create-pr
Skill4 starsChanged 44 days agoMITView on GitHub
Group uncommitted changes into logical conventional commits, push them to a feature branch, and open a GitHub pull request with a release-please friendly description. Use when the user types /create-pr or asks to commit their changes and open a PR.
- Commits and pushes
196 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- lohi-ai/babysittheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- alexandrosandre/agentic-engineeringtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- alexandrosandre/alice-issue-agenttheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- rccsousa/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- next-step/nextstep-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- blamechris/chroxytheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use update-pr, act-on-feedback and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
MicrosoftSkillupdate-pr
Update the pull request for the current session. Use when the user wants to push new changes to an existing PR.
Also in 9 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillact-on-feedback
Act on user feedback attached to the current session. Use when the user submits feedback on the session's changes via the Submit Feedback button.
Also in 3 projects that use this
ModelEngine-GroupSkillcreate-release-note
从 PR/commit 中自动生成结构化的 Release Notes,并可选创建 GitHub Draft Release。支持 x.y.0 版本合并前一 minor 系列的 release notes。当用户要求生成发布说明、创建 release notes 时触发。参数为版本号和可选的上一版本号。
Also in 3 projects that use this
frostneySkillnative-nostalgia-stack
Applies the user's FreePascal toolchain and its build, formatting, hook, and test contracts while leaving project-specific mechanics local. Use when scaffolding or working in a FreePascal project that follows this toolchain.
Also in 3 projects that use this
frostneySkillsoftware-engineering-excellence
Applies the user's engineering standards during substantial technical work: preserve scope, use current evidence, delegate independent parts, and complete authorized outcomes. Use during substantial implementation, debugging, refactoring, or multi-part delivery work.
Also in 3 projects that use this
parkchuSkillstart-mission
넥스트스텝(NextStep) 미션을 처음 시작할 때, 미션 저장소를 fork·clone하고 최초 작업 브랜치(step1 등)까지 만들어 준다. gh CLI로 fork하고 clone까지 이어서 처리하며, gh가 없거나 인증이 안 돼 있으면 브라우저 Fork 안내로 폴백한다. 이미 fork/clone돼 있으면 재사용하고 이어서 진행한다(재실행 안전). 사용자가 "미션 시작하려는데 저장소 세팅해줘", "새 미션 시작할래", "fork부터 해줘", "/nextstep:start-mission" 등으로 요청할 때 사용한다.
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +1 more from microsoft
Other versions196 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 196
- microsoft/vscode★ 195ksame name
- vercel/next.js★ 143ksame name
- penpot/penpot★ 62ksame name
- remix-run/react-router★ 57ksame name
- moeru-ai/airi★ 51ksame name
- ToolJet/ToolJet★ 41ksame name
- ueberdosis/tiptap★ 39ksame name
- BabylonJS/Babylon.js★ 26ksame name
- kortix-ai/suna★ 21ksame name
- kortix-ai/CompanyOS★ 21ksame name
186 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository7 other files it gives its agents.
- evidence-reviewSkill
- explainSkill
- minimalistSkill
- readme-marketerSkill
- systems-thinkingSkill
- taskfileSkill
- writing-clearly-and-conciselySkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
10 rules. 0 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 179 edited versions we read keep these.
10
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 19
test: Test changes (no version bump)
- Distinctive: line 35
When this skill is invoked:
- Distinctive: line 46
By layer: Keep related files together (e.g., API handler + its test file)
- Distinctive: line 55
Test additions → can be separate or with implementation
- Distinctive: line 145
PR Title: Use the primary/most significant change as the PR title.
- Distinctive: line 152
Create multiple logical commits: instead of one massive commit
- Distinctive: line 157
Breaking changes: must include BREAKING CHANGE: in commit footer or !
- Distinctive: line 158
PR title: should reflect the primary change or summarize multiple changes
- Distinctive: line 250
All changes are tightly coupled and inseparable
- Distinctive: line 259
Create multiple commits in logical progression order
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 179 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Create Pull Request with Release-Please Guidelines
This skill automates the process of committing changes, pushing to GitHub, and creating a Pull Request with a comprehensive description following Google release-please guidelines.
Conventional Commit Types
- feat: New feature (triggers minor version bump)
- fix: Bug fix (triggers patch version bump)
- feat! or fix!: Breaking change (triggers major version bump)
- chore: Maintenance tasks (no version bump)
- docs: Documentation changes (no version bump)
- refactor: Code refactoring (no version bump)
- test: Test changes (no version bump)
- perf: Performance improvements (triggers patch version bump)
Release-Please Guidelines
PR descriptions should include:
- Clear title: Following conventional commits format
- Summary: What changed and why
- Breaking Changes: Clearly marked with BREAKING CHANGE: footer
- Related Issues: Link to issues using Fixes or Closes keywords
- Test Plan: How to verify the changes
- Release Notes: User-facing description of changes
Instructions for Claude
When this skill is invoked:
- Check git status and diff:
git status git diff --staged git diff Group changes into logical commits by analyzing:
- By feature/functionality: Group files that implement the same feature together
- By layer: Keep related files together (e.g., API handler + its test file)
- By change type: Separate refactoring from new features from bug fixes
- By scope: Group changes affecting the same module/package
Common grouping patterns:
handler.go+handler_test.go→ one commitapi.yaml+ generatedopenapi/*.gen.go→ one commit- Multiple files for same feature → one commit
- Unrelated fixes → separate commits
- Test additions → can be separate or with implementation
- Determine commit type for each group:
- New features → feat
- Bug fixes → fix
- Breaking changes → Add ! suffix or BREAKING CHANGE: footer
- Other changes → chore, refactor, docs, test, etc.
