readback
Skill5 starsChanged 11 days agoMITView on GitHub
Restate the user's intention to verify alignment.
5 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- menot-you/n-soultheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- agentydragon/ducktapetheir own version, first seen Oct 9, 2026
- olcayseygan/crumoratheir own version, first seen Oct 2, 2026
- wilbeibi/wilbeibi-skillstheir own version, first seen Sep 7, 2026
- backnotprop/brotheir own version, first seen Jul 12, 2026
Other versions5 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 5
- backnotprop/bro★ 176same name
- agentydragon/ducktape★ 11same name
- wilbeibi/wilbeibi-skills★ 2same name
- menot-you/n-soul★ 0same name
- olcayseygan/crumora★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository23 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- architecture-knowledge-baseSkill
- audio-transcribeSkill
- better-uiSkill
- brainstormingSkill
- broSkill
- chatgpt-imagegenSkill
- coding-standardsSkill
- decision-roomSkill
- deslopifySkill
- domain-modelingSkill
- frontend-designSkill
- gemini-ttsSkill
- goalSkill
- rephraseSkill
- reply-broSkill
- setup-goalSkill
- skill-cleanerSkill
- strunk-writing-qualitySkill
- technical-writingSkill
- tech-specSkill
- tool-installSkill
- type-breakdownSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
10 rules. 0 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 5 edited versions we read keep these.
10
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 12
Use it to catch misunderstandings before they become wrong work.
- Distinctive: line 24
Keep important constraints and conditions.
- Distinctive: line 27
Stop and wait for confirmation or correction.
- Distinctive: line 31
Use established terms of art when they accurately describe the user's intent, but immediately gloss them in plain English.
- Distinctive: line 47
Do not introduce jargon just to sound technical.
- Distinctive: line 51
Do not turn the readback into an implementation plan.
- Distinctive: line 52
Do not silently resolve meaningful ambiguity.
- Distinctive: line 54
Use domain language when useful, followed by a plain-English gloss.
- Distinctive: line 55
If the user corrects the readback, update it before proceeding.
- Distinctive: line 59
Make sure your response sounds like a person talking to another.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 5 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Definition
A readback repeats an instruction, request, or piece of information back to the user. It states what the agent believes the user asked or meant, so the user can confirm or correct the understanding before work continues.
Use it to catch misunderstandings before they become wrong work.
Purpose
- Confirm that the agent correctly received and understood the user's instruction or intent.
- Allow the user to verify accuracy and correct any misunderstanding.
- Prevent errors caused by acting on a mistaken interpretation.
Process
- Inspect the relevant context.
- Infer the user's intention or meaning.
- Keep important constraints and conditions.
- Name assumptions or unresolved ambiguity.
- Give the readback.
- Stop and wait for confirmation or correction.
Domain Language + Plain-English Gloss
Use established terms of art when they accurately describe the user's intent, but immediately gloss them in plain English.
Prefer:
Use a vertical slice — build one small part of the feature end-to-end so it can actually be tested.
Over either:
Use a vertical slice.
or:
Build one small part through every layer of the system...
The idea is to preserve useful domain language without requiring the user to already know it.
Do not introduce jargon just to sound technical. Use it when it gives the idea a useful name.
Rules
- Do not turn the readback into an implementation plan.
- Do not silently resolve meaningful ambiguity.
- Preserve conditions closely enough that their meaning cannot be lost.
- Use domain language when useful, followed by a plain-English gloss.
- If the user corrects the readback, update it before proceeding.
Principle
Make sure your response sounds like a person talking to another. Drop jargon, ceremony, repetition, and unnecessary structure. Preserve the meaning and try to match user's tone/voice.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

