

References

  • AI Writing Detection: Common AI writing patterns to avoid (em dashes, overused phrases, filler words)
  • AEO & GEO Patterns: Content patterns optimized for answer engines and AI citation

Tools Referenced

Free Tools

  • Google Search Console (essential)
  • Google PageSpeed Insights
  • Bing Webmaster Tools
  • Rich Results Test
  • Mobile-Friendly Test
  • Schema Validator

Paid Tools (if available)

  • Screaming Frog
  • Ahrefs / Semrush
  • Sitebulb
  • ContentKing

Task-Specific Questions

  1. What pages/keywords matter most?
  2. Do you have Search Console access?
  3. Any recent changes or migrations?
  4. Who are your top organic competitors?
  5. What's your current organic traffic baseline?

Related Skills

  • audit-website: For an automated, crawler-driven scan (squirrelscan CLI) that checks 230+ rules and returns a health score — complements this manual methodology. Use it for fast mechanical coverage, then use this skill for strategy and content judgment.

Note: programmatic-seo, schema-markup, page-cro, and analytics-tracking are referenced by the original methodology but are not bundled in this plugin.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.