- Identify the scope for each commit (optional but recommended):
- Examples:
api,config,workflow,provider,auth, etc.
- Examples:
- Check current branch:
git branch --show-current - If on main/master, create a new feature branch:
Examples:git checkout -b <type>/<scope>-<short-description>feat/api-appointment-slots,fix/auth-token-validation Create commits for each logical group (repeat for each group):
# Stage only files for this commit group git add <file1> <file2> ... # Create the commit git commit -m "<type>(<scope>): <description> <body with detailed explanation> BREAKING CHANGE: <description if applicable> Fixes #<issue-number> (if applicable)"Commit order: Order commits so that reading them oldest-first explains the change, usually setup, then implementation, then tests and docs. Tests may share a commit with the code they cover.
- Push to remote:
git push -u origin <branch-name> Create PR with comprehensive description:
gh pr create --title "<primary-change-title>" --body "$(cat <<'EOF' ## Summary <1-3 sentence summary of what changed and why> ## Commits - `<short-sha>` <commit title> ## Changes - <bullet point list of key changes> - <each change should be clear and specific> ## Breaking Changes <If applicable, list breaking changes with migration guide> <If not applicable, write "None"> ## Test Plan - [ ] <How to test the changes> - [ ] <Include specific curl commands or test steps> - [ ] <Verify no regressions> ## Related Issues Fixes #<issue-number> (if applicable) Closes #<issue-number> (if applicable) ## Release Notes <User-facing description for changelog> <Written from user perspective> <Highlight value and impact> ## Screenshots/Logs <If applicable, include relevant screenshots or log outputs> ## Checklist - [ ] Tests pass locally (project test command) - [ ] Linting passes (project lint command) - [ ] Documentation updated (if needed) - [ ] Breaking changes documented - [ ] Conventional commit format followed EOF )"PR Title: Use the primary/most significant change as the PR title. If all commits are of equal importance, use a summary title that encompasses the changes.
- Display PR URL and confirm successful creation
Important Notes
- Create multiple logical commits instead of one massive commit
- Each commit should be atomic: It should represent one logical change that could stand alone
- Always follow Conventional Commits format for commit messages
- Use imperative mood in commit descriptions (e.g., "add feature" not "added feature")
- Keep commit title under 72 characters
- Breaking changes must include BREAKING CHANGE: in commit footer or ! after type/scope
- PR title should reflect the primary change or summarize multiple changes
- Verify all services are properly tested before creating PR
- Link related issues using GitHub keywords (Fixes, Closes, Resolves)
- Commit order should tell a story: Reading commits chronologically should explain the progression of changes
Example: Multiple Commits for a Feature
Given changes to implement appointment slot filtering, create separate commits:
Commit 1 - API spec update:
docs(api): add provider_type parameter to slots endpoint
Update OpenAPI spec with new query parameter for filtering
appointment slots by provider type.Commit 2 - Core implementation:
feat(api): add appointment slot filtering by provider
Implement endpoint to filter available appointment slots based on
provider type and location preferences. This improves user experience
by showing only relevant appointment options.
- Add provider filter to slots endpoint
- Implement timezone conversion for slot times
Fixes #123Commit 3 - Tests:
test(api): add tests for appointment slot filtering
Add unit tests covering filter logic, timezone conversion,
and edge cases for the new provider filtering feature.Example PR Description (Multiple Commits)
## Summary
Adds appointment slot filtering by provider type to improve user experience when booking appointments.
## Commits
- `a1b2c3d` docs(api): add provider_type parameter to slots endpoint
- `e4f5g6h` feat(api): add appointment slot filtering by provider
- `i7j8k9l` test(api): add tests for appointment slot filtering
## Changes
- Added `provider_type` query parameter to `/v1/appointments/slots` endpoint
- Implemented timezone conversion for accurate slot display across regions
- Updated OpenAPI spec with new filtering parameters
- Added unit tests for filter logic and edge cases
## Breaking Changes
None
## Test Plan
- [ ] Run the test suite to verify all tests pass
- [ ] Test filtering with curl:
```bash
curl -X GET "http://localhost:8080/v1/appointments/slots?start_date=2025-11-01&end_date=2025-11-15&provider_type=primary_care" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer valid-jwt"- Verify timezone handling for different user locations
- Test backward compatibility (endpoint works without filter)
Related Issues
Fixes #123
Release Notes
Users can now filter appointment slots by provider type, making it easier to find appointments with their preferred healthcare provider.
Checklist
- Tests pass locally (project test command)
- Linting passes (project lint command)
- Documentation updated
- Conventional commit format followed
## When to Use Single vs Multiple Commits
**Use multiple commits when:**
- Changes span different concerns (API, tests, docs)
- Changes affect different modules/packages
- You have both bug fixes and new features
- Changes can be logically separated for easier review
- Implementation + tests can be split
**Use a single commit when:**
- All changes are tightly coupled and inseparable
- Very small change (few lines across 1-2 files)
- Single atomic change that makes no sense to split
## Usage
Invoke this skill with `/create-pr` and Claude will:
1. Analyze your uncommitted changes
2. Group changes into logical commit units
3. Create multiple commits in logical progression order
4. Push all commits to the feature branch
5. Generate a comprehensive PR with release-please compatible formatting
6. Open the PR on GitHubDoes it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

