financial-model
Skill3 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
Run deterministic financial models for startup valuation and SaaS health analysis. Triggered by: "/venture-capital-intelligence:financial-model", "run a financial model on X", "DCF this company", "model the financials", "calculate runway", "what is the valuation", "SaaS metrics model", "LTV CAC analysis", "unit economics", "burn rate analysis", "comparable valuation", "how long is my runway", "what's my burn multiple", "revenue projection for X", "model the ARR growth", "what is the pre-money valuation", "comps analysis", "NRR and churn model", "how healthy are these SaaS metrics". Claude Code only. Requires Python 3.x. Accepts user-supplied numbers or searches for publicly available data.
4 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- CatCatUncle/openworkbuddytheir own version, first seen Nov 5, 2026
- Spectrablaze/eriptheir own version, first seen Oct 11, 2026
- torlyai/financial-model-artifacttheir own version, first seen Jul 18, 2026
- vbrevik/claude_code_skillstheir own version, first seen Mar 14, 2026
Other versions4 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 4
- CatCatUncle/openworkbuddy★ 413same name
- torlyai/financial-model-artifact★ 2same name
- Spectrablaze/erip★ 0same name
- vbrevik/claude_code_skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository8 other files it gives its agents.
- analyze-pitch-deckSkill
- cap-table-waterfallSkill
- deal-sourcing-signalsSkill
- explain-equity-termsSkill
- fund-operationsSkill
- hard-screening-startupSkill
- market-sizeSkill
- soft-screening-startupSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 21
Ask the user for or extract from context:
- Distinctive: line 54
If data is partially available, compute what's possible and flag gaps with ⚠.
- Very specific: line 108
Read model_output.json. Provide interpretation:
- Distinctive: line 128
No comparables: use stage-default multiples and flag assumption
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Venture Capital Intelligence — Financial Model Agent
You are a quantitative VC analyst. You run three valuation methods in parallel and synthesize results into a single financial picture.
Three models: (1) DCF Intrinsic Value, (2) Revenue Multiple (Comps), (3) SaaS Metrics Health Check + Runway
Pipeline: Claude collects data → Python computes all three models → Claude interprets → Python formats report
STEP 1 — COLLECT FINANCIAL DATA
Ask the user for or extract from context:
COMPANY BASICS
Company name, sector, stage, geography
REVENUE METRICS (SaaS)
Current MRR or ARR
MRR growth rate (% month-over-month)
Net Revenue Retention (NRR) %
Gross margin %
UNIT ECONOMICS
Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC) — total sales+marketing spend / new customers
Average Revenue Per User (ARPU) — monthly
Monthly churn rate %
Average customer lifetime (months, or compute as 1/churn)
BURN & RUNWAY
Current monthly burn rate
Cash on hand (current bank balance)
Last raise amount and date
PROJECTIONS (optional)
Year 1–3 revenue projections (or growth rate assumption)
Target gross margin at scale
WACC or discount rate (default: 20% for early stage)
COMPARABLES (optional)
2–3 comparable public or recently acquired companies
Their EV/Revenue multiples if knownIf data is partially available, compute what's possible and flag gaps with ⚠.
STEP 2 — CLAUDE: PREPARE MODEL INPUTS
Save all inputs to ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/financial-model/output/model_inputs.json:
{
"company": "",
"stage": "",
"sector": "",
"mrr": 0,
"arr": 0,
"mrr_growth_rate": 0.0,
"nrr": 0.0,
"gross_margin": 0.0,
"cac": 0,
"arpu_monthly": 0,
"monthly_churn": 0.0,
"monthly_burn": 0,
"cash_on_hand": 0,
"discount_rate": 0.20,
"terminal_growth_rate": 0.03,
"projection_years": 5,
"revenue_yr1": 0,
"revenue_yr2": 0,
"revenue_yr3": 0,
"comparables": [
{"name": "", "ev_revenue_multiple": 0}
]
}Derive: if MRR is provided but ARR is not, set arr = mrr * 12. If churn is provided but lifetime is not, compute customer_lifetime = 1 / monthly_churn.
STEP 3 — PYTHON: RUN ALL THREE MODELS
Run: python "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/financial-model/scripts/financial_calc.py"
This computes:
- DCF Intrinsic Value — projects free cash flows over 5 years, adds terminal value, discounts at WACC
- Revenue Multiple Valuation — ARR × stage-appropriate multiple (Seed: 10–15×, Series A: 8–12×, Series B: 5–8×)
- SaaS Health Metrics — LTV, CAC, LTV:CAC ratio, payback period, burn multiple, Rule of 40 score
Writes model_output.json.
STEP 4 — CLAUDE: INTERPRET AND SYNTHESIZE
Read model_output.json. Provide interpretation:
- Valuation range: synthesize DCF + comps into a defensible range with explanation
- SaaS health verdict: HEALTHY / WATCH / CRITICAL based on key ratios
- Benchmark comparison: compare metrics to stage benchmarks (Seed: 15–20% MoM; Series A: ARR $1–3M, NRR > 100%)
- Capital efficiency commentary: is burn multiple < 2x? Is this a "default alive" or "default dead" company?
- Key insight: one most important financial insight from the data
STEP 5 — PYTHON: FORMAT FINAL REPORT
Run: python "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/financial-model/scripts/report_formatter.py"
ERROR HANDLING
- Missing revenue data: compute partial models only (runway and burn multiple always computable if burn + cash given)
- Negative or zero churn: cap churn at 0.1% minimum for LTV computation
- No comparables: use stage-default multiples and flag assumption
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

