agentleFS
indulgebackindulgeback/claude-code-memory-skill/SKILL.md

claude-code-memory

Skill0 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub

Use when you want to set up, maintain, or review a Claude Code style layered memory workflow, including `CLAUDE.md` rules, session memory, durable memory, and promotion of stable learnings into instruction files.

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

  • Other versions1 project uses a version of this.

    Word for word · 0

    None found.

    Edited · 0

    None found.

    Wrote their own version · 1

    1. jnerytech/specd★ 0same name

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

28 rules. About 0 are common, 26 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈26

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  • could be automatic: a setting could enforce it
  1. Distinctive:

    Use this skill when the task involves memory design or memory hygiene for Claude Code or a similar coding agent.

    line 8
  2. Distinctive:

    Treat the host instruction file as the rule layer.

    line 26
  3. Distinctive:

    Put information here only if it is:

    line 28
  4. Distinctive:

    Do not place transient task state here.

    line 43
  5. Distinctive:

    Keep it concise but concrete.

    line 80
  6. Very specific:

    Use .agent-memory/ for long-lived memories that should survive across conversations.

    line 84
  7. Distinctive:

    Use the following durable memory types:

    line 88
  8. Distinctive:

    run tests before proposing a commit

    line 105
  9. Distinctive:

    avoid long recap paragraphs

    line 106
  10. Distinctive:

    prefer one bundled refactor PR in this codebase

    line 107
  11. Distinctive:

    Do not save these unless there is a strong reason and the non-obvious part is the actual point:

    line 158
  12. Distinctive:

    If it can be recovered cheaply from the current repo, prefer not to save it as durable memory.

    line 167
  13. Distinctive:

    Never trust durable memory blindly.

    line 171
  14. Distinctive:

    Before acting on it:

    line 173
  15. Distinctive:

    verify named files still exist

    line 175
  16. Distinctive:

    prefer current repo state over historical memory if they conflict

    line 177
  17. Distinctive:

    update or remove stale memories when you discover drift

    line 178
  18. Distinctive:

    When reviewing memory, classify each item:

    line 182
  19. Distinctive:

    Keep in durable memory

    line 185
  20. Distinctive:

    Keep only in session memory

    line 186
  21. Distinctive:

    Delete as stale, duplicate, or overfit

    line 187
  22. Distinctive:

    Keep it in durable memory when it remains useful context but is not a rule.

    line 190
  23. Distinctive:

    Keep it only in session memory when it is tied to the present thread.

    line 191
  24. Distinctive:

    When the user asks to review memory:

    line 195
  25. Distinctive:

    Read the host instruction file such as CLAUDE.md

    line 197
  26. Distinctive:

    Read the most relevant durable topic files

    line 199
  27. Very specific:

    Read .agent-memory/session/summary.md if current-thread context matters

    line 200
  28. Distinctive:

    Do not modify durable memory or instruction files without user approval unless the user explicitly asked you to apply the cleanup.

    line 207

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Overview

Use this skill when the task involves memory design or memory hygiene for Claude Code or a similar coding agent.

This skill organizes memory into three layers:

  1. Instruction memory
  2. Session memory
  3. Durable memory

The intent is to keep each layer narrow, useful, and easy to trust.

Before you start

  • Identify the host tool's instruction file. For Claude Code this is usually CLAUDE.md or CLAUDE.local.md. Other common examples are AGENTS.md and .github/copilot-instructions.md.
  • Identify or create a repo-local durable memory directory. The default layout in this skill uses .agent-memory/.
  • Identify or create the session summary file at .agent-memory/session/summary.md.

Layer 1: Instruction memory

Treat the host instruction file as the rule layer. In Claude Code, this is the CLAUDE.md layer.

Put information here only if it is:

  • stable
  • normative
  • broadly applicable across future work
  • costly for the agent to rediscover incorrectly

Good candidates:

  • test commands
  • review expectations
  • approval boundaries
  • release process rules
  • communication style preferences that consistently apply

Do not place transient task state here.

Layer 2: Session memory

Maintain .agent-memory/session/summary.md as the short-lived working notebook for the current thread.

It should answer:

  • What is actively being worked on now
  • What did the user ask for
  • Which files and functions matter
  • Which commands have already been run
  • Which errors happened and how they were resolved
  • What remains next

This layer should be updated during long tasks and before compaction or handoff.

Use this structure:

# Session Title

# Current State

# Task Specification

# Files and Functions

# Workflow

# Errors and Corrections

# Key Results

# Worklog

Keep it concise but concrete. Prefer file paths, exact commands, and specific failure modes over generic summaries.

Layer 3: Durable memory

Use .agent-memory/ for long-lived memories that should survive across conversations.

Store durable memories in topic files and keep .agent-memory/MEMORY.md as an index.

Use the following durable memory types:

user-profile

Information about the user's role, goals, background, and level of familiarity.

Examples:

  • backend-heavy engineer who wants frontend explanations grounded in systems concepts
  • founder who prefers quick trade-off summaries

working-style

Guidance about how to collaborate with this user or team.

Examples:

  • run tests before proposing a commit
  • avoid long recap paragraphs
  • prefer one bundled refactor PR in this codebase

project-context

Important project facts that are not derivable from the repo.

Examples:

  • freeze window dates
  • stakeholder constraints
  • migration rationale
  • incident aftermath that still shapes decisions

external-reference

Pointers to systems outside the repo.

Examples:

  • which dashboard matters for this codepath
  • which Linear board tracks this class of bugs
  • which Slack channel owns deployment coordination

Durable memory format

Each durable memory should live in its own file with frontmatter:

---
name: testing-policy
description: Integration tests in this repo must hit a real database
type: working-style
---

Integration tests in this repo must hit a real database.

Why:
A previous production migration failure was missed by mock-based coverage.

How to apply:
When changing data access or migrations, prefer real-db integration coverage over mocks.

The index file should stay short:

- [Testing Policy](testing-policy.md) - Real database integration tests are expected here

What not to save as durable memory

Do not save these unless there is a strong reason and the non-obvious part is the actual point:

  • file structure
  • code architecture visible in the repo
  • git history
  • recent diff summaries
  • temporary task state
  • obvious commands already documented in project instructions

If it can be recovered cheaply from the current repo, prefer not to save it as durable memory.

Recall discipline

Never trust durable memory blindly.

Before acting on it:

  • verify named files still exist
  • grep for named functions or flags
  • prefer current repo state over historical memory if they conflict
  • update or remove stale memories when you discover drift

Promotion workflow

When reviewing memory, classify each item:

  • Promote to instruction memory
  • Keep in durable memory
  • Keep only in session memory
  • Delete as stale, duplicate, or overfit

Promote into the instruction layer when the item has become a rule. Keep it in durable memory when it remains useful context but is not a rule. Keep it only in session memory when it is tied to the present thread.

Review workflow

When the user asks to review memory:

  1. Read the host instruction file such as CLAUDE.md
  2. Read .agent-memory/MEMORY.md
  3. Read the most relevant durable topic files
  4. Read .agent-memory/session/summary.md if current-thread context matters
  5. Produce a report with:
    • promotions
    • cleanup
    • conflicts
    • ambiguous items

Do not modify durable memory or instruction files without user approval unless the user explicitly asked you to apply the cleanup.

File layout used by this skill

.agent-memory/
├── MEMORY.md
├── user/
├── style/
├── project/
├── references/
└── session/
    └── summary.md

References

  • Architecture notes: references/architecture.md
  • Host tool mapping: references/host-tool-mapping.md
  • Example durable memory files: examples/persistent-memory/MEMORY.md
  • Example session summary: examples/session-memory/summary.md

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.