claude-code-dev / rules
Cursor rule1 starsChanged 15 months agoMITView on GitHub
Guidelines for continuously improving Cursor rules based on emerging code patterns and best practices.
We split this self_improve.mdc into the rules it gives an agent
10 rules. About 0 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈10
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 17
Look for references to external documentation
- Distinctive: line 18
Check for consistent error handling patterns
- Distinctive: line 57
Update rules after major refactors
- Distinctive: line 58
Add links to relevant documentation
- Distinctive: line 63
Remove rules that no longer apply
- Distinctive: line 64
Update references to deprecated rules
- Distinctive: line 65
Document migration paths for old patterns
- Distinctive: line 68
Keep examples synchronized with code
- Distinctive: line 69
Update references to external docs
- Distinctive: line 72
Follow cursor_rules.mdc for proper rule formatting and structure.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 6,350 Cursor rule files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
---
description: Guidelines for continuously improving Cursor rules based on emerging code patterns and best practices.
globs: **/*
alwaysApply: true
---
- **Rule Improvement Triggers:**
- New code patterns not covered by existing rules
- Repeated similar implementations across files
- Common error patterns that could be prevented
- New libraries or tools being used consistently
- Emerging best practices in the codebase
- **Analysis Process:**
- Compare new code with existing rules
- Identify patterns that should be standardized
- Look for references to external documentation
- Check for consistent error handling patterns
- Monitor test patterns and coverage
- **Rule Updates:**
- **Add New Rules When:**
- A new technology/pattern is used in 3+ files
- Common bugs could be prevented by a rule
- Code reviews repeatedly mention the same feedback
- New security or performance patterns emerge
- **Modify Existing Rules When:**
- Better examples exist in the codebase
- Additional edge cases are discovered
- Related rules have been updated
- Implementation details have changed
- **Example Pattern Recognition:**
```typescript
// If you see repeated patterns like:
const data = await prisma.user.findMany({
select: { id: true, email: true },
where: { status: 'ACTIVE' }
});
// Consider adding to [prisma.mdc](mdc:.cursor/rules/prisma.mdc):
// - Standard select fields
// - Common where conditions
// - Performance optimization patterns
```
- **Rule Quality Checks:**
- Rules should be actionable and specific
- Examples should come from actual code
- References should be up to date
- Patterns should be consistently enforced
- **Continuous Improvement:**
- Monitor code review comments
- Track common development questions
- Update rules after major refactors
- Add links to relevant documentation
- Cross-reference related rules
- **Rule Deprecation:**
- Mark outdated patterns as deprecated
- Remove rules that no longer apply
- Update references to deprecated rules
- Document migration paths for old patterns
- **Documentation Updates:**
- Keep examples synchronized with code
- Update references to external docs
- Maintain links between related rules
- Document breaking changes
Follow [cursor_rules.mdc](mdc:.cursor/rules/cursor_rules.mdc) for proper rule formatting and structure.
Other versions7 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 7
- maybe-finance/maybe★ 54k100% same
- eyaltoledano/claude-task-master★ 28k100% same
- superdesigndev/superdesign★ 7.1k100% same
- gaoxt/zhouwenwang★ 164100% same
- HexSleeves/tailscale-mcp★ 149100% same
- msdio/stackticon★ 45100% same
- gtrias/i18next-mcp-server★ 12100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Where files are headingNew Cursor rule files have more rules about planning and tracking tasks, and fewer about code style.
Of the Cursor rule files we read, the 3,978 first seen in the last six months, against the older ones: the kind of rule that gained most share, and the kind that lost most. About files like this in general, not this one, and an estimate, since a kind is a pattern in the words.
In this repository5 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- docs/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .cursor/rules/cursor_rules.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/taskmaster/dev_workflow.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/taskmaster/taskmaster.mdcCursor rule
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

