agentleFS
itsryanarmaniitsryanarmani/skills/release-notes/SKILL.md

release-notes

Skill1 starsChanged 4 days agoMITView on GitHub

Use when preparing release notes or a user-facing changelog for a new version — diffing branches, filtering to user-facing changes, and writing in a consistent product voice. Triggers include "write release notes", "draft the changelog", "release notes for v2.x", "what shipped this release".

176 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use brainstorm-experiments-existing, brainstorm-ideas-new and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • skytiger6724Skill

    brainstorm-experiments-existing

    Design experiments to test assumptions for an existing product — prototypes, A/B tests, spikes, and other low-effort validation methods. Use when validating assumptions, testing feature ideas cheaply, or planning product experiments.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • skytiger6724Skill

    brainstorm-ideas-new

    Brainstorm feature ideas for a new product in initial discovery from PM, Designer, and Engineer perspectives. Use when starting product discovery for a new product, exploring features for a startup idea, or doing initial ideation.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • 45ckSkill

    pestle-analysis

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • About-IntelligenceSkill

    positioning-ideas

    Brainstorm product positioning ideas differentiated from competitors.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • About-IntelligenceSkill

    product-name

    Brainstorm 5 unique, memorable product names with rationale aligned to brand values and target audience.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • +7 more from skytiger6724

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 161 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 2

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Write release notes for a new version that match your product's established voice.

    line 8
  2. Very specific:

    NOT for internal dev changelogs (those keep refactors/CI/deps).

    line 13
  3. Distinctive:

    Default format — a flat bullet list under a version header, features first, bug fixes last:

    line 47
  4. Very specific:

    Start every bullet with an action verb: Added…, Improved…, Increased … from X to Y, Fixed a bug where….

    line 58
  5. Very specific:

    No emoji. Match the version header style of past notes (e.g.

    line 64

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 161 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Release Notes

Write release notes for a new version that match your product's established voice. The hard part is filtering hundreds of commits down to what users can see and writing it like you're telling a friend what changed — not reciting a git log.

When to use

  • Preparing a release / writing a changelog / updating the docs-site release notes.
  • NOT for internal dev changelogs (those keep refactors/CI/deps).

Inputs (ask if missing)

  • Version (e.g. 2.1).
  • Release branch (what's shipping) and base branch (what's live now). Default base = origin/release or origin/main.
  • Voice reference — 2–3 past release notes to match format/tone. If none, ask for the docs-site URL or infer a simple flat-bullet style.

Process

digraph rn {
  "Identify branches" [shape=box];
  "Diff all commits" [shape=box];
  "Read planning docs" [shape=box];
  "Categorize (user-facing only)" [shape=box];
  "Draft in product voice" [shape=box];
  "User review" [shape=diamond];
  "Finalize + suggest doc updates" [shape=box];
  "Identify branches" -> "Diff all commits" -> "Categorize (user-facing only)";
  "Identify branches" -> "Read planning docs" -> "Categorize (user-facing only)";
  "Categorize (user-facing only)" -> "Draft in product voice" -> "User review";
  "User review" -> "Finalize + suggest doc updates" [label="approved"];
  "User review" -> "Draft in product voice" [label="revise"];
}

1–2. Branches + full diff

git fetch origin, find the release and base branches, then pull every commit (git log --oneline base..target), paging in chunks of ~200. For 500+ commits, fan out parallel agents over chunks.

3. Categorize — user-facing ONLY

Sort commits into buckets: New features · Plan/limit changes · Section/area improvements · UX improvements · <domain area> · Bug fixes. Skip entirely: refactors, tests, CI/CD, dependency bumps (unless user-visible), docs, dev tooling, merge commits, monitoring/logging, backend internals.

4. Draft in product voice

Default format — a flat bullet list under a version header, features first, bug fixes last:

## X.Y (Mon DD, YYYY)
- [Biggest new feature first]
- ...
- Fixed a bug where [specific notable fix]
- Other minor bug fixes and improvements

Writing rules:

  1. Start every bullet with an action verb: Added…, Improved…, Increased … from X to Y, Fixed a bug where….
  2. Exact numbers for limit changes ("from 3 to 5", never just "increased").
  3. Tag plan-gated features (e.g. (Pro plan)); add (learn more) + link for major ones.
  4. User-facing language — "your website", not "the DOM"; name features the way users see them. No internal tech names (frameworks, datastores, infra).
  5. One sentence per bullet (max two). 10–20 bullets for a major release, 3–5 for a patch.
  6. Bundle minor fixes; give 2–4 specific fixes + one catch-all (Other minor bug fixes and improvements).
  7. No emoji. Match the version header style of past notes (e.g. 2.1 not v2.1).
  8. Tone: warm, confident, direct ("Added" not "We've added"); focus on user benefit ("loads up to 90% faster") not implementation ("migrated to static generation").

5. Finalize

Output: (1) the formatted notes ready to paste, (2) support/docs articles that likely need updating, (3) suggested new articles for major features.

Common mistakes

  • Including internal changes (refactors, deps, CI) — users don't care.
  • Vague limit changes without the before/after numbers.
  • Implementation language instead of user benefit.
  • Listing every bug fix instead of bundling.
  • Drifting from the established header/tone — always match past notes.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.