agentleFS
irwebtoolsirwebtools/Product-Skills/skills/delivery/developer-handoff/SKILL.md

developer-handoff

Skill0 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub

Package accepted product work for Development Team continuation.

3 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

8 rules. 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 6

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Use when the task matches: developer-handoff, DEV_READY, handoff.

    line 10
  2. Distinctive:

    Document FSD structure, changed files, and run setup.

    line 25
  3. Distinctive:

    Do not grant production release permission.

    line 27
  4. Distinctive:

    Keep Product validation and engineering verification distinct.

    line 41
  5. Distinctive:

    Do not claim completion without evidence.

    line 42
  6. Distinctive:

    Do not rewrite the app during handoff.

    line 46
  7. Distinctive:

    Do not omit mocks as if they were real integrations.

    line 47
  8. Very specific:

    Do not treat DEV_READY as production authorization.

    line 48

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

developer-handoff

When to use

Use when the task matches: developer-handoff, DEV_READY, handoff.

Purpose

Give developers intent, structure, limitations, and next production steps.

Inputs

  • Validated definition and UX
  • POC and verification evidence
  • Architecture decision

Process

  1. Summarize product intent in Product language.
  2. Document FSD structure, changed files, and run setup.
  3. List known limitations and owners for deferred work.
  4. Do not grant production release permission.

Outputs

  • Product intent
  • Implemented features
  • FSD structure
  • Changed files
  • Known limitations
  • Production next steps

Verification

  • Confirm each output exists and is reviewable.
  • Keep Product validation and engineering verification distinct.
  • Do not claim completion without evidence.

Restrictions

  • Do not rewrite the app during handoff.
  • Do not omit mocks as if they were real integrations.
  • Do not treat DEV_READY as production authorization.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